Some Data about Citation Trends

history of analytic
Author
Affiliation

University of Michigan

Published

June 25, 2024

Abstract

In the future I plan to write something substantive about trends in citations in philosophy journals. This is a presentation of some of the underlying data, with some small remarks about the big picture trends. (I earlier published a version of this that used data starting in 1976. I’ve now added 20 years more data.)

I recently downloaded citation data for 100 philosophy journals from Web of Science. This note presents some of the data about trends in citation patterns since 1956. My main interest here is in seeing which changes there have been in what was cited over time, but there are lots of interesting nuggets. In the future I’ll write more actually going into what some of the data mean, but for now I’m just presenting it for public consumption.

1 Methodology

1.1 The Articles Being Studied

Via the University of Michigan, I got the latest available database for Web of Science circa January 2024. I created a file of every citation where both the citing article and the cited article were from one of the 100 journals in Table 1, in the years that they were indexed by Web of Science. (I selected these journals as the most relevant to English language, analytic philosophy. I could be wrong about this list, and would be interested in suggestions about which should be included. The biggest omission is the Aristotelian Society, but Web of Science doesn’t index it.)

Table 1: The journals included in this study.
Journal Articles First Year Most Recent Year
American Philosophical Quarterly 1764 1964 2021
Analysis 2615 1975 2022
Analytic Philosophy 169 2016 2022
Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie 679 1975 2022
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1684 1975 2022
Biology and Philosophy 1149 1988 2022
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 761 2007 2022
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1519 1956 2022
British Journal of Aesthetics 1370 1975 2022
Bulletin Of Symbolic Logic 413 1997 2022
Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1504 1975 2022
Croatian Journal of Philosophy 330 2007 2022
Dialogue 1474 1975 2022
Economics and Philosophy 547 1986 2022
Episteme 551 2005 2022
Ergo 213 2016 2021
Erkenntnis 1744 2000 2022
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 854 2008 2022
Ethics 1599 1956 2022
Ethics and Information Technology 444 2001 2022
European Journal for Philosophy of Science 449 2011 2022
European Journal of Philosophy 919 1998 2022
History and Philosophy of Logic 478 1992 2022
Hypatia 604 2009 2022
Inquiry 1759 1966 2022
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1099 1975 2022
International Philosophical Quarterly 1548 1961 2022
Journal of Aesthetics And Art Criticism 1474 1975 2022
Journal of Applied Philosophy 598 2006 2022
Journal of Chinese Philosophy 1237 1973 2022
Journal of Consciousness Studies 1390 2000 2022
Journal of Indian Philosophy 1054 1975 2022
Journal of Medical Ethics 4235 1975 2022
Journal of Moral Philosophy 348 2005 2022
Journal of Philosophical Logic 1412 1972 2022
Journal of Philosophical Research 509 2005 2022
Journal of Philosophy 3869 1956 2022
Journal of Political Philosophy 592 1998 2022
Journal of Social Philosophy 481 2008 2022
Journal of Symbolic Logic 4247 1966 2022
Journal of Value Inquiry 1359 1980 2022
Journal of the American Philosophical Association 306 2015 2022
Journal of the History of Ideas 2132 1956 2022
Journal of the History of Philosophy 1087 1975 2022
Journal of the Philosophy Of History 240 2010 2022
Kant-Studien 1079 1975 2022
Kantian Review 294 2010 2022
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 551 1995 2022
Law and Philosophy 822 1982 2022
Linguistics and Philosophy 835 1979 2022
Logique et Analyse 340 2007 2021
Metaphilosophy 1475 1975 2022
Mind 1913 1956 2022
Mind and Language 846 1994 2022
Minds And Machines 674 1992 2022
Monist 1912 1963 2022
Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 424 2009 2022
Noûs 1452 1975 2022
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 1192 1980 2022
Philosophers’ Imprint 353 2010 2022
Philosophia 2055 1975 2022
Philosophia Mathematica 222 2008 2022
Philosophical Explorations 354 2008 2022
Philosophical Forum 806 1971 2022
Philosophical Investigations 676 1983 2022
Philosophical Papers 226 2009 2022
Philosophical Perspectives 277 2007 2022
Philosophical Psychology 1245 1991 2022
Philosophical Quarterly 1341 1975 2022
Philosophical Review 999 1956 2022
Philosophical Studies 5211 1956 2022
Philosophical Topics 107 1981 1986
Philosophy 1955 1956 2022
Philosophy & Public Affairs 701 1971 2022
Philosophy Compass 540 2015 2022
Philosophy East & West 1494 1966 2022
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 3157 1956 2022
Philosophy and Rhetoric 888 1975 2022
Philosophy of Science 3018 1956 2022
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 950 1975 2022
Phronesis 751 1975 2022
Politics, Philosophy & Economics 287 2008 2022
Ratio 1040 1974 2022
Res Philosophica 293 2013 2022
Review of Metaphysics 1576 1956 2022
Review of Symbolic Logic 535 2008 2022
Social Epistemology 423 2011 2022
Social Philosophy & Policy 897 1983 2021
South African Journal of Philosophy 729 1987 2022
Southern Journal of Philosophy 1905 1976 2022
Studia Logica 670 2010 2022
Studies In History And Philosophy of Science 1691 1974 2022
Synthese 7002 1966 2022
Theoria 397 2007 2022
Theory and Decision 1858 1970 2022
Thought 188 2016 2021
Topoi 1114 1982 2022
Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 1140 1975 2022
Utilitas 360 2009 2022

Of course the first year isn’t the first year the journal started publishing; it’s when Web of Science started indexing them. And the last year isn’t when they ceased publishing; it’s the most recent year indexed. Web of Science is very slow at adding journals, and at adding volumes. But it is, as far as I’ve found, pretty accurate within what it adds.

One big exception to this is that it’s never really understood how to handle the ‘supplements’ to Noûs, i.e., Philosophical Perspectives and Philosophical Issues. Some of these are recorded as being their own thing, some of them are recorded as special issues of Noûs. In the latter case, the citations often only start being tracked several years after publication, and the bibliographic information is spotty. I’ve manually removed the ones that were listed as being published in Noûs but actually in one of the supplements, because the data didn’t seem sufficiently reliable.

I’ve also manually added citations to articles published in Journal of Philosophy between 1971 and 1974. I don’t have good data for what was cited in those articles. I don’t know why Web of Science indexes the Journal before and after that period, but it’s an important gap. Several of the most important articles of the journals era are published in the Journal in those years, so I felt it was important to include them. I hope that the manual adding I did led to values on the same scale as what I got from everything else, but this is a possible source of noise in the data.

Because Web of Science keeps adding journals, and journals keep getting larger, the number of articles in this study keeps going up. The only downward pressure comes from the fact that some journals haven’t been indexed for 2022 or even, in some cases, 2021. Figure 1 shows how many articles each year are in the study.

Figure 1: Number of articles in the study each year

On top of that, citation practices have changed and people now cite much more widely than they used to. So the number of citations recorded each year (to articles since 1956 indexed in these 100 journals), has risen rather dramatically, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Number of citations to articles in the study each year

On the other hand, since the overwhelming majority of citations are to articles published earlier than the citing article, a larger number of citations in total might be consistent with fewer citations per article available to be cited. If we somewhat arbitrarily set the universe of possible cited papers to be the set of papers with the same publication date as the citing article or earlier, Figure 3 shows how often the average paper was cited each year (in these 100 journals).

Figure 3: Average number of citations per available article in each each year

Between about 1978 and 2004, the different forces are roughly balanced. There are more papers, and each paper cites more often, but there are more papers available to be cited, and the mean stays at about 0.1. (Of course articles do get cited outside of journals indexed in Web of Science, but it’s still a bit humbling to realise that’s the historical average, even if one gets published in a journal as good as one of these.) But then the forces pushing this number up take over. This is important context for a lot of the graphs below, where the typical article will have a graph of citations per year that looks a bit like this.

1.2 The Focus

For each year up to 2020, I made three lists. (After 2020 the citation data is all too new to be particularly useful I think.) First, a list of the articles published that year sorted by how many times they are cited. Second, the same list sorted by how many times they are cited in what I call early years. That’s either the first ten years after publication, or half of the time between publication and 2022, whichever is shorter. Third, the same list sorted by how many times they are cited in what I call late years, which is either the last ten years of the study, or the years since publication that are not ‘early’, again whichever is shorter. Given how many of the citations come from the last few years, the first and third lists overlap a lot. As we get closer to the end of the study, the early cites tend to be very volatile, and there is a bit of impact from how easy journals made it for their papers to be cited prior to official publication through online early access.

