References

Adamson, Peter. (2015). Philosophy in the Hellenistic and Roman worlds: A history of philosophy without any gaps, volume 2 (Oxford). Oxford University Press.
Adamson, Peter. (2019). Medieval philosophy: A history of philosophy without any gaps, volume 4. Oxford University Press.
Adamson, Peter, and Jonardon Ganeri. (2020). Classical indian philosophy: A history of philosophy without any gaps, volume 5. Oxford University Press.
Anderson, Charity, and John Hawthorne. (2019a). Knowledge, practical adequacy, and stakes. Oxford Studies in Epistemology, 6, 234–257.
Anderson, Charity, and John Hawthorne. (2019b). Pragmatic encroachment and closure. In Brian Kim & Matthew McGrath (Eds.), Pragmatic encroachment in epistemology (107–115). Routledge.
Armour-Garb, B. (2011). Contextualism without pragmatic encroachment. Analysis, 71(4), 667–676. doi:10.1093/analys/anr083
Aumann, Robert J. (1999). Interactive epistemology I: knowledge. International Journal of Game Theory, 28(3), 263–300. doi:10.1007/s001820050111
Basu, Rima, and Mark Schroeder. (2019). Doxastic wrongings. In Brian Kim & Matthew McGrath (Eds.), Pragmatic encroachment in epistemology (181–205). Routledge.
Bennett, Karen. (2017). Making things up. Oxford University Press.
Bhatt, Rajesh. (1999). Covert modality in non-finite contexts (PhD thesis). University of Pennsylvania.
Bird, Alexander. (2004). Is evidence non-inferential? Philosophical Quarterly, 54(215), 252–265. doi:10.1111/j.0031-8094.2004.00350.x
Blome-Tillmann, Michael. (2009). Contextualism, subject-sensitive invariantism, and the interaction of ‘knowledge’-ascriptions with modal and temporal operators. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 79(2), 315–331. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2009.00280.x
Boyd, Kenneth. (2016). Pragmatic encroachment and epistemically responsible action. Synthese, 193(9), 2721–2745. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0878-y
Brittain, Charles, and Peter Osorio. (2021). Philo of Larissa. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2021). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/philo-larissa/; Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Brown, Jessica. (2008). Subject-sensitive invariantism and the knowledge norm for practical reasoning. Noûs, 42(2), 167–189. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2008.00677.x
Buchak, Lara. (2013). Risk and rationality. Oxford University Press.
Caplin, Andrew, Mark Dean, and Daniel Martin. (2011). Search and satisficing. American Economic Review, 101(7), 2899–2922. doi:10.1257/aer.101.7.2899
Carlsson, Hans, and Eric van Damme. (1993). Global games and equilibrium selection. Econometrica, 61(5), 989–1018. doi:10.2307/2951491
Chakravarti, Ashok. (2017). Imperfect information and opportunism. Journal of Economic Issues, 51(4), 1114–1136. doi:10.1080/00213624.2017.1391594
Chernev, Alexander, Ulf Böckenholt, and Joseph Goodman. (2015). Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 333–358. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002
Cherniak, Christopher. (1986). Minimal rationality. MIT Press.
Cho, In-Koo, and David M. Kreps. (1987). Signalling games and stable equilibria. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(2), 179–221. doi:10.2307/1885060
Christensen, David. (2005). Putting logic in its place. Oxford University Press.
Christensen, David. (2007). Does Murphy’s law apply in epistemology? Self-doubt and rational ideals. Oxford Studies in Epistemology, 2, 3–31.
Christensen, David. (2011). Disagreement, question-begging and epistemic self-criticism. Philosophers’ Imprint, 11(6), 1–22. doi:2027/spo.3521354.0011.006
Christensen, David. (2019). Formulating independence. In Mattias Skipper & Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (Eds.), Higher-order evidence: New essays (13–34). Oxford University Press.
