References
Adamson, Peter. (2015). Philosophy in the Hellenistic
and Roman worlds: A history of philosophy
without any gaps, volume 2 (Oxford). Oxford University Press.
Adamson, Peter. (2019). Medieval philosophy: A history of philosophy
without any gaps, volume 4. Oxford
University Press.
Adamson, Peter, and Jonardon Ganeri. (2020). Classical indian
philosophy: A history of philosophy without any gaps, volume 5.
Oxford University Press.
Anderson, Charity, and John Hawthorne. (2019a). Knowledge, practical
adequacy, and stakes. Oxford Studies in Epistemology,
6, 234–257.
Anderson, Charity, and John Hawthorne. (2019b). Pragmatic encroachment
and closure. In Brian Kim & Matthew McGrath (Eds.), Pragmatic
encroachment in epistemology (107–115). Routledge.
Armour-Garb, B. (2011). Contextualism without pragmatic encroachment.
Analysis, 71(4), 667–676. doi:10.1093/analys/anr083
Aumann, Robert J. (1999). Interactive epistemology I:
knowledge. International Journal of Game Theory,
28(3), 263–300. doi:10.1007/s001820050111
Basu, Rima, and Mark Schroeder. (2019). Doxastic wrongings. In Brian Kim
& Matthew McGrath (Eds.), Pragmatic encroachment in
epistemology (181–205). Routledge.
Bennett, Karen. (2017). Making things up. Oxford University
Press.
Bhatt, Rajesh. (1999). Covert modality in non-finite contexts
(PhD thesis). University of Pennsylvania.
Bird, Alexander. (2004). Is evidence non-inferential? Philosophical
Quarterly, 54(215), 252–265. doi:10.1111/j.0031-8094.2004.00350.x
Blome-Tillmann, Michael. (2009). Contextualism, subject-sensitive
invariantism, and the interaction of
‘knowledge’-ascriptions with modal and temporal operators.
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 79(2),
315–331. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2009.00280.x
Boyd, Kenneth. (2016). Pragmatic encroachment and epistemically
responsible action. Synthese, 193(9), 2721–2745.
doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0878-y
Brittain, Charles, and Peter Osorio. (2021). Philo
of Larissa. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The
Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy
(Summer 2021). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/philo-larissa/;
Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Brown, Jessica. (2008). Subject-sensitive invariantism and the knowledge
norm for practical reasoning. Noûs,
42(2), 167–189. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2008.00677.x
Buchak, Lara. (2013). Risk and rationality. Oxford University
Press.
Caplin, Andrew, Mark Dean, and Daniel Martin. (2011). Search and
satisficing. American Economic Review, 101(7),
2899–2922. doi:10.1257/aer.101.7.2899
Carlsson, Hans, and Eric van Damme. (1993). Global games and equilibrium
selection. Econometrica, 61(5), 989–1018. doi:10.2307/2951491
Chakravarti, Ashok. (2017). Imperfect information and opportunism.
Journal of Economic Issues, 51(4), 1114–1136. doi:10.1080/00213624.2017.1391594
Chernev, Alexander, Ulf Böckenholt, and Joseph Goodman. (2015). Choice
overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer
Psychology, 25(2), 333–358. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002
Cherniak, Christopher. (1986). Minimal rationality. MIT Press.
Cho, In-Koo, and David M. Kreps. (1987). Signalling games and stable
equilibria. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,
102(2), 179–221. doi:10.2307/1885060
Christensen, David. (2005). Putting logic in its place. Oxford
University Press.
Christensen, David. (2007). Does Murphy’s law apply in
epistemology? Self-doubt and rational ideals. Oxford Studies in
Epistemology, 2, 3–31.
Christensen, David. (2011). Disagreement, question-begging and epistemic
self-criticism. Philosophers’ Imprint, 11(6), 1–22.
doi:2027/spo.3521354.0011.006
Christensen, David. (2019). Formulating independence. In Mattias Skipper
& Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (Eds.), Higher-order evidence: New
essays (13–34). Oxford University Press.
Clark, Christopher. (2012). The sleepwalkers: How
Europe went to war in 1914. Harper Collins.