After making those three lists, I found the largest n such that taking the top n from those three lists gave me nine total articles per year. (If forced to choose, I chose the articles with the most total citations.) So we got a mix largely of highly cited articles, and articles that were highly cited soon after publication. With nine articles each year, and sixty-five years between 1956 and 2020, we should end up with 585 articles.

Having built that list, I decided that articles with fewer than thirty-four citations (in these 100 journals) were not cited often enough that it made much sense to talk about trends in their citation pattern. So I filtered the list down to only include articles with thirty-four or more citations. The result is that we have 660 articles in total.

The 660 articles are, for better and for worse, a pretty representative sample of what was happening in those journals, and in particular what was being widely talked about in those journals. They wouldn’t match up with my list of the best 660 articles from those sixty-five years, or I suspect anyone else’s list of the best 660 articles. But I do think they are an interesting model of the field as it was across those years.

It was not a surprise that the famously high prestige journals have the bulk of these articles. But there was more variation within the list than some may have expected, as we see in Table 2.

Table 2: Which journals the 660 articles appeared in.
Journal Articles
Journal of Philosophy 266
Philosophical Review 64
Philosophical Studies 40
Noûs 35
Mind 31
Philosophy of Science 27
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 25
Ethics 19
American Philosophical Quarterly 16
Philosophy & Public Affairs 14
Synthese 13
Philosophical Quarterly 11
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 10
Journal of Philosophical Logic 10
Analysis 8
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 8
Monist 6
Linguistics and Philosophy 5
Inquiry 4
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 4
Philosophers’ Imprint 4
Journal of Symbolic Logic 3
Mind and Language 3
Philosophical Psychology 3
Philosophy 3
Biology and Philosophy 2
Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2
Erkenntnis 2
Hypatia 2
Metaphilosophy 2
Philosophical Perspectives 2
Ratio 2
Review of Metaphysics 2
Studies In History And Philosophy of Science 2
Economics and Philosophy 1
Episteme 1
Journal of Consciousness Studies 1
Journal of Medical Ethics 1
Journal of Political Philosophy 1
Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1
Philosophia 1
Philosophy Compass 1
Social Epistemology 1
Social Philosophy & Policy 1

Around half the articles (130 out of 660) are in the journals widely taken to be the big five: Journal of Philosophy, Philosophical Review, Mind, Noûs, and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Table 3 shows what happens if we restrict attention to just the last fifteen years, and look at which articles from 2006 to 2020 are widely cited in this sense. The percentage that are in these five journals falls slightly: it is now 35 out of 120. And the order at the top has changed a bit, as Table 3 shows.

Table 3: Which journals the most recent 120 articles appeared in.
Journal Articles
Noûs 19
Philosophical Studies 18
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 10
Mind 8
Philosophical Review 8
Journal of Philosophy 7
Synthese 6
Inquiry 4
Philosophers’ Imprint 4
Philosophical Quarterly 4
Ethics 3
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 2
Biology and Philosophy 2
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2
Erkenntnis 2
Hypatia 2
Journal of Philosophical Logic 2
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 2
Philosophical Perspectives 2
Philosophy of Science 2
Episteme 1
Journal of Consciousness Studies 1
Journal of Medical Ethics 1
Journal of Political Philosophy 1
Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1
Metaphilosophy 1
Mind and Language 1
Monist 1
Philosophical Psychology 1
Philosophy Compass 1
Social Epistemology 1

One thing we see from Table 2 and Table 3 is that Philosophical Studies is a very important journal; it publishes more widely cited articles than some of the traditionally more prestigious journals. Now partially that is because it publishes more articles full stop. But other journals (e.g., Synthese and Erkenntnis) also publish a lot of articles without appearing near the top of these tables.

1.3 Short Observations

In longer work I plan to make a lot of notes about the data that’s presented here. But for now I’ll just note a few things about changes in the citation patterns over the last forty years.

There are a few reasons that articles might be widely cited immediately after they come out, and then not so widely cited after a few years.

  • The article might get turned into a book, and people simply cite the book. You can see that happening in the data below with articles by Ted Sider, by John MacFarlane, and by Timothy Williamson, for example. It’s not part of this study, but not that many people cite Lewis’s 1973 paper on counterfactuals, because they mostly cite his 1973 book on counterfactuals. But books don’t always soak up the citations that papers would otherwise have received. People didn’t take the discussion of natural properties in Plurality to mean they should stop citing “New Work”. Jason Stanley and Timothy Williamson’s paper on knowing how gets more citations after Stanley’s book on know how comes out. Still, it is one relatively mundane reason that a paper doesn’t get much attention.
  • The article might simply get superseded. This can happen with technical papers in particular. If a paper has some useful technical developments, but they are incorporated into later and better work, perhaps people just stop citing the earlier work.
  • If the article is a negative article, it might simply convince people not to pay attention to a particular debate. I suspect this happens a bit, but it’s hard to find clear cases of it. People didn’t stop citing Sense and Sensibilia when they decided sense-data theory had been a mistake, and I suspect that’s the more usual situation.

Sometimes articles stop getting cited because the philosophical fashion moves on, and they seem like a relic of an earlier age. You really see this in the data below with articles about supervenience. Now I’m enough of an old fashioned intensionalist to think that getting clear on the different kinds of supervenience is in fact a worthwhile project. But the discipline as a whole doesn’t really agree. Nobody is citing the work, especially the early work, on different concepts of supervenience.

What would have been even more shocking to me thirty years ago is how little attention is paid in the journals now to debates about content externalism. That felt like the most important debate in philosophy for so long, and now it simply isn’t.

From the other direction, what has picked up the attention? There are two important things to look at here: new topics, and topics that get more attention now than they used to. The first one is easy: the big new topics at the end of the data set are conceptual engineering and grounding. The second is, to my mind, more interesting.

There are two categories of articles that stand out immediately among the papers that are more widely cited now than when they first came out.

The biggest of these is social philosophy. In this I’m including Rae Langton’s 1993 article on silencing, Sally Haslanger’s 2000 Noûs article on race and gender, and Kristie Dotson’s 2011 article on epistemic violence. But I’m also including things like Michael Bratman’s 1992 and 1993 articles on collective action. It’s a bit of a stretch, but one might also see the various articles on trust that show up below (by Annette Baier, Richard Holton, and Karen Jones), as being of the move towards more social philosophy. Philosophy in the twentieth century was very focussed on individuals; there is much more attention now to groups and societies.

The other category is papers on probability. Some papers from the 1990s, such as Richard Foley’s 1992 paper that set out the Lockean theory of belief, and Jim Joyce’s 1998 paper setting up the accuracy-dominance approach, are much more widely discussed now than they were immediately after they came out.

1.4 Future Goals

I’m very interested to hear ideas other people have for what might be done with this data, and surrounding data. Here are some of the ideas I have for future research.

  • Creating a table of when the frequently cited articles were cited together, and looking for clusters in that data.
  • Separating out age, cohort, and period effects among the various trends shown here.
  • Looking at whether, at it appears by eyeballing the data, that from 1980-1995 journal articles (not written by David Lewis) tended to be cited less often than articles from either side of that range.
  • Seeing what connections there are between paper length and number of citations.
  • Using the citation data to get a better sense of the rise and fall of the ‘modal era’ in philosophy, where tools involving possible worlds were central to so many discussions.
  • Looking at the rise of social philosophy post-2010, and how that relates to the fall off in interest in modality.

But there are lots of other stories here to be investigated, and I’d love to hear what other ideas people have for what could be done with it.