Clark, Christopher. (2012). The sleepwalkers: How Europe went to war in 1914. Harper Collins.
Cohen, Stewart. (2002). Basic knowledge and the problem of easy knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65(2), 309–329. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00204.x
Cohen, Stewart. (2004). Knowledge, assertion, and practical reasoning. Philosophical Issues, 14(1), 482–491. doi:10.1111/j.1533-6077.2004.00040.x
Conlisk, John. (1996). Why bounded rationality? Journal of Economic Literature, 34(2), 669–700.
Crisp, Roger. (2021). Well-Being. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2021). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Cross, Charles, and Floris Roelofsen. (2018). Questions. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2018). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/questions/; Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Das, Nilanjan. (2016). Epistemic stability (PhD thesis). MIT.
DeRose, Keith. (2002). Assertion, knowledge and context. Philosophical Review, 111(2), 167–203. doi:10.2307/3182618
Diab, Dalia L., Michael A. Gillespie, and Scott Highhouse. (2008). Are maximizers really unhappy? The measurement of maximizing tendency. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(5), 364–370. doi:10.1017/S1930297500000383
Dogramaci, Sinan. (2015). Forget and forgive: A practical approach to forgotten evidence. Ergo, 2(26), 645–677. doi:10.3998/ergo.12405314.0002.026
Dylan, Bob. (2016). The lyrics: 1961-2012. Simon & Schuster.
Eaton, Daniel, and Timothy Pickavance. (2015). Evidence against pragmatic encroachment. Philosophical Studies, 172, 3135–3143. doi:10.1007/s11098-015-0461-x
Egan, Andy. (2008). Seeing and believing: Perception, belief formation and the divided mind. Philosophical Studies, 140(1), 47–63. doi:10.1007/s11098-008-9225-1
Elster, Jon. (1979). Ulysses and the sirens: Studies in rationality and irrationality. Cambridge University Press.
Falbo, Arianna. (2021). Inquiry and confirmation. Analysis, 81(4), 622–631. doi:10.1093/analys/anab037
Fantl, Jeremy, and Matthew McGrath. (2002). Evidence, pragmatics, and justification. Philosophical Review, 111(1), 67–94. doi:10.2307/3182570
Fantl, Jeremy, and Matthew McGrath. (2009). Knowledge in an uncertain world. Oxford University Press.
Foley, Richard. (1993). Working without a net. Oxford University Press.
Friedman, Jane. (2017). Why suspend judging? Noûs, 51(2), 302–326. doi:10.1111/nous.12137
Friedman, Jane. (2019a). Checking again. Philosophical Issues, 29(1), 84–96. doi:10.1111/phis.12141
Friedman, Jane. (2019b). Inquiry and belief. Noûs, 53(2), 296–315. doi:10.1111/nous.12222
Friedman, Jane. (2020). The epistemic and the zetetic. Philosophical Review, 129(4), 501–536. doi:10.1215/00318108-8540918
Friedman, Jane. (2024a). Suspension of judgment is a question-directed attitude. In Blake Roeber, Ernest Sosa, Matthias Steup, & John Turri (Eds.), Contemporary debates in epistemology (3rd ed., 66–78). Wiley Blackwell.
Friedman, Jane. (2024b). The aim of inquiry? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 108(2), 506–523. doi:10.1111/phpr.12982
Ganson, Dorit. (2008). Evidentialism and pragmatic constraints on outright belief. Philosophical Studies, 139(3), 441–458. doi:10.1007/s11098-007-9133-9
Ganson, Dorit. (2019). Great expectations: Belief and the case for pragmatic encroachment. In Brian Kim & Matthew McGrath (Eds.), Pragmatic encroachment in epistemology (10–34). Routledge.