Cohen, Stewart. (2002). Basic knowledge and the problem of easy
knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,
65(2), 309–329. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00204.x
Cohen, Stewart. (2004). Knowledge, assertion, and practical reasoning.
Philosophical Issues, 14(1), 482–491. doi:10.1111/j.1533-6077.2004.00040.x
Conlisk, John. (1996). Why bounded rationality? Journal of Economic
Literature, 34(2), 669–700.
Crisp, Roger. (2021). Well-Being. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.),
The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy
(Winter 2021). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford
University.
Cross, Charles, and Floris Roelofsen. (2018). Questions. In Edward N.
Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring
2018). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/questions/;
Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Das, Nilanjan. (2016). Epistemic stability (PhD thesis).
MIT.
DeRose, Keith. (2002). Assertion, knowledge and context.
Philosophical Review, 111(2), 167–203. doi:10.2307/3182618
Diab, Dalia L., Michael A. Gillespie, and Scott Highhouse. (2008). Are
maximizers really unhappy? The measurement of maximizing tendency.
Judgment and Decision Making, 3(5), 364–370. doi:10.1017/S1930297500000383
Dogramaci, Sinan. (2015). Forget and forgive: A practical approach to
forgotten evidence. Ergo, 2(26), 645–677. doi:10.3998/ergo.12405314.0002.026
Dylan, Bob. (2016). The lyrics: 1961-2012. Simon &
Schuster.
Eaton, Daniel, and Timothy Pickavance. (2015). Evidence against
pragmatic encroachment. Philosophical Studies, 172,
3135–3143. doi:10.1007/s11098-015-0461-x
Egan, Andy. (2008). Seeing and believing: Perception, belief formation
and the divided mind. Philosophical Studies, 140(1),
47–63. doi:10.1007/s11098-008-9225-1
Elster, Jon. (1979). Ulysses and the sirens: Studies in rationality
and irrationality. Cambridge University Press.
Falbo, Arianna. (2021). Inquiry and confirmation. Analysis,
81(4), 622–631. doi:10.1093/analys/anab037
Fantl, Jeremy, and Matthew McGrath. (2002). Evidence, pragmatics, and
justification. Philosophical Review, 111(1), 67–94.
doi:10.2307/3182570
Fantl, Jeremy, and Matthew McGrath. (2009). Knowledge in an
uncertain world. Oxford University Press.
Foley, Richard. (1993). Working without a net. Oxford
University Press.
Friedman, Jane. (2017). Why suspend judging? Noûs,
51(2), 302–326. doi:10.1111/nous.12137
Friedman, Jane. (2019a). Checking again. Philosophical Issues,
29(1), 84–96. doi:10.1111/phis.12141
Friedman, Jane. (2019b). Inquiry and belief. Noûs,
53(2), 296–315. doi:10.1111/nous.12222
Friedman, Jane. (2020). The epistemic and the zetetic. Philosophical
Review, 129(4), 501–536. doi:10.1215/00318108-8540918
Friedman, Jane. (2024a). Suspension of judgment is a question-directed
attitude. In Blake Roeber, Ernest Sosa, Matthias Steup, & John Turri
(Eds.), Contemporary debates in epistemology (3rd ed., 66–78).
Wiley Blackwell.
Friedman, Jane. (2024b). The aim of inquiry? Philosophy
and Phenomenological Research,
108(2), 506–523. doi:10.1111/phpr.12982
Ganson, Dorit. (2008). Evidentialism and pragmatic constraints on
outright belief. Philosophical Studies, 139(3),
441–458. doi:10.1007/s11098-007-9133-9
Ganson, Dorit. (2019). Great expectations: Belief and the case for
pragmatic encroachment. In Brian Kim & Matthew McGrath (Eds.),
Pragmatic encroachment in epistemology (10–34). Routledge.
Gao, Jie. (2023). Should credence be sensitive to practical factors? A
cost-benefit analysis. Mind and Language, 38(5),
1238–1257. doi:10.1111/mila.12451
Gendler, Tamar Szabó, and John Hawthorne. (2005). The real guide to fake
barns: A catalogue of gifts for your epistemic enemies.