2 The Articles

Articles
Willard van Orman Quine (1956) “Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes”
Gottlob Frege (1956) “The Thought: A Logical Inquiry”
H. P. Grice and P. F. Strawson (1956) “In Defense of a Dogma”
John G. Kemeny and Paul Oppenheim (1956) “On Reduction”
H. P. Grice (1957) “Meaning”
Zeno Vendler (1957) “Verbs and Times”
G. E. M. Anscombe (1958) “Modern Moral Philosophy”
John R. Searle (1958) “Proper Names”
John Rawls (1958) “Justice as Fairness”
Stuart Hampshire and H. L. A. Hart (1958) “Decision, Intention and Certainty”
J. J. C. Smart (1959) “Sensations and Brain Processes”
Frank Sibley (1959) “Aesthetic Concepts”
A. N. Prior (1959) “Thank Goodness That”s Over”
Karl R. Popper (1959) “The Propensity Interpretation of Probability”
Michael Dummett (1959) “Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Mathematics”
Peter T. Geach (1960) “Ascriptivism”
Norman Malcolm (1960) “Anselm’s Ontological Arguments”
J. J. C. Smart (1961) “Free-Will, Praise and Blame”
J. R. Lucas (1961) “Minds, Machines and Gödel”
I. J. Good (1961) “A Causal Calculus (I)”
Hilary Putnam (1962) “It Ain’t Necessarily So”
E. J. Lemmon (1962) “Moral Dilemmas”
John R. Searle (1962) “Meaning and Speech Acts”
Jaako Hintikka (1962) “Cogito, Ergo Sum: Inference or Performance?”
Arthur Danto (1964) “The Artworld”
P. F. Strawson (1964) “Intention and Convention in Speech Acts”
John R. Searle (1964) “How To Derive Ought From Is”
Michael Dummett (1964) “Bringing About the Past”
George Dickie (1964) “The Myth of the Aesthetic Attitude”
Paul Benacerraf (1965) “What Numbers Could Not Be”
Gilbert Harman (1965) “The Inference To the Best Explanation”
Peter T. Geach (1965) “Assertion”
J. L. Mackie (1965) “Causes and Conditions”
Richard Rorty (1965) “Mind-Body Identity, Privacy, and Categories”
David L. Hull (1965) “The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy: 2000 Years of Stasis (I)”
Frank Sibley (1965) “Aesthetic and Non-Aesthetic”
Joel Feinberg (1965) “The Expressive Function of Punishment”
Keith S. Donnellan (1966) “Reference and Definite Descriptions”
David Lewis (1966) “An Argument for the Identity Theory”
C. B. Martin and Max Deutscher (1966) “Remembering”
Bas C. van Fraassen (1966) “Singular Terms, Truth-Value Gaps, and Free Logic”
Jaegwon Kim (1966) “On the Psycho-Physical Identity Theory”
Roderick M. Chisholm and Ernest Sosa (1966) “Logic of Intrinsically Better”
Donald Davidson (1967b) “Truth and Meaning”
Alvin I. Goldman (1967) “A Causal Theory of Knowing”
Donald Davidson (1967a) “Causal Relations”
Hector-Neri Castañeda (1967) “Indicators and Quasi-Indicators”
Kenneth F. Schaffner (1967) “Approaches To Reduction”
Hilary Putnam (1967) “Time and Physical Geometry”
Ian Hacking (1967b) “Slightly More Realistic Personal Probability”
Ian Hacking (1967a) “Possibility”
David Lewis (1968) “Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic”
Sydney Shoemaker (1968) “Self-Reference and Self-Awareness”
Barry Stroud (1968) “Transcendental Arguments”
Peter Unger (1968) “An Analysis of Factual Knowledge”
Herbert Morris (1968) “Persons and Punishment”
Willard van Orman Quine (1968) “Ontological Relativity”
Bas C. van Fraassen (1968) “Presupposition, Implication, and Self-Reference”
Gilbert Harman (1968) “Knowledge, Inference, and Explanation”
Harry G. Frankfurt (1969) “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility”
H. P. Grice (1969) “Utterer’s Meaning and Intentions”
Keith Lehrer and Thomas Paxson Jr. (1969) “Knowledge: Undefeated Justified True Belief”
Bas C. van Fraassen (1969) “Facts and Tautological Entailments”
J. A. Goguen (1969) “The Logic of Inexact Concepts”
Fred Dretske (1970) “Epistemic Operators”
David Lewis (1970) “How To Define Theoretical Terms”
Kendall L. Walton (1970) “Categories of Art”
Robert C. Stalnaker (1970) “Probability and Conditionals”
Sydney Shoemaker (1970) “Persons and Their Pasts”
Willard van Orman Quine (1970) “On the Reasons for Indeterminacy of Translation”
Bas C. van Fraassen (1970) “On Extension of Beths Semantics of Physical Theories”
Richard Rorty (1970) “Incorrigibility as Mark of Mental”
Harry G. Frankfurt (1971) “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person”
Harry G. Frankfurt (1971) “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person”
Harry G. Frankfurt (1971) “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person”
Harry G. Frankfurt (1971) “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person”
Harry G. Frankfurt (1971) “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person”
Harry G. Frankfurt (1971) “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person”
Daniel C. Dennett (1971) “Intentional Systems”
Daniel C. Dennett (1971) “Intentional Systems”
Daniel C. Dennett (1971) “Intentional Systems”
Daniel C. Dennett (1971) “Intentional Systems”
Daniel C. Dennett (1971) “Intentional Systems”
Daniel C. Dennett (1971) “Intentional Systems”
David Lewis (1971) “Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies”
David Lewis (1971) “Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies”
David Lewis (1971) “Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies”
David Lewis (1971) “Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies”
David Lewis (1971) “Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies”
David Lewis (1971) “Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies”
George Boolos (1971) “The Iterative Conception of Set”
George Boolos (1971) “The Iterative Conception of Set”
George Boolos (1971) “The Iterative Conception of Set”
George Boolos (1971) “The Iterative Conception of Set”
George Boolos (1971) “The Iterative Conception of Set”
George Boolos (1971) “The Iterative Conception of Set”
Peter D. Klein (1971) “A Proposed Definition of Propositional Knowledge”
Peter D. Klein (1971) “A Proposed Definition of Propositional Knowledge”
Peter D. Klein (1971) “A Proposed Definition of Propositional Knowledge”
Peter D. Klein (1971) “A Proposed Definition of Propositional Knowledge”
Peter D. Klein (1971) “A Proposed Definition of Propositional Knowledge”
Peter D. Klein (1971) “A Proposed Definition of Propositional Knowledge”
Alvin I. Goldman (1971) “The Individuation of Action”
Alvin I. Goldman (1971) “The Individuation of Action”
Alvin I. Goldman (1971) “The Individuation of Action”
Alvin I. Goldman (1971) “The Individuation of Action”
Alvin I. Goldman (1971) “The Individuation of Action”
Alvin I. Goldman (1971) “The Individuation of Action”
Judith Jarvis Thomson (1971b) “The Time of a Killing”
Judith Jarvis Thomson (1971b) “The Time of a Killing”
Judith Jarvis Thomson (1971b) “The Time of a Killing”
Judith Jarvis Thomson (1971b) “The Time of a Killing”
Judith Jarvis Thomson (1971b) “The Time of a Killing”
Judith Jarvis Thomson (1971b) “The Time of a Killing”
Judith Jarvis Thomson (1971a) “A Defense of Abortion”
Keith Lehrer (1971) “How Reasons Give Us Knowledge, or the Case of the Gypsy Lawyer”
Keith Lehrer (1971) “How Reasons Give Us Knowledge, or the Case of the Gypsy Lawyer”
Keith Lehrer (1971) “How Reasons Give Us Knowledge, or the Case of the Gypsy Lawyer”
Keith Lehrer (1971) “How Reasons Give Us Knowledge, or the Case of the Gypsy Lawyer”
Keith Lehrer (1971) “How Reasons Give Us Knowledge, or the Case of the Gypsy Lawyer”
Keith Lehrer (1971) “How Reasons Give Us Knowledge, or the Case of the Gypsy Lawyer”
Hartry Field (1972) “Tarski’s Theory of Truth”
Hartry Field (1972) “Tarski’s Theory of Truth”
Hartry Field (1972) “Tarski’s Theory of Truth”
Hartry Field (1972) “Tarski’s Theory of Truth”
Hartry Field (1972) “Tarski’s Theory of Truth”
Hartry Field (1972) “Tarski’s Theory of Truth”
Peter Singer (1972) “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”
John Perry (1972) “Can the Self Divide?”
John Perry (1972) “Can the Self Divide?”
John Perry (1972) “Can the Self Divide?”
John Perry (1972) “Can the Self Divide?”
John Perry (1972) “Can the Self Divide?”
John Perry (1972) “Can the Self Divide?”
Richard Rorty (1972) “The World Well Lost”
Richard Rorty (1972) “The World Well Lost”
Richard Rorty (1972) “The World Well Lost”
Richard Rorty (1972) “The World Well Lost”
Richard Rorty (1972) “The World Well Lost”
Richard Rorty (1972) “The World Well Lost”
Thompson Clarke (1972) “The Legacy of Skepticism”
Thompson Clarke (1972) “The Legacy of Skepticism”
Thompson Clarke (1972) “The Legacy of Skepticism”
Thompson Clarke (1972) “The Legacy of Skepticism”