Gao, Jie. (2023). Should credence be sensitive to practical factors? A cost-benefit analysis. Mind and Language, 38(5), 1238–1257. doi:10.1111/mila.12451
Gendler, Tamar Szabó, and John Hawthorne. (2005). The real guide to fake barns: A catalogue of gifts for your epistemic enemies. Philosophical Studies, 124(3), 331–352. doi:10.1007/s11098-005-7779-8
Gettier, Edmund L. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis, 23(6), 121–123. doi:10.1093/analys/23.6.121
Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Reinhard Selten. (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. MIT Press.
Gillies, Anthony S. (2010). Iffiness. Semantics and Pragmatics, 3(4), 1–42. doi:10.3765/sp.3.4
Goldman, Alvin. (2009). Williamson on knowledge and evidence. In Patrick Greenough & Duncan Pritchard (Eds.), Williamson on Knowledge (73–91). Oxford University Press.
Harman, Gilbert. (1973). Thought. Princeton University Press.
Harman, Gilbert. (1986). Change in view. MIT Press.
Harper, William. (1986). Mixed strategies and ratifiability in causal decision theory. Erkenntnis, 24(1), 25–36. doi:10.1007/BF00183199
Hawthorne, John. (2004). Knowledge and lotteries. Oxford University Press.
Hawthorne, John. (2005). Knowledge and evidence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 70(2), 452–458. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00540.x
Hawthorne, John, Daniel Rothschild, and Levi Spectre. (2016). Belief is weak. Philosophical Studies, 173, 1393–1404. doi:10.1007/s11098-015-0553-7
Hawthorne, John, and Amia Srinivasan. (2013). Disagreement without transparency: Some bleak thoughts. In David Christensen & Jennifer Lackey (Eds.), The epistemology of disagreement: New essays (9–30). Oxford University Press.
Hawthorne, John, and Jason Stanley. (2008). Knowledge and Action. Journal of Philosophy, 105(10), 571–590. doi:10.5840/jphil20081051022
Hedden, Brian. (2012). Options and the subjective ought. Philosophical Studies, 158(2), 343–360. doi:10.1007/s11098-012-9880-0
Hieronymi, Pamela. (2013). The use of reasons in thought (and the use of earmarks in arguments). Ethics, 124(1), 114–127. doi:10.1086/671402
Hills, Alison. (2009). Moral testimony and moral epistemology. Ethics, 120(1), 94–127. doi:10.1086/648610
Holliday, Wesley H., and Matthew Mandelkern. (2024). The orthologic of epistemic modals. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 53(831-907). doi:10.1007/s10992-024-09746-7
Hotelling, Harold. (1929). Stability in competition. The Economic Journal, 39(153), 41–57. doi:10.2307/2224214
Humberstone, I. L. (1981). From worlds to possibilities. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 10(3), 313–339. doi:10.1007/BF00293423
Humberstone, Lloyd. (2016). Philsophical applications of modal logic. College Publications.
Hunter, Daniel. (1996). On the relation between categorical and probabilistic belief. Noûs, 30, 75–98. doi:10.2307/2216304
Ichikawa, Jonathan. (2012). Knowledge norms and acting well. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 1(1), 49–55. doi:10.1002/tht3.7
Ichikawa, Jonathan. (2017). Contextualising knowledge. Oxford University Press.
Iyengar, Sheena S., Rachael E. Wells, and Barry Schwartz. (2006). Doing better but feeling worse: Looking for the ‘best’ job undermines satisfaction. Psychological Science, 17(2), 143–150. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01677.x
Jackson, Frank. (1987). Conditionals. Oxford.
Joyce, James. (2018). Deliberation and stability in newcomb problems and pseudo-newcomb problems. In Arif Ahmed (Ed.), Newcomb’s problem (138–159). Cambridge University Press.
Joyce, James M. (1999). The foundations of causal decision theory. Cambridge University Press.
Keynes, John Maynard. (1936). Herbert Somerton Foxwell. The Economic Journal, 46(184), 589–619. doi:10.2307/2224674
Keynes, John Maynard. (1937). The general theory of employment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51(2), 209–223.