Philosophical Studies, 124(3), 331–352. doi:10.1007/s11098-005-7779-8
Gettier, Edmund L. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge?
Analysis, 23(6), 121–123. doi:10.1093/analys/23.6.121
Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Reinhard Selten. (2001). Bounded rationality:
The adaptive toolbox. MIT Press.
Gillies, Anthony S. (2010). Iffiness. Semantics and Pragmatics,
3(4), 1–42. doi:10.3765/sp.3.4
Goldman, Alvin. (2009). Williamson on knowledge and evidence. In Patrick
Greenough & Duncan Pritchard (Eds.), Williamson on Knowledge (73–91). Oxford
University Press.
Harman, Gilbert. (1973). Thought. Princeton University Press.
Harman, Gilbert. (1986). Change in view. MIT
Press.
Harper, William. (1986). Mixed strategies and ratifiability in causal
decision theory. Erkenntnis, 24(1), 25–36. doi:10.1007/BF00183199
Hawthorne, John. (2004). Knowledge and lotteries. Oxford
University Press.
Hawthorne, John. (2005). Knowledge and evidence. Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research, 70(2), 452–458. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00540.x
Hawthorne, John, Daniel Rothschild, and Levi Spectre. (2016). Belief is
weak. Philosophical Studies, 173, 1393–1404. doi:10.1007/s11098-015-0553-7
Hawthorne, John, and Amia Srinivasan. (2013). Disagreement without
transparency: Some bleak thoughts. In David Christensen & Jennifer
Lackey (Eds.), The epistemology of disagreement: New essays
(9–30). Oxford University Press.
Hawthorne, John, and Jason Stanley. (2008). Knowledge and Action. Journal of
Philosophy, 105(10), 571–590. doi:10.5840/jphil20081051022
Hedden, Brian. (2012). Options and the subjective ought.
Philosophical Studies, 158(2), 343–360. doi:10.1007/s11098-012-9880-0
Hieronymi, Pamela. (2013). The use of reasons in thought (and the use of
earmarks in arguments). Ethics, 124(1), 114–127.
doi:10.1086/671402
Hills, Alison. (2009). Moral testimony and moral epistemology.
Ethics, 120(1), 94–127. doi:10.1086/648610
Holliday, Wesley H., and Matthew Mandelkern. (2024). The orthologic of
epistemic modals. Journal of Philosophical Logic,
53(831-907). doi:10.1007/s10992-024-09746-7
Hotelling, Harold. (1929). Stability in competition. The Economic
Journal, 39(153), 41–57. doi:10.2307/2224214
Humberstone, I. L. (1981). From worlds to possibilities. Journal of
Philosophical Logic, 10(3), 313–339. doi:10.1007/BF00293423
Humberstone, Lloyd. (2016). Philsophical applications of modal
logic. College Publications.
Hunter, Daniel. (1996). On the relation between categorical and
probabilistic belief. Noûs, 30, 75–98.
doi:10.2307/2216304
Ichikawa, Jonathan. (2012). Knowledge norms and acting well.
Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 1(1), 49–55. doi:10.1002/tht3.7
Ichikawa, Jonathan. (2017). Contextualising knowledge.
Oxford University Press.
Iyengar, Sheena S., Rachael E. Wells, and Barry Schwartz. (2006). Doing
better but feeling worse: Looking for the ‘best’ job
undermines satisfaction. Psychological Science, 17(2),
143–150. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01677.x
Jackson, Frank. (1987). Conditionals. Oxford.
Joyce, James. (2018). Deliberation and stability in newcomb problems and
pseudo-newcomb problems. In Arif Ahmed (Ed.), Newcomb’s problem
(138–159). Cambridge University Press.
Joyce, James M. (1999). The foundations of causal decision
theory. Cambridge University Press.
Keynes, John Maynard. (1936). Herbert Somerton Foxwell.
The Economic Journal, 46(184), 589–619. doi:10.2307/2224674
Keynes, John Maynard. (1937). The general theory of employment.
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51(2), 209–223.