Thompson Clarke (1972) “The Legacy of Skepticism”
Thompson Clarke (1972) “The Legacy of Skepticism”
Robert L. Causey (1972) “Attribute-Identities in Microreductions”
Robert L. Causey (1972) “Attribute-Identities in Microreductions”
Robert L. Causey (1972) “Attribute-Identities in Microreductions”
Robert L. Causey (1972) “Attribute-Identities in Microreductions”
Robert L. Causey (1972) “Attribute-Identities in Microreductions”
Robert L. Causey (1972) “Attribute-Identities in Microreductions”
Philippa Foot (1972) “Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives”
Richard Brandt (1972) “Rationality, Egoism, and Morality”
Richard Brandt (1972) “Rationality, Egoism, and Morality”
Richard Brandt (1972) “Rationality, Egoism, and Morality”
Richard Brandt (1972) “Rationality, Egoism, and Morality”
Richard Brandt (1972) “Rationality, Egoism, and Morality”
Richard Brandt (1972) “Rationality, Egoism, and Morality”
Marshall Swain (1972) “Knowledge, Causality, and Justification”
Marshall Swain (1972) “Knowledge, Causality, and Justification”
Marshall Swain (1972) “Knowledge, Causality, and Justification”
Marshall Swain (1972) “Knowledge, Causality, and Justification”
Marshall Swain (1972) “Knowledge, Causality, and Justification”
Marshall Swain (1972) “Knowledge, Causality, and Justification”
David Lewis (1973) “Causation”
David Lewis (1973) “Causation”
David Lewis (1973) “Causation”
David Lewis (1973) “Causation”
David Lewis (1973) “Causation”
David Lewis (1973) “Causation”
Paul Benacerraf (1973) “Mathematical Truth”
Paul Benacerraf (1973) “Mathematical Truth”
Paul Benacerraf (1973) “Mathematical Truth”
Paul Benacerraf (1973) “Mathematical Truth”
Paul Benacerraf (1973) “Mathematical Truth”
Paul Benacerraf (1973) “Mathematical Truth”
Hilary Putnam (1973) “Meaning and Reference”
Hilary Putnam (1973) “Meaning and Reference”
Hilary Putnam (1973) “Meaning and Reference”
Hilary Putnam (1973) “Meaning and Reference”
Hilary Putnam (1973) “Meaning and Reference”
Hilary Putnam (1973) “Meaning and Reference”
Hartry Field (1973) “Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference”
Hartry Field (1973) “Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference”
Hartry Field (1973) “Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference”
Hartry Field (1973) “Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference”
Hartry Field (1973) “Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference”
Hartry Field (1973) “Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference”
Jaegwon Kim (1973) “Causation, Nomic Subsumption, and the Concept of Event”
Jaegwon Kim (1973) “Causation, Nomic Subsumption, and the Concept of Event”
Jaegwon Kim (1973) “Causation, Nomic Subsumption, and the Concept of Event”
Jaegwon Kim (1973) “Causation, Nomic Subsumption, and the Concept of Event”
Jaegwon Kim (1973) “Causation, Nomic Subsumption, and the Concept of Event”
Jaegwon Kim (1973) “Causation, Nomic Subsumption, and the Concept of Event”
Tyler Burge (1973) “Reference and Proper Names”
Tyler Burge (1973) “Reference and Proper Names”
Tyler Burge (1973) “Reference and Proper Names”
Tyler Burge (1973) “Reference and Proper Names”
Tyler Burge (1973) “Reference and Proper Names”
Tyler Burge (1973) “Reference and Proper Names”
Bas C. Van Fraassen (1973) “Values and the Heart’s Command”
Bas C. Van Fraassen (1973) “Values and the Heart’s Command”
Bas C. Van Fraassen (1973) “Values and the Heart’s Command”
Bas C. Van Fraassen (1973) “Values and the Heart’s Command”
Bas C. Van Fraassen (1973) “Values and the Heart’s Command”
Bas C. Van Fraassen (1973) “Values and the Heart’s Command”
Barbara Hall Partee (1973) “Some Structural Analogies Between Tenses and Pronouns in English”
Barbara Hall Partee (1973) “Some Structural Analogies Between Tenses and Pronouns in English”
Barbara Hall Partee (1973) “Some Structural Analogies Between Tenses and Pronouns in English”
Barbara Hall Partee (1973) “Some Structural Analogies Between Tenses and Pronouns in English”
Barbara Hall Partee (1973) “Some Structural Analogies Between Tenses and Pronouns in English”
Barbara Hall Partee (1973) “Some Structural Analogies Between Tenses and Pronouns in English”
Richard Grandy (1973) “Reference, Meaning, and Belief”
Richard Grandy (1973) “Reference, Meaning, and Belief”
Richard Grandy (1973) “Reference, Meaning, and Belief”
Richard Grandy (1973) “Reference, Meaning, and Belief”
Richard Grandy (1973) “Reference, Meaning, and Belief”
Richard Grandy (1973) “Reference, Meaning, and Belief”
Michael Friedman (1974) “Explanation and Scientific Understanding”
Michael Friedman (1974) “Explanation and Scientific Understanding”
Michael Friedman (1974) “Explanation and Scientific Understanding”
Michael Friedman (1974) “Explanation and Scientific Understanding”
Michael Friedman (1974) “Explanation and Scientific Understanding”
Michael Friedman (1974) “Explanation and Scientific Understanding”
Isaac Levi (1974) “On Indeterminate Probabilities”
Isaac Levi (1974) “On Indeterminate Probabilities”
Isaac Levi (1974) “On Indeterminate Probabilities”
Isaac Levi (1974) “On Indeterminate Probabilities”
Isaac Levi (1974) “On Indeterminate Probabilities”
Isaac Levi (1974) “On Indeterminate Probabilities”
Thomas Nagel (1974) “What is It Like To Be a Bat”
Michael Devitt (1974) “Singular Terms”
Michael Devitt (1974) “Singular Terms”
Michael Devitt (1974) “Singular Terms”
Michael Devitt (1974) “Singular Terms”
Michael Devitt (1974) “Singular Terms”
Michael Devitt (1974) “Singular Terms”
Tyler Burge (1974) “Demonstrative Constructions, Reference, and Truth”
Tyler Burge (1974) “Demonstrative Constructions, Reference, and Truth”
Tyler Burge (1974) “Demonstrative Constructions, Reference, and Truth”
Tyler Burge (1974) “Demonstrative Constructions, Reference, and Truth”
Tyler Burge (1974) “Demonstrative Constructions, Reference, and Truth”
Tyler Burge (1974) “Demonstrative Constructions, Reference, and Truth”
Richard C. Jeffrey (1974) “Preference Among Preferences”
Richard C. Jeffrey (1974) “Preference Among Preferences”
Richard C. Jeffrey (1974) “Preference Among Preferences”
Richard C. Jeffrey (1974) “Preference Among Preferences”
Richard C. Jeffrey (1974) “Preference Among Preferences”
Richard C. Jeffrey (1974) “Preference Among Preferences”
Terence Parsons (1974) “A Prolegomenon to Meinongian Semantics”
Terence Parsons (1974) “A Prolegomenon to Meinongian Semantics”
Terence Parsons (1974) “A Prolegomenon to Meinongian Semantics”
Terence Parsons (1974) “A Prolegomenon to Meinongian Semantics”
Terence Parsons (1974) “A Prolegomenon to Meinongian Semantics”
Terence Parsons (1974) “A Prolegomenon to Meinongian Semantics”
Louis E. Loeb (1974) “Causal Theories and Causal Overdetermination”
Louis E. Loeb (1974) “Causal Theories and Causal Overdetermination”
Louis E. Loeb (1974) “Causal Theories and Causal Overdetermination”
Louis E. Loeb (1974) “Causal Theories and Causal Overdetermination”
Louis E. Loeb (1974) “Causal Theories and Causal Overdetermination”
Louis E. Loeb (1974) “Causal Theories and Causal Overdetermination”
Charles Parsons (1974) “The Liar Paradox”
Saul Kripke (1975) “Outline of a Theory of Truth”
Robert Cummins (1975) “Functional Analysis”
Gary Watson (1975) “Free Agency”
Allan Gibbard (1975) “Contingent Identity”
Robert C. Stalnaker (1975) “Indicative Conditionals”
Gilbert Harman (1975) “Moral Relativism Defended”
Dorothy L. Grover, Joseph L. Camp Jr., and Nuel D. Belnap Jr. (1975) “A Pro-Sentential Theory of Truth”
Geoffrey Paul Hellman and Frank Wilson Thompson (1975) “Physicalism: Ontology, Determination, and Reduction”
David Kaplan (1975) “Sets, Concepts and Extensions: How To Russell a Frege-Church”
Alvin I. Goldman (1976) “Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge”
David Lewis (1976b) “Probabilities of Conditionals and Conditional Probabilities”
David Lewis (1976a) “Paradoxes of Time Travel”
Michael Stocker (1976) “The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories”
Gilbert Harman (1976) “Practical Reasoning”
Robert C. Stalnaker (1976) “Possible Worlds”
J. Michael Dunn (1976) “Intuitive Semantics for First-Degree Entailments and Coupled Trees”
Robert Merrihew Adams (1976) “Motive Utilitarianism”
Brian Loar (1976) “The Semantics of Singular Terms”
John Perry (1977) “Frege on Demonstratives”
Stephen L. Darwall (1977) “Two Kinds of Respect”
Fred Dretske (1977) “Laws of Nature”
Michael Tooley (1977) “Nature of Laws”