Kim, Brian. (2023). Pragmatic infallibilism. Asian Journal of Philosophy, 2(2), 1–22. doi:10.1007/s44204-023-00097-9
Kimball, Miles. (2015). Cognitive economics. The Japanese Economic Review, 66(2), 167–181. doi:10.1111/jere.12070
Knight, Frank. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. University of Chicago Press.
Kohlberg, Elon, and Jean-Francois Mertens. (1986). On the strategic stability of equilibria. Econometrica, 54(5), 1003–1037. doi:10.2307/1912320
Kratzer, Angelika. (2012). Modals and conditionals. Oxford University Press.
Kripke, Saul. (2011). Nozick on knowledge. In Philosophical troubles: Collected papers, volume 1 (161–224). Oxford University Press.
Kroedel, Thomas. (2012). The lottery paradox, epistemic justification and permissibility. Analysis, 72(1), 57–60. doi:10.1093/analys/anr129
Lasonen-Aarnio, Maria. (2010). Unreasonable knowledge. Philosophical Perspectives, 24, 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2010.00183.x
Lasonen-Aarnio, Maria. (2014). Higher-order evidence and the limits of defeat. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 88(2), 314–345. doi:10.1111/phpr.12090
Lederman, Harvey. (2018). Two paradoxes of common knowledge: Coordinated attack and electronic mail. Noûs, 52(4), 921–945. doi:10.1111/nous.12186
Lee, Matthew. (2017a). Credence and correctness: In defense of credal reductivism. Philosophical Papers, 46(2), 273–296. doi:10.1080/05568641.2017.1364142
Lee, Matthew. (2017b). On the arbitrariness objection to the threshold view. Dialogue, 56(1), 143–158. doi:10.1017/S0012217317000154
Lewis, David. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study. Harvard University Press.
Lewis, David. (1976). Probabilities of conditionals and conditional probabilities. Philosophical Review, 85(3), 297–315. doi:10.2307/2184045
Lewis, David. (1982). Logic for equivocators. Noûs, 16(3), 431–441. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625237.009
Lewis, David. (1986). Probabilities of conditionals and conditional probabilities II. Philosophical Review, 95(4), 581–589. doi:10.2307/2185051
Lewis, David. (1988). Desire as belief. Mind, 97(387), 323–332. doi:10.1093/mind/xcvii.387.323
Lewis, David. (1996). Desire as belief II. Mind, 105(418), 303–313. doi:10.1093/mind/105.418.303
Lewis, David. (2004). Causation as influence. In John Collins, Ned Hall, & L. A. Paul (Eds.), Causation and counterfactuals (75–106). MIT Press.
Lipsey, R. G., and Kelvin Lancaster. (1956-1957). The general theory of second best. Review of Economic Studies, 24(1), 11–32. doi:10.2307/2296233
Littlejohn, Clayton. (2018). Stop making sense? On a puzzle about rationality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 96(2), 257–272. doi:10.1111/phpr.12271
MacFarlane, John. (2005). The assessment sensitivity of knowledge attributions. Oxford Studies in Epistemology, 1, 197–233.
Machamer, Peter, Lindley Darden, and Carl F. Craver. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67(1), 1–25. doi:10.1086/392759
Maher, Patrick. (1996). Subjective and objective confirmation. Philosophy of Science, 63(2), 149–174. doi:10.1086/289906
Maier, John. (2022). Abilities. In Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2022). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Maitra, Ishani, and Brian Weatherson. (2010). Assertion, knowledge and action. Philosophical Studies, 149(1), 99–118. doi:10.1007/s11098-010-9542-z
Mandelkern, Matthew, Ginger Schultheis, and David Boylan. (2017). Agentive modals. Philosophical Review, 126(3), 301–343. doi:10.1215/00318108-3878483
Mangan, Jean, Amanda Hughes, and Kim Slack. (2010). Student finance, information and decision making. Higher Education, 60(5), 459–472. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9309-7
Manski, Charles F. (2017). Optimize, satisfice, or choose without deliberation? A simple minimax-regret assessment. Theory and Decision, 83(2), 155–173. doi:10.1007/s11238-017-9592-1
McGrath, Matthew. (2021). Being neutral: Agnosticism, inquiry and the suspension of judgment. Noûs, 55(2), 463–484. doi:10.1111/nous.12323
McGrath, Matthew, and Brian Kim. (2019). Introduction. In Brian Kim & Matthew McGrath (Eds.), Pragmatic encroachment in epistemology (1–9). Routledge.