Kim, Brian. (2023). Pragmatic infallibilism. Asian Journal of
Philosophy, 2(2), 1–22. doi:10.1007/s44204-023-00097-9
Kimball, Miles. (2015). Cognitive economics. The Japanese Economic
Review, 66(2), 167–181. doi:10.1111/jere.12070
Knight, Frank. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. University
of Chicago Press.
Kohlberg, Elon, and Jean-Francois Mertens. (1986). On the strategic
stability of equilibria. Econometrica, 54(5),
1003–1037. doi:10.2307/1912320
Kratzer, Angelika. (2012). Modals and conditionals. Oxford
University Press.
Kripke, Saul. (2011). Nozick on knowledge. In Philosophical
troubles: Collected papers, volume 1 (161–224). Oxford
University Press.
Kroedel, Thomas. (2012). The lottery paradox, epistemic justification
and permissibility. Analysis, 72(1), 57–60. doi:10.1093/analys/anr129
Lasonen-Aarnio, Maria. (2010). Unreasonable knowledge. Philosophical
Perspectives, 24, 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2010.00183.x
Lasonen-Aarnio, Maria. (2014). Higher-order evidence and the limits of
defeat. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,
88(2), 314–345. doi:10.1111/phpr.12090
Lederman, Harvey. (2018). Two paradoxes of common knowledge: Coordinated
attack and electronic mail. Noûs, 52(4),
921–945. doi:10.1111/nous.12186
Lee, Matthew. (2017a). Credence and correctness: In defense of credal
reductivism. Philosophical Papers, 46(2), 273–296.
doi:10.1080/05568641.2017.1364142
Lee, Matthew. (2017b). On the arbitrariness objection to the threshold
view. Dialogue, 56(1), 143–158. doi:10.1017/S0012217317000154
Lewis, David. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study.
Harvard University Press.
Lewis, David. (1976). Probabilities of conditionals and conditional
probabilities. Philosophical Review, 85(3), 297–315.
doi:10.2307/2184045
Lewis, David. (1982). Logic for equivocators.
Noûs, 16(3), 431–441. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625237.009
Lewis, David. (1986). Probabilities of conditionals and conditional
probabilities II. Philosophical Review,
95(4), 581–589. doi:10.2307/2185051
Lewis, David. (1988). Desire as belief. Mind, 97(387),
323–332. doi:10.1093/mind/xcvii.387.323
Lewis, David. (1996). Desire as belief II. Mind,
105(418), 303–313. doi:10.1093/mind/105.418.303
Lewis, David. (2004). Causation as influence. In John Collins, Ned Hall,
& L. A. Paul (Eds.), Causation and counterfactuals
(75–106). MIT Press.
Lipsey, R. G., and Kelvin Lancaster. (1956-1957). The general theory of
second best. Review of Economic Studies, 24(1), 11–32.
doi:10.2307/2296233
Littlejohn, Clayton. (2018). Stop making sense? On a puzzle about
rationality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,
96(2), 257–272. doi:10.1111/phpr.12271
MacFarlane, John. (2005). The assessment sensitivity of knowledge
attributions. Oxford Studies in Epistemology, 1,
197–233.
Machamer, Peter, Lindley Darden, and Carl F. Craver. (2000). Thinking
about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67(1), 1–25.
doi:10.1086/392759
Maher, Patrick. (1996). Subjective and objective confirmation.
Philosophy of Science, 63(2), 149–174. doi:10.1086/289906
Maier, John. (2022). Abilities. In Edward N. Zalta &
Uri Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of
philosophy (Fall 2022). Metaphysics Research Lab,
Stanford University.
Maitra, Ishani, and Brian Weatherson. (2010). Assertion, knowledge and
action. Philosophical Studies, 149(1), 99–118. doi:10.1007/s11098-010-9542-z
Mandelkern, Matthew, Ginger Schultheis, and David Boylan. (2017).