John M. Taurek (1977) “Should the Numbers Count?”
Tyler Burge (1977) “Belief De Re”
Christopher Boorse (1977) “Health as a Theoretical Concept”
Hartry Field (1977) “Logic, Meaning, and Conceptual Role”
Hector-Neri Castañeda (1977) “Perception, Belief, and Structure of Physical Objects and Consciousness”
David Lewis (1978) “Truth in Fiction”
David L. Hull (1978) “A Matter of Individuality”
Kendall L. Walton (1978) “Fearing Fictions”
Stephen P. Stich (1978) “Beliefs and Subdoxastic States”
Harry G. Frankfurt (1978) “The Problem of Action”
Paul R. Thagard (1978) “The Best Explanation: Criteria for Theory Choice”
Jaegwon Kim (1978) “Supervenience and Nomological Incommensurables”
Laurence BonJour (1978) “Can Empirical Knowledge Have a Foundation?”
Gregory S. Kavka (1978) “Some Paradoxes of Deterrence”
John Perry (1979) “The Problem of the Essential Indexical”
David Lewis (1979a) “Attitudes De Dicto and De Se”
David Lewis (1979c) “Scorekeeping in a Language Game”
David Lewis (1979b) “Counterfactual Dependence and Time’s Arrow”
John McDowell (1979) “Virtue and Reason”
Graham Priest (1979) “The Logic of Paradox”
Norman Daniels (1979) “Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics”
Nancy Cartwright (1979) “Causal Laws and Effective Strategies”
Daniel Lascar and Bruno Poizat (1979) “Introduction To Forking”
John Rawls (1980) “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory”
Martin Davies and Lloyd Humberstone (1980) “Two Notions of Necessity”
Hilary Putnam (1980) “Models and Reality”
Jerrold Levinson (1980) “What a Musical Work Is”
Elliot Sober (1980) “Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism”
Ruth Barcan Marcus (1980) “Moral Dilemmas and Consistency”
David Lewis (1980) “Veridical Hallucination and Prosthetic Vision”
Norman Daniels (1980) “Reflective Equilibrium and Archimedean Points”
Paul M. Churchland (1981) “Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes”
Larry Laudan (1981) “A Confutation of Convergent Realism”
Philip Kitcher (1981) “Explanatory Unification”
Jon Barwise and Robin Cooper (1981) “Generalized Quantifiers and Natural-Language”
Ronald Dworkin (1981b) “What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources”
David Lewis (1981) “Causal Decision Theory”
Peter van Inwagen (1981) “The Doctrine of Arbitrary Undetached Parts”
Ronald Dworkin (1981a) “What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare”
John Dupré (1981) “Natural Kinds and Biological Taxa”
Frank Jackson (1982) “Epiphenomenal Qualia”
Susan Wolf (1982) “Moral Saints”
Elizabeth W. Prior, Robert Pargetter, and Frank Jackson (1982) “Three Theses About Dispositions”
Chris Swoyer (1982) “The Nature of Natural Laws”
Anil Gupta (1982) “Truth and Paradox”
David Lewis (1982) “Logic for Equivocators”
Jaegwon Kim (1982) “Psychophysical Supervenience”
Harry G. Frankfurt (1982) “The Importance of What We Care About”
Dudley Shapere (1982) “The Concept of Observation in Science and Philosophy”
David Lewis (1983) “New Work for a Theory of Universals”
Joseph Levine (1983) “Materialism and Qualia: The Explanatory Gap”
Gregory S. Kavka (1983) “The Toxin Puzzle”
Christine M. Korsgaard (1983) “Two Distinctions in Goodness”
Robert Brandom (1983) “Asserting”
Judith Jarvis Thomson (1983) “Parthood and Identity Across Time”
Hilary Kornblith (1983) “Justified Belief and Epistemically Responsible Action”
Alvin Plantinga (1983) “On Existentialism”
Ellery Eells and Elliot Sober (1983) “Probabilistic Causality and the Question of Transitivity”
David Lewis (1984) “Putnam’s Paradox”
Bas C. van Fraassen (1984) “Belief and the Will”
Peter Railton (1984) “Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality”
George Boolos (1984) “To Be is To Be a Value of a Variable (Or To Be Some Values of Some Variables)”
Jaegwon Kim (1984) “Concepts of Supervenience”
Stewart Cohen (1984) “Justification and Truth”
Philip Kitcher (1984) “Species”
Kevin Mulligan, Peter Simons, and Barry Smith (1984) “Truth-Makers”
Jerry A. Fodor (1984) “Observation Reconsidered”
Carlos E. Alchourrón, Peter Gärdenfors, and David Makinson (1985) “On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Contraction and Revision Functions”
Richard Feldman and Earl Conee (1985) “Evidentialism”
John Hardwig (1985) “Epistemic Dependence”
Ernan McMullin (1985) “Galilean Idealization”
Vann McGee (1985) “A Counterexample To Modus Ponens”
John Rawls (1985) “Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical”
William P. Alston (1985) “Concepts of Epistemic Justification”
Richard Feldman (1985) “Reliability and Justification”
Paul M. Churchland (1985) “Reduction, Qualia, and the Direct Introspection of Brain States”
Peter Railton (1986) “Moral Realism”
Tyler Burge (1986a) “Individualism and Psychology”
Annette Baier (1986) “Trust and Antitrust”
Christine M. Korsgaard (1986) “Skepticism About Practical Reason”
David M. Rosenthal (1986) “Two Concepts of Consciousness”
Frank Jackson and Robert Pargetter (1986) “Oughts, Options, and Actualism”
Tyler Burge (1986b) “Intellectual Norms and Foundations of Mind”
Ruth Garrett Millikan (1986) “Thoughts Without Laws, Cognitive Science With Content”
Michael Smith (1987) “The Humean Theory of Motivation”
Harry G. Frankfurt (1987) “Equality as a Moral Ideal”
John Bigelow and Robert Pargetter (1987) “Functions”
John Earman and John Norton (1987) “What Price Spacetime Substantivalism: The Hole Story”
Dennis W. Stampe (1987) “The Authority of Desire”
Larry S. Temkin (1987) “Intransitivity and the Mere Addition Paradox”
Thomas Nagel (1987) “Moral Conflict and Political Legitimacy”
Margaret Gilbert (1987) “Modeling Collective Belief”
Larry Laudan (1987) “Progress or Rationality: The Prospects for Normative Naturalism”
Tyler Burge (1988) “Individualism and Self-Knowledge”
James Bogen and James Woodward (1988) “Saving the Phenomena”
Adam Grove (1988) “Two Modelings for Theory Change”
Kim Sterelny and Philip Kitcher (1988) “The Return of the Gene”
Shelley Kagan (1988) “The Additive Fallacy”
William P. Alston (1988) “An Internalist Externalism”
David Lewis (1988) “Desire as Belief”
Frank Jackson and Philip Pettit (1988) “Functionalism and Broad Content”
John Rawls (1988) “The Priority of Right and Ideas of the Good”
G. A. Cohen (1989) “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice”
Ruth Garrett Millikan (1989b) “In Defense of Proper Functions”
Ruth Garrett Millikan (1989a) “Biosemantics”
Paul A. Boghossian and J. David Velleman (1989) “Color as a Secondary Quality”
Richard J. Arneson (1989) “Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare”
Paul A. Boghossian (1989) “The Rule-Following Considerations”
Mark Crimmins and John Perry (1989) “The Prince and the Phone Booth: Reporting Puzzling Beliefs”
Don Marquis (1989) “Why Abortion is Immoral”
Warren S. Quinn (1989) “Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Double Effect”
Philip Kitcher (1990) “The Division of Cognitive Labor”
Frank Jackson and Philip Pettit (1990) “Program Explanation: A General Perspective”
Donald Davidson (1990) “The Structure and Content of Truth”
Gideon Rosen (1990) “Modal Fictionalism”
Tim Crane and D. H. Mellor (1990) “There is No Question of Physicalism”
Jamie Dreier (1990) “Internalism and Speaker Relativism”
Jonathan Vogel (1990) “Cartesian Skepticism and Inference To the Best Explanation”
Jaegwon Kim (1990) “Supervenience as a Philosophical Concept”
Graeme Forbes (1990) “The Indispensability of Sinn”
Daniel C. Dennett (1991) “Real Patterns”
Karen Neander (1991) “Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst’s Defense”
Richard Boyd (1991) “Realism, Anti-foundationalism and the Enthusiasm for Natural Kinds”
Frank Jackson (1991) “Decision-theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest Objection”
Judith Jarvis Thomson (1991) “Self-Defense”
Jeroen Groenendijk and Martin Stokhof (1991) “Dynamic Predicate Logic”
John Hardwig (1991) “The Role of Trust in Knowledge”
Stephen Schiffer (1991) “Ceteris Paribus Laws”
Jerry A. Fodor (1991) “A Modal Argument for Narrow Content”
Stephen Yablo (1992) “Mental Causation”
Mark Johnston (1992) “How To Speak of the Colors”
Keith DeRose (1992) “Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions”
Jaegwon Kim (1992) “Multiple Realization and the Metaphysics of Reduction”
Michael E. Bratman (1992) “Shared Cooperative Activity”
Philip Kitcher (1992) “The Naturalists Return”
Richard Foley (1992) “The Epistemology of Belief and the Epistemology of Degrees of Belief”