Melchior, Guido. (2019). Knowing and checking: An epistemological investigation. Routledge.
Mercier, Hugo. (2020). Not born yesterday: The science of who we trust and what we believe. Princeton University Press.
Nagel, Jennifer. (2010). Epistemic anxiety and adaptive invariantism. Philosophical Perspectives, 24(1), 407–435. doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2010.00198.x
Nagel, Jennifer. (2013). Motivating Williamson’s model Gettier cases. Inquiry, 56(1), 54–62. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2013.775014
Nagel, Jennifer. (2014). Knowledge: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Nair, Shyam. (2019). Must good reasoning satisfy cumulative transitivity? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 98(1), 123–146. doi:10.1111/phpr.12431
Neta, Ram. (2007). Anti-intellectualism and the knowledge-action principle. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 75(1), 180–187. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00069.x
Newman, David B., Joanna Schug, Masaki Yuki, Junko Yamada, and John B. Nezlek. (2018). The negative consequences of maximizing in friendship selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(5), 804–824. doi:10.1037/pspp0000141
North, Jill. (2010). An empirical approach to symmetry and probability. Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies In History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41(1), 27–40. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2009.08.008
Nozick, Robert. (1981). Philosophical explorations. Harvard University Press.
Odell, John S. (2002). Bounded rationality and world political economy. In David M. Andrews, C. Randall Henning, & Louis W. Pauly (Eds.), Governing the world’s money (168–193). Cornell University Press.
Ogaki, Masao, and Saori C. Tanaka. (2017). Behavioral economics: Toward a new economics by integration with traditional economics. Springer.
Papi, Mario. (2013). Satisficing and maximizing consumers in a monopolistic screening model. Mathematical Social Sciences, 66(3), 385–389. doi:10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2013.08.005
Pasnau, Robert. (2017). After certainty: A history of our epistemic ideals and illusions. Oxford University Press.
Pingle, Mark. (2006). Deliberation cost as a foundation for behavioral economics. In Morris Altman (Ed.), Handbook of contemporary behavioral economics: Foundations and developments (340–355). Routledge.
Pryor, James. (2004). What’s wrong with Moore’s argument? Philosophical Issues, 14(1), 349–378. doi:10.1111/j.1533-6077.2004.00034.x
Quiggin, John. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(4), 323–343. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(82)90008-7
Quong, Jonathan. (2018). Public Reason. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2018). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/public-reason/; Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Railton, Peter. (1984). Alienation, consequentialism and the demands of morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 13(2), 134–171.
Ramsey, Frank. (1990). General propositions and causality. In D. H. Mellor (Ed.), Philosophical papers (145–163). Cambridge University Press.
Reutskaja, Elena, Rosemarie Nagel, Colin F. Camerer, and Antonio Rangel. (2011). Search dynamics in consumer choice under time pressure: An eye-tracking study. American Economic Review, 101(2), 900–926. doi:10.1257/aer.101.2.900
Roberts, Craige. (2012). Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics, 5(6), 1–69. doi:10.3765/sp.5.6
Ross, Jacob, and Mark Schroeder. (2014). Belief, credence, and pragmatic encroachment. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 88(2), 259–288. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00552.x
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. (1913). Social contract & discourses (G. D. H. Cole, Trans.). J. M. Dent & Sons.