Agentive modals. Philosophical Review, 126(3),
301–343. doi:10.1215/00318108-3878483
Mangan, Jean, Amanda Hughes, and Kim Slack. (2010). Student finance,
information and decision making. Higher Education,
60(5), 459–472. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9309-7
Manski, Charles F. (2017). Optimize, satisfice, or choose without
deliberation? A simple minimax-regret assessment. Theory and
Decision, 83(2), 155–173. doi:10.1007/s11238-017-9592-1
McGrath, Matthew. (2021). Being neutral: Agnosticism, inquiry and the
suspension of judgment. Noûs, 55(2),
463–484. doi:10.1111/nous.12323
McGrath, Matthew, and Brian Kim. (2019). Introduction. In Brian Kim
& Matthew McGrath (Eds.), Pragmatic encroachment in
epistemology (1–9). Routledge.
Melchior, Guido. (2019). Knowing and checking: An epistemological
investigation. Routledge.
Mercier, Hugo. (2020). Not born yesterday: The science of who we
trust and what we believe. Princeton University Press.
Nagel, Jennifer. (2010). Epistemic anxiety and adaptive invariantism.
Philosophical Perspectives, 24(1), 407–435. doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2010.00198.x
Nagel, Jennifer. (2013). Motivating Williamson’s model
Gettier cases. Inquiry, 56(1), 54–62.
doi:10.1080/0020174X.2013.775014
Nagel, Jennifer. (2014). Knowledge: A very short introduction.
Oxford University Press.
Nair, Shyam. (2019). Must good reasoning satisfy cumulative
transitivity? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,
98(1), 123–146. doi:10.1111/phpr.12431
Neta, Ram. (2007). Anti-intellectualism and the knowledge-action
principle. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,
75(1), 180–187. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00069.x
Newman, David B., Joanna Schug, Masaki Yuki, Junko Yamada, and John B.
Nezlek. (2018). The negative consequences of maximizing in friendship
selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
114(5), 804–824. doi:10.1037/pspp0000141
North, Jill. (2010). An empirical approach to symmetry and probability.
Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies In
History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41(1), 27–40.
doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2009.08.008
Nozick, Robert. (1981). Philosophical explorations. Harvard
University Press.
Odell, John S. (2002). Bounded rationality and world political economy.
In David M. Andrews, C. Randall Henning, & Louis W. Pauly (Eds.),
Governing the world’s money (168–193). Cornell University
Press.
Ogaki, Masao, and Saori C. Tanaka. (2017). Behavioral economics:
Toward a new economics by integration with traditional economics.
Springer.
Papi, Mario. (2013). Satisficing and maximizing consumers in a
monopolistic screening model. Mathematical Social Sciences,
66(3), 385–389. doi:10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2013.08.005
Pasnau, Robert. (2017). After certainty: A history of our epistemic
ideals and illusions. Oxford University Press.
Pingle, Mark. (2006). Deliberation cost as a foundation for behavioral
economics. In Morris Altman (Ed.), Handbook of contemporary
behavioral economics: Foundations and developments (340–355).
Routledge.
Pryor, James. (2004). What’s wrong with Moore’s argument?
Philosophical Issues, 14(1), 349–378. doi:10.1111/j.1533-6077.2004.00034.x
Quiggin, John. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of
Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(4), 323–343.
doi:10.1016/0167-2681(82)90008-7
Quong, Jonathan. (2018). Public Reason. In Edward N. Zalta
(Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy
(Spring 2018). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/public-reason/;
Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Railton, Peter. (1984). Alienation, consequentialism and the demands of
morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 13(2),
134–171.
Ramsey, Frank. (1990). General propositions and causality. In D. H.
Mellor (Ed.), Philosophical papers (145–163). Cambridge
University Press.
Reutskaja, Elena, Rosemarie Nagel, Colin F. Camerer, and Antonio Rangel.
(2011). Search dynamics in consumer choice under time pressure: An
eye-tracking study. American Economic Review, 101(2),
900–926. doi:10.1257/aer.101.2.900
Roberts, Craige. (2012). Information structure in discourse: Towards an
integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and
Pragmatics, 5(6), 1–69. doi:10.3765/sp.5.6
Ross, Jacob, and Mark Schroeder. (2014). Belief, credence, and pragmatic
encroachment. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,
88(2), 259–288. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00552.x
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. (1913). Social contract &
discourses (G. D. H. Cole, Trans.). J. M. Dent & Sons.