Stephen Schiffer (1992) “Belief Ascription”
Michael B. Burke (1992) “Copper Statues and Pieces of Copper: A Challenge To the Standard Account”
Tyler Burge (1993) “Content Preservation”
Stephen Yablo (1993a) “Is Conceivability a Guide To Possibility”
Rae Langton (1993) “Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts”
Stephen Yablo (1993b) “Paradox Without Self-Reference”
Michael E. Bratman (1993) “Shared Intention”
Terrence Horgan (1993) “From Supervenience To Superdupervenience: Meeting the Demands of a Material World”
David Braun (1993) “Empty Names”
Paul E. Griffiths (1993) “Functional Analysis and Proper Functions”
Fred Dretske (1993) “Conscious Experience”
David Lewis (1994) “Humean Supervenience Debugged”
C. B. Martin (1994) “Dispositions and Conditionals”
Malcom Forster and Elliot Sober (1994) “How To Tell When Simpler, More Unified, or Less Ad Hoc Theories Will Provide More Accurate Predictions”
Hartry Field (1994) “Deflationist Views of Meaning and Content”
Peter Godfrey-Smith (1994) “A Modern History Theory of Functions”
Richard Holton (1994) “Deciding To Trust, Coming To Believe”
Robert Audi (1994) “Dispositional Beliefs and Dispositions To Believe”
Galen Strawson (1994) “The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility”
Paul E. Griffiths and R. D. Gray (1994) “Developmental Systems and Evolutionary Explanation”
Keith DeRose (1995) “Solving the Skeptical Problem”
Dorothy Edgington (1995) “On Conditionals”
Tim van Gelder (1995) “What Might Cognition Be, If Not Computation”
David Widerker (1995) “Libertarianism and Frankfurt’s Attack on the Principle of Alternative Possibilities”
Dean W. Zimmerman (1995) “Theories of Masses and Problems of Constitution”
Noam Chomsky (1995) “Language and Nature”
Karen Neander (1995) “Misrepresenting and Malfunctioning”
John McDowell (1995) “Knowledge and the Internal”
Kit Fine (1995) “The Logic of Essence”
David Lewis (1996) “Elusive Knowledge”
Timothy Williamson (1996) “Knowing and Asserting”
Frank Veltman (1996) “Defaults in Update Semantics”
Karen Jones (1996) “Trust as An Affective Attitude”
Ronald Dworkin (1996) “Objectivity and Truth: You’d Better Believe It”
Paul A. Boghossian (1996) “Analyticity Reconsidered”
Theodore Sider (1996) “All the World’s a Stage”
Alex Oliver (1996) “The Metaphysics of Properties”
Donald Davidson (1996) “The Folly of Trying To Define Truth”
David Lewis (1997) “Finkish Dispositions”
Derek Parfit (1997) “Equality and Priority”
Lynne Rudder Baker (1997) “Why Constitution is Not Identity”
Robert Audi (1997) “The Place of Testimony in the Fabric of Knowledge and Justification”
Christopher S. Hill (1997) “Imaginability, Conceivability, Possibility and the Mind-Body Problem”
Tyler Burge (1997) “Interlocution, Perception, and Memory”
R. M. Sainsbury (1997) “Easy Possibilities”
Susan Wolf (1997) “Happiness and Meaning: Two Aspects of the Good Life”
Michael J. Zimmerman (1997) “Moral Responsibility and Ignorance”
Andy Clark and David J. Chalmers (1998) “The Extended Mind”
James M. Joyce (1998) “A Nonpragmatic Vindication of Probabilism”
James Ladyman (1998) “What is Structural Realism?”
Nathan Salmon (1998) “Nonexistence”
Alexander Bird (1998) “Dispositions and Antidotes”
Rae Langton and David Lewis (1998) “Defining ‘Intrinsic’”
Earl Conee and Richard Feldman (1998) “The Generality Problem for Reliabilism”
Judith Jarvis Thomson (1998) “The Statue and the Clay”
John McDowell (1998) “Having the World in View: Sellars, Kant, and Intentionality: Lecture I: Sellars on Perceptual Experience”
Elizabeth S. Anderson (1999) “What is the Point of Equality?”
John Broome (1999) “Normative Requirements”
Ned Block and Robert C. Stalnaker (1999) “Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap”
Jaegwon Kim (1999) “Making Sense of Emergence”
William Bechtal and Jennifer Mundale (1999) “Multiple Realizability Revisited: Linking Cognitive and Neural States”
J. David Velleman (1999) “Love as a Moral Emotion”
Brandon Fitelson (1999) “The Plurality of Bayesian Measures of Confirmation and the Problem of Measure Sensitivity”
Tomoji Shogenji (1999) “Is Coherence Truth Conducive?”
John Hyman (1999) “How Knowledge Works”
Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden, and Carl F. Craver (2000) “Thinking About Mechanisms”
James Pryor (2000) “The Skeptic and the Dogmatist”
Sally Haslanger (2000) “Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them To Be?”
David Lewis (2000) “Causation as Influence”
Justin D’Arms and Dan Jacobson (2000) “The Moralistic Fallacy: On the ‘Appropriateness’ of Emotions”
Jason Stanley and Zoltán Gendler Szabó (2000) “On Quantifier Domain Restriction”
Heather Douglas (2000) “Inductive Risk and Values in Science”
Jason Stanley (2000) “Context and Logical Form”
Adam Elga (2000) “Self-Locating Belief and the ‘Sleeping Beauty’ Problem”
Jason Stanley and Timothy Williamson (2001) “Knowing How”
Alex Byrne (2001) “Intentionalism Defended”
David J. Chalmers and Frank Jackson (2001) “Conceptual Analysis and Reductive Explanation”
Alvin I. Goldman (2001) “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?”
Christopher Hitchcock (2001) “The Intransitivity of Causation Revealed in Equations and Graphs”
Patrick Rysiew (2001) “The Context-Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions”
Fred Adams and Ken Aizawa (2001) “The Bounds of Cognition”
Christopher Peacocke (2001) “Does Perception Have a Nonconceptual Content?”
Carl F. Craver (2001) “Role Functions, Mechanisms, and Hierarchy”
Michael G. F. Martin (2002) “The Transparency of Experience”
Jeremy Fantl and Matthew McGrath (2002) “Evidence, Pragmatics, and Justification”
Robert C. Stalnaker (2002) “Common Ground”
Stuart Glennan (2002) “Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation”
Stewart Cohen (2002) “Basic Knowledge and the Problem of Easy Knowledge”
Ruth Chang (2002) “The Possibility of Parity”
Crispin Wright (2002) “(Anti-)Sceptics Simple and Subtle: G.E. Moore and John McDowell”
Mohan Matthen and André Ariew (2002) “Two Ways of Thinking About Fitness and Natural Selection”
Christian List and Philip Pettit (2002) “Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result”
Keith DeRose (2003) “Assertion, Knowledge, and Context”
Nishi Shah (2003) “How Truth Governs Belief”
Joshua Knobe (2003) “Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language”
Alan Hájek (2003) “What Conditional Probability Could Not Be”
Tyler Burge (2003) “Perceptual Entitlement”
Thomas Kelly (2003) “Epistemic Rationality as Instrumental Rationality: A Critique”
Jonathan Schaffer (2003) “Is There a Fundamental Level?”
John MacFarlane (2003) “Future Contingents and Relative Truth”
Kit Fine (2003) “The Non-Identity of a Material Thing and Its Matter”
Wlodek Rabinowicz and Toni Rønnow‐Rasmussen (2004) “The Strike of the Demon: On Fitting Pro-Attitudes and Value”
Charles Travis (2004) “The Silence of the Senses”
Michael G. F. Martin (2004) “The Limits of Self-Awareness”
David Pitt (2004) “The Phenomenology of Cognition, Or, What is It Like To Think That P?”
Robert D. Rupert (2004) “Challenges To the Hypothesis of Extended Cognition”
Mark Johnston (2004) “The Obscure Object of Hallucination”
Ronald N. Giere (2004) “How Models Are Used To Represent Reality”
David J. Chalmers (2004) “Epistemic Two-Dimensional Semantics”
Jeff McMahan (2004) “The Ethics of Killing in War”
Niko Kolodny (2005) “Why Be Rational?”
Nishi Shah and J. David Velleman (2005) “Doxastic Deliberation”
Angela M. Smith (2005) “Responsibility for Attitudes: Activity and Passivity in Mental Life”
Peter Lasersohn (2005) “Context Dependence, Disagreement, and Predicates of Personal Taste”
Pamela Hieronymi (2005) “The Wrong Kind of Reason”
Matthew Weiner (2005) “Must We Know What We Say?”
Alan Baker (2005) “Are There Genuine Mathematical Explanations of Physical Phenomena?”
Timothy Williamson (2005) “Contextualism, Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and Knowledge of Knowledge”
Eddy Nahmias, Stephen Morris, Thomas Nadelhoffer, and Jason Turner (2005) “Surveying Freedom: Folk Intuitions About Free Will and Moral Responsibility”
Sharon Street (2006) “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value”
Hilary Greaves and David Wallace (2006) “Justifying Conditionalization: Conditionalization Maximizes Expected Epistemic Utility”
Igor Douven (2006) “Assertion, Knowledge, and Rational Credibility”
Carl F. Craver (2006) “When Mechanistic Models Explain”