Russell, Gillian, and John M. Doris. (2009). Knowledge by indifference. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 86(3), 429–437. doi:10.1080/00048400802001996
Russell, Stuart J. (1997). Rationality and intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 94(1-2), 57–77. doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00026-X
Savage, Leonard. (1967). Difficulties in the theory of personal probability. Philosophy of Science, 34(4), 305–310. doi:10.1086/288168
Scheibehenne, Benjamin, Rainer Greifeneder, and Peter M. Todd. (2010). Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 409–425. doi:10.1086/651235
Schmidt, Eva. (forthcoming). Reasons, attenuators, and virtue: A novel account of pragmatic encroachment. Analytic Philosophy, 1–22. doi:10.1111/phib.12314
Schoenfield, Miriam. (2013). Permission to believe: Why permissivism is true and what it tells us about irrelevant influences on belief. Noûs, 47(1), 193–218. doi:10.1111/nous.12006
Schroeder, Mark. (2009). Means-end coherence, stringency, and subjective reasons. Philosophical Studies, 143(2), 223–248. doi:10.1007/s11098-008-9200-x
Schroeder, Mark. (2012). Stakes, withholding and pragmatic encroachment on knowledge. Philosophical Studies, 160(2), 265–285. doi:10.1007/s11098-011-9718-1
Schwartz, Barry. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. Harper Collins.
Schwartz, Barry, Andrew Ward, John Monterosso, Sonja Lyubomirsky, Katherin White, and Darrin R. Lehman. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1178–1197. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1178
Skyrms, Brian. (2001). The stag hunt. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 75(2), 31–41. doi:10.2307/3218711
Sosa, Ernest. (1999). How to defeat opposition to Moore. Philosophical Perspectives, 13, 141–153. doi:10.1111/0029-4624.33.s13.7
Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre Wilson. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind and Language, 25(4), 359–393. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x
Staffel, Julia. (2019). How do beliefs simplify reasoning? Noûs, 53(4), 937–962. doi:10.1111/nous.12254
Stalnaker, Robert. (1975). Indicative conditionals. Philosophica, 5(3), 269–289. doi:10.1007/bf02379021
Stalnaker, Robert. (1984). Inquiry. MIT Press.
Stalnaker, Robert. (1994). On the evaluation of solution concepts. Theory and Decision, 37(1), 49–73. doi:10.1007/BF01079205
Stalnaker, Robert. (1996). Knowledge, belief and counterfactual reasoning in games. Economics and Philosophy, 12, 133–163. doi:10.1017/S0266267100004132
Stalnaker, Robert. (1998). Belief revision in games: Forward and backward induction. Mathematical Social Sciences, 36(1), 31–56. doi:10.1016/S0165-4896(98)00007-9
Stalnaker, Robert. (1999). Extensive and strategic forms: Games and models for games. Research in Economics, 53(3), 293–319. doi:10.1006/reec.1999.0200
Stanley, Jason. (2005). Knowledge and Practical Interests. Oxford University Press.
Stanley, Jason. (2011). Know how. Oxford University Press.
Steglich-Petersen, Asbjørn. (2024). An instrumentalist explanation of pragmatic encroachment. Analytic Philosophy, 65(3), 374–392. doi:10.1111/phib.12283
Strevens, Michael. (2020). The knowledge machine: How irrationality created modern science. Liveright.
Tucker, Chris. (2016). Satisficing and motivated submaximization (in the philosophy of religion). Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 93(1), 127–143. doi:10.1111/phpr.12191
Unger, Peter. (1975). Ignorance: A case for scepticism. Oxford University Press.