Russell, Gillian, and John M. Doris. (2009). Knowledge by indifference.
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 86(3), 429–437.
doi:10.1080/00048400802001996
Russell, Stuart J. (1997). Rationality and intelligence. Artificial
Intelligence, 94(1-2), 57–77. doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00026-X
Savage, Leonard. (1967). Difficulties in the theory of personal
probability. Philosophy of Science, 34(4), 305–310.
doi:10.1086/288168
Scheibehenne, Benjamin, Rainer Greifeneder, and Peter M. Todd. (2010).
Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice
overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3),
409–425. doi:10.1086/651235
Schmidt, Eva. (forthcoming). Reasons, attenuators, and virtue: A novel
account of pragmatic encroachment. Analytic Philosophy, 1–22.
doi:10.1111/phib.12314
Schoenfield, Miriam. (2013). Permission to believe: Why permissivism is
true and what it tells us about irrelevant influences on belief.
Noûs, 47(1), 193–218. doi:10.1111/nous.12006
Schroeder, Mark. (2009). Means-end coherence, stringency, and subjective
reasons. Philosophical Studies, 143(2), 223–248.
doi:10.1007/s11098-008-9200-x
Schroeder, Mark. (2012). Stakes, withholding and pragmatic encroachment
on knowledge. Philosophical Studies, 160(2), 265–285.
doi:10.1007/s11098-011-9718-1
Schwartz, Barry. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is
less. Harper Collins.
Schwartz, Barry, Andrew Ward, John Monterosso, Sonja Lyubomirsky,
Katherin White, and Darrin R. Lehman. (2002). Maximizing versus
satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1178–1197. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1178
Skyrms, Brian. (2001). The stag hunt. Proceedings and Addresses of
the American Philosophical Association, 75(2), 31–41.
doi:10.2307/3218711
Sosa, Ernest. (1999). How to defeat opposition to Moore.
Philosophical Perspectives, 13, 141–153. doi:10.1111/0029-4624.33.s13.7
Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo
Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre Wilson. (2010). Epistemic vigilance.
Mind and Language, 25(4), 359–393. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x
Staffel, Julia. (2019). How do beliefs simplify reasoning?
Noûs, 53(4), 937–962. doi:10.1111/nous.12254
Stalnaker, Robert. (1975). Indicative conditionals.
Philosophica, 5(3), 269–289. doi:10.1007/bf02379021
Stalnaker, Robert. (1984). Inquiry. MIT Press.
Stalnaker, Robert. (1994). On the evaluation of solution concepts.
Theory and Decision, 37(1), 49–73. doi:10.1007/BF01079205
Stalnaker, Robert. (1996). Knowledge, belief and counterfactual
reasoning in games. Economics and Philosophy, 12,
133–163. doi:10.1017/S0266267100004132
Stalnaker, Robert. (1998). Belief revision in games: Forward and
backward induction. Mathematical Social Sciences,
36(1), 31–56. doi:10.1016/S0165-4896(98)00007-9
Stalnaker, Robert. (1999). Extensive and strategic forms: Games and
models for games. Research in Economics, 53(3),
293–319. doi:10.1006/reec.1999.0200
Stanley, Jason. (2005). Knowledge and Practical
Interests. Oxford University Press.
Stanley, Jason. (2011). Know how. Oxford University Press.
Steglich-Petersen, Asbjørn. (2024). An instrumentalist explanation of
pragmatic encroachment. Analytic Philosophy, 65(3),
374–392. doi:10.1111/phib.12283
Strevens, Michael. (2020). The knowledge machine: How irrationality
created modern science. Liveright.
Tucker, Chris. (2016). Satisficing and motivated submaximization (in the
philosophy of religion). Philosophy and Phenomenological
Research, 93(1), 127–143. doi:10.1111/phpr.12191
Unger, Peter. (1975). Ignorance: A case for scepticism. Oxford
University Press.