Peter Godfrey-Smith (2006) “The Strategy of Model-Based Science”
Roger White (2006) “Problems for Dogmatism”
David Enoch (2006) “Agency, Shmagency: Why Normativity Won’t Come From What is Constitutive of Action”
Nishi Shah (2006) “A New Argument for Evidentialism”
Joshua Knobe (2006) “The Concept of Intentional Action: A Case Study in the Uses of Folk Psychology”
Adam Elga (2007) “Reflection and Disagreement”
David Christensen (2007) “Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News”
Seth Yalcin (2007) “Epistemic Modals”
Jennifer Lackey (2007) “Norms of Assertion”
Michael Huemer (2007) “Compassionate Phenomenal Conservatism”
Michael Weisberg (2007) “Three Kinds of Idealization”
Andy Egan (2007) “Epistemic Modals, Relativism and Assertion”
John MacFarlane (2007) “Relativism and Disagreement”
Shaun Nichols and Joshua Knobe (2007) “Moral Responsibility and Determinism: The Cognitive Science of Folk Intuitions”
John Hawthorne and Jason Stanley (2008) “Knowledge and Action”
Tamar Szabò Gendler (2008) “Alief and Belief”
Eric Schwitzgebel (2008) “The Unreliability of Naive Introspection”
Stacey Swain, Joshua Alexander, and Jonathan M. Weinberg (2008) “The Instability of Philosophical Intuitions: Running Hot and Cold on Truetemp”
Scott Sturgeon (2008) “Reason and the Grain of Belief”
Jessica Brown (2008) “Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and the Knowledge Norm for Practical Reasoning”
Michael Fara (2008) “Masked Abilities and Compatibilism”
Pamela Hieronymi (2008) “Responsibility for Believing”
David Manley and Ryan Wasserman (2008) “On Linking Dispositions and Conditionals”
Alison Hills (2009) “Moral Testimony and Moral Epistemology”
John MacFarlane (2009) “Nonindexical Contextualism”
Alan Baker (2009) “Mathematical Explanation in Science”
Alex Byrne (2009) “Experience and Content”
Jonathan Schaffer (2009) “Spacetime the One Substance”
Jonathan Cohen and Craig Callender (2009) “A Better Best System Account of Lawhood”
Mark Schroeder (2009) “Means-End Coherence, Stringency, and Subjective Reasons”
Tim Bayne (2009) “Perception and the Reach of Phenomenal Content”
Jonathan Quong (2009) “Killing in Self-Defense”
Jonathan Schaffer (2010a) “Monism: The Priority of the Whole”
David Christensen (2010) “Higher-Order Evidence”
Niko Kolodny and John MacFarlane (2010) “Ifs and Oughts”
James Woodward (2010) “Causation in Biology: Stability, Specificity, and the Choice of Levels of Explanation”
Eric Schwitzgebel (2010) “Acting Contrary To Our Professed Beliefs or the Gulf Between Occurrent Judgment and Dispositional Belief”
Kevin J. S. Zollman (2010) “The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity”
Julia Markovits (2010) “Acting for the Right Reasons”
Jonathan Schaffer (2010b) “The Least Discerning and Most Promiscuous Truthmaker”
Jonathan M. Weinberg, Chad Gonnerman, Cameron Buckner, and Joshua Alexander (2010) “Are Philosophers Expert Intuiters?”
Kristie Dotson (2011) “Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing”
David J. Chalmers (2011) “Verbal Disputes”
Karen Bennett (2011) “By Our Bootstraps”
David Michael Kaplan and Carl F. Craver (2011) “The Explanatory Force of Dynamical and Mathematical Models in Neuroscience: A Mechanistic Perspective”
C. S. Jenkins (2011) “Is Metaphysical Dependence Irreflexive?”
David Christensen (2011) “Disagreement, Question-Begging and Epistemic Self-Criticism”
Gualtiero Piccinini and Carl Craver (2011) “Integrating Psychology and Neuroscience: Functional Analyses as Mechanism Sketches”
Timothy Sundell (2011) “Disagreements About Taste”
Timothy Williamson (2011) “Philosophical Expertise and the Burden of Proof”
Duncan Pritchard (2012) “Anti-Luck Virtue Epistemology”
Paul Audi (2012) “Grounding: Toward a Theory of the In-Virtue-Of Relation”
Gaile Pohlhaus Jr. (2012) “Relational Knowing and Epistemic Injustice: Toward a Theory of Willful Hermeneutical Ignorance”
Fiona Macpherson (2012) “Cognitive Penetration of Colour Experience: Rethinking the Issue in Light of An Indirect Mechanism”
Pablo Cobreros, Paul Egre, David Ripley, and Robert Van Rooij (2012) “Tolerant, Classical, Strict”
Eric Schwitzgebel and Fiery Cushman (2012) “Expertise in Moral Reasoning? Order Effects on Moral Judgment in Professional Philosophers and Non-Philosophers”
Barry Loewer (2012) “Two Accounts of Laws and Time”
Susanna Siegel (2012) “Cognitive Penetrability and Perceptual Justification”
Elizabeth S. Anderson (2012) “Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions”
David Plunkett and Tim Sundell (2013) “Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms”
Jane Friedman (2013) “Suspended Judgment”
Louis deRosset (2013) “Grounding Explanations”
Kelly Trogdon (2013) “Grounding: Necessary or Contingent?”
David Ripley (2013) “Paradoxes and Failures of Cut”
Marc Lange (2013) “What Makes a Scientific Explanation Distinctively Mathematical?”
Selim Berker (2013) “Epistemic Teleology and the Separateness of Propositions”
Pablo Cobreros, Paul Egre, David Ripley, and Robert Van Rooij (2013) “Reaching Transparent Truth”
Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva (2013) “After-Birth Abortion: Why Should the Baby Live?”
Jessica M. Wilson (2014) “No Work for a Theory of Grounding”
Miriam Schoenfield (2014) “Permission To Believe: Why Permissivism is True and What It Tells Us About Irrelevant Influences on Belief”
Shamik Dasgupta (2014) “The Possibility of Physicalism”
Jacob Ross and Mark Schroeder (2014) “Belief, Credence, and Pragmatic Encroachment”
Paul A. Boghossian (2014) “What is Inference?”
Sophie Horowitz (2014) “Epistemic Akrasia”
Lara Buchak (2014) “Belief, Credence, and Norms”
Robert W. Batterman and Collin C. Rice (2014) “Minimal Model Explanations”
Stephan Leuenberger (2014) “Grounding and Necessity”
Alexander Skiles (2015) “Against Grounding Necessitarianism”
Michael J. Raven (2015) “Ground”
Collin Rice (2015) “Moving Beyond Causes: Optimality Models and Scientific Explanation”
David Plunkett (2015) “Which Concepts Should We Use?: Metalinguistic Negotiations and the Methodology of Philosophy”
James Woodward (2015) “Interventionism and Causal Exclusion”
Kit Fine (2015) “Unified Foundations for Essence and Ground”
John Bengson (2015) “The Intellectual Given”
Jonathan Schaffer (2015) “What Not To Multiply Without Necessity”
Neil Levy (2015) “Neither Fish Nor Fowl: Implicit Attitudes as Patchy Endorsements”
Jonathan Schaffer (2016) “Grounding in the Image of Causation”
Cian Dorr (2016) “To Be F is To Be G”
Alison Hills (2016) “Understanding Why”
Eric Mandelbaum (2016) “Attitude, Inference, Association: On the Propositional Structure of Implicit Bias”
Shamik Dasgupta (2016) “Metaphysical Rationalism”
Conor McHugh and Jonathan Way (2016) “Fittingness First”
Miranda Fricker (2016) “What’s the Point of Blame? a Paradigm Based Explanation”
John Hawthorne, Daniel Rothschild, and Levi Spectre (2016) “Belief is Weak”
Jakob Hohwy (2016) “The Self-Evidencing Brain”
Jane Friedman (2017) “Why Suspend Judging?”
Jonathan Schaffer (2017) “The Ground Between the Gaps”
Susanna Rinard (2017) “No Exception for Belief”
Dennis Whitcomb, Heather Battaly, Jason Baehr, and Daniel Howard-Snyder (2017) “Intellectual Humility: Owning Our Limitations”
Ole Thomassen Hjortland (2017) “Anti-Exceptionalism About Logic”
Kit Fine (2017) “A Theory of Truthmaker Content I: Conjunction, Disjunction and Negation”
Jason Stanley and Timothy Williamson (2017) “Skill”
David J. Chalmers (2018) “The Meta-Problem of Consciousness”
Alastair Wilson (2018) “Metaphysical Causation”
Alex Worsnip (2018) “The Conflict of Evidence and Coherence”
Amia Srinivasan (2018) “The Aptness of Anger”
Michael Prinzing (2018) “The Revisionist’s Rubric: Conceptual Engineering and the Discontinuity Objection”
Selim Berker (2018) “The Unity of Grounding”
Jelle Bruineberg, Julian Kiverstein, and Erik Rietveld (2018) “The Anticipating Brain is Not a Scientist: The Free-Energy Principle From An Ecological-Enactive Perspective”
Jane Friedman (2019) “Inquiry and Belief”
Rima Basu (2019a) “The Wrongs of Racist Beliefs”
Fabrice Correia and Alexander Skiles (2019) “Grounding, Essence, and Identity”
Rima Basu (2019b) “What We Epistemically Owe To Each Other”
Kevin Dorst (2019) “Lockeans Maximize Expected Accuracy”
C. Thi Nguyen (2020) “Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles”
Renee Jorgensen Bolinger (2020) “The Rational Impermissibility of Accepting (Some) Racial Generalizations”