Weatherson, Brian. (2005a). Can We Do Without Pragmatic Encroachment? Philosophical Perspectives, 19(1), 417–443. doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2005.00068.x
Weatherson, Brian. (2005b). True, truer, truest. Philosophical Studies, 123(1-2), 47–70. doi:10.1007/s11098-004-5218-x
Weatherson, Brian. (2011). Defending interest-relative invariantism. Logos & Episteme, 2(4), 591–609. doi:10.5840/logos-episteme2011248
Weatherson, Brian. (2012). Knowledge, bets and interests. In Jessica Brown & Mikkel Gerken (Eds.), Knowledge ascriptions (75–103). Oxford University Press.
Weatherson, Brian. (2016a). Games, beliefs and credences. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 92(2), 209–236. doi:10.1111/phpr.12088
Weatherson, Brian. (2016b). Reply to Eaton and Pickavance. Philosophical Studies, 173(12), 3231–3233.
Weatherson, Brian. (2017). Interest-relative invariantism. In Jonathan Ichikawa (Ed.), The routledge handbook of epistemic contextualism (240–253). Routledge.
Weatherson, Brian. (2018). Interests, evidence and games. Episteme, 15(3), 329–344.
Weatherson, Brian. (2019). Normative externalism. Oxford University Press.
Weisberg, Jonathan. (2010). Bootstrapping in general. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81(3), 525–548. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00448.x
Weisberg, Jonathan. (2013). Knowledge in action. Philosophers’ Imprint, 13(22), 1–23. doi:2027/spo.3521354.0013.022
Weisberg, Jonathan. (2020). Belief in psyontology. Philosophers’ Imprint, xx–xx.
White, Roger. (2005). Epistemic permissiveness. Philosophical Perspectives, 19, 445–459. doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2005.00069.x
Williams, Bernard. (1976). Persons, character and morality. In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (Ed.), The identities of persons (197–216). University of California Press.
Williamson, Timothy. (1994). Vagueness. Routledge.
Williamson, Timothy. (2000). Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford University Press.
Williamson, Timothy. (2005). Contextualism, Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and Knowledge of Knowledge. The Philosophical Quarterly, 55(219), 213–235. doi:10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00396.x
Williamson, Timothy. (2007). How probable is an infinite sequence of heads? Analysis, 67(295), 173–180. doi:10.1093/analys/67.3.173
Williamson, Timothy. (2013). Gettier cases in epistemic logic. Inquiry, 56(1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2013.775010
Williamson, Timothy. (2022). Knowledge, credence, and the strength of belief. In Amy Flowerree & Baron Reed (Eds.), Expansive epistemology: Norms, action, and the social world (xx–xx). Routledge.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Macmillan.
Woodard, Elise. (2024). Why double-check. Episteme, 21, 664–667. doi:10.1017/epi.2022.22
Wright, Crispin. (2002). (Anti-)sceptics simple and subtle: G.E. Moore and John McDowell. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65(2), 330–348. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00205.x
Wright, Crispin. (2018). A plague on all your houses: Some reflections on the variable behaviour of "knows". In Annalisa Coliva, Paolo Leonardi, & Sebastiano Moruzzi (Eds.), Eva picardi on language, analysis and history (357–383). Palgrave Macmillan.
Wu, Jenny Yi-Chen. (forthcoming). A defense of impurist permissivism. Episteme, 1–21. doi:10.1017/epi.2023.22
Yalcin, Seth. (2018). Belief as question-sensitive. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 97(1), 23–47. doi:10.1111/phpr.12330
Yalcin, Seth. (2021). Fragmented but rational. In Christina Borgoni, Dirk Kindermann, & Andrea Onofori (Eds.), The fragmented mind (156–179). Oxford University Press.
Ye, Ru. (2024). Knowledge-action principles and threshold-impurism. Erkenntnis, 89, 2215–2232. doi:10.1007/s10670-022-00626-7
Zweber, Adam. (2016). Fallibilism, closure, and pragmatic encroachment. Philosophical Studies, 173(10), 2745–2757. doi:10.1007/s11098-016-0631-5