Weatherson, Brian. (2005a). Can We Do Without Pragmatic
Encroachment? Philosophical Perspectives,
19(1), 417–443. doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2005.00068.x
Weatherson, Brian. (2005b). True, truer, truest. Philosophical
Studies, 123(1-2), 47–70. doi:10.1007/s11098-004-5218-x
Weatherson, Brian. (2011). Defending interest-relative invariantism.
Logos & Episteme, 2(4), 591–609. doi:10.5840/logos-episteme2011248
Weatherson, Brian. (2012). Knowledge, bets and interests. In Jessica
Brown & Mikkel Gerken (Eds.), Knowledge ascriptions
(75–103). Oxford University Press.
Weatherson, Brian. (2016a). Games, beliefs and credences. Philosophy
and Phenomenological Research, 92(2), 209–236. doi:10.1111/phpr.12088
Weatherson, Brian. (2016b). Reply to Eaton and
Pickavance. Philosophical Studies, 173(12),
3231–3233.
Weatherson, Brian. (2017). Interest-relative invariantism. In Jonathan
Ichikawa (Ed.), The routledge handbook of epistemic
contextualism (240–253). Routledge.
Weatherson, Brian. (2018). Interests, evidence and games.
Episteme, 15(3), 329–344.
Weatherson, Brian. (2019). Normative externalism. Oxford
University Press.
Weisberg, Jonathan. (2010). Bootstrapping in general. Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research, 81(3), 525–548. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00448.x
Weisberg, Jonathan. (2013). Knowledge in action. Philosophers’
Imprint, 13(22), 1–23. doi:2027/spo.3521354.0013.022
Weisberg, Jonathan. (2020). Belief in psyontology. Philosophers’
Imprint, xx–xx.
White, Roger. (2005). Epistemic permissiveness. Philosophical
Perspectives, 19, 445–459. doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2005.00069.x
Williams, Bernard. (1976). Persons, character and morality. In Amélie
Oksenberg Rorty (Ed.), The identities of persons (197–216).
University of California Press.
Williamson, Timothy. (1994). Vagueness. Routledge.
Williamson, Timothy. (2000). Knowledge and its
Limits. Oxford University Press.
Williamson, Timothy. (2005). Contextualism,
Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and Knowledge of Knowledge.
The Philosophical Quarterly, 55(219), 213–235. doi:10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00396.x
Williamson, Timothy. (2007). How probable is an infinite sequence of
heads? Analysis, 67(295), 173–180. doi:10.1093/analys/67.3.173
Williamson, Timothy. (2013). Gettier cases in epistemic logic.
Inquiry, 56(1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2013.775010
Williamson, Timothy. (2022). Knowledge, credence, and the strength of
belief. In Amy Flowerree & Baron Reed (Eds.), Expansive
epistemology: Norms, action, and the social world (xx–xx).
Routledge.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1953). Philosophical investigations.
Macmillan.
Woodard, Elise. (2024). Why double-check. Episteme,
21, 664–667. doi:10.1017/epi.2022.22
Wright, Crispin. (2002). (Anti-)sceptics simple and subtle: G.E. Moore and John McDowell. Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research, 65(2), 330–348. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00205.x
Wright, Crispin. (2018). A plague on all your houses: Some reflections
on the variable behaviour of "knows". In Annalisa Coliva, Paolo
Leonardi, & Sebastiano Moruzzi (Eds.), Eva picardi on language,
analysis and history (357–383). Palgrave Macmillan.
Wu, Jenny Yi-Chen. (forthcoming). A defense of impurist permissivism.
Episteme, 1–21. doi:10.1017/epi.2023.22
Yalcin, Seth. (2018). Belief as question-sensitive. Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research, 97(1), 23–47. doi:10.1111/phpr.12330
Yalcin, Seth. (2021). Fragmented but rational. In Christina Borgoni,
Dirk Kindermann, & Andrea Onofori (Eds.), The fragmented
mind (156–179). Oxford University Press.
Ye, Ru. (2024). Knowledge-action principles and threshold-impurism.
Erkenntnis, 89, 2215–2232. doi:10.1007/s10670-022-00626-7
Zweber, Adam. (2016). Fallibilism, closure, and pragmatic encroachment.
Philosophical Studies, 173(10), 2745–2757. doi:10.1007/s11098-016-0631-5