3 Yearly Data

3.1 1956

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Willard van Orman Quine (1956) “Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes”
  2. Gottlob Frege (1956) “The Thought: A Logical Inquiry”
  3. H. P. Grice and P. F. Strawson (1956) “In Defense of a Dogma”
  4. John G. Kemeny and Paul Oppenheim (1956) “On Reduction”

Citation Count

Table 4: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1956.
Article All Early Late
Quine (1956) 148 1 79
Frege (1956) 144 1 92
Grice and Strawson (1956) 66 1 19
Kemeny and Oppenheim (1956) 39 0 11

Citation Rank

Table 5: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1956.
Article Overall Early Late
Quine (1956) 1 13 2
Frege (1956) 2 13 1
Grice and Strawson (1956) 3 13 3
Kemeny and Oppenheim (1956) 4 54 4

3.2 1957

Widely Cited Articles

  1. H. P. Grice (1957) “Meaning”
  2. Zeno Vendler (1957) “Verbs and Times”

Citation Count

Table 6: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1957.
Article All Early Late
Grice (1957) 346 0 176
Vendler (1957) 66 0 49

Citation Rank

Table 7: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1957.
Article Overall Early Late
Grice (1957) 1 70 1
Vendler (1957) 2 70 2

3.3 1958

Widely Cited Articles

  1. G. E. M. Anscombe (1958) “Modern Moral Philosophy”
  2. John R. Searle (1958) “Proper Names”
  3. John Rawls (1958) “Justice as Fairness”
  4. Stuart Hampshire and H. L. A. Hart (1958) “Decision, Intention and Certainty”

Citation Count

Table 8: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1958.
Article All Early Late
Anscombe (1958) 206 3 116
Searle (1958) 88 2 27
Rawls (1958) 56 7 14
Hampshire and Hart (1958) 34 3 15

Citation Rank

Table 9: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1958.
Article Overall Early Late
Anscombe (1958) 1 5 1
Searle (1958) 2 13 2
Rawls (1958) 3 2 5
Hampshire and Hart (1958) 4 5 4

3.4 1959

Widely Cited Articles

  1. J. J. C. Smart (1959) “Sensations and Brain Processes”
  2. Frank Sibley (1959) “Aesthetic Concepts”
  3. A. N. Prior (1959) “Thank Goodness That”s Over”
  4. Karl R. Popper (1959) “The Propensity Interpretation of Probability”
  5. Michael Dummett (1959) “Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Mathematics”

Citation Count

Table 10: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1959.
Article All Early Late
Smart (1959) 188 9 87
Sibley (1959) 93 2 56
A. N. Prior (1959) 90 0 63
Popper (1959) 66 2 18
Dummett (1959) 41 4 20

Citation Rank

Table 11: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1959.
Article Overall Early Late
Smart (1959) 1 1 1
Sibley (1959) 2 11 3
A. N. Prior (1959) 3 76 2
Popper (1959) 4 11 5
Dummett (1959) 5 4 4

3.5 1960

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Peter T. Geach (1960) “Ascriptivism”
  2. Norman Malcolm (1960) “Anselm’s Ontological Arguments”

Citation Count

Table 12: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1960.
Article All Early Late
Geach (1960) 70 3 29
Malcolm (1960) 65 14 18

Citation Rank

Table 13: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1960.
Article Overall Early Late
Geach (1960) 1 5 1
Malcolm (1960) 2 1 3

3.6 1961

Widely Cited Articles

  1. J. J. C. Smart (1961) “Free-Will, Praise and Blame”
  2. J. R. Lucas (1961) “Minds, Machines and Gödel”
  3. I. J. Good (1961) “A Causal Calculus (I)”

Citation Count

Table 14: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1961.
Article All Early Late
Smart (1961) 70 3 40
Lucas (1961) 64 9 17
Good (1961) 46 0 16

Citation Rank

Table 15: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1961.
Article Overall Early Late
Smart (1961) 1 6 1
Lucas (1961) 2 1 2
Good (1961) 3 96 4

3.7 1962

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Hilary Putnam (1962) “It Ain’t Necessarily So”
  2. E. J. Lemmon (1962) “Moral Dilemmas”
  3. John R. Searle (1962) “Meaning and Speech Acts”
  4. Jaako Hintikka (1962) “Cogito, Ergo Sum: Inference or Performance?”

Citation Count

Table 16: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1962.
Article All Early Late
Putnam (1962) 42 5 22
Lemmon (1962) 41 1 13
Searle (1962) 38 2 13
Hintikka (1962) 36 3 11

Citation Rank

Table 17: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1962.
Article Overall Early Late
Putnam (1962) 1 4 1
Lemmon (1962) 2 28 2
Searle (1962) 3 14 2
Hintikka (1962) 4 6 6

3.8 1964

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Arthur Danto (1964) “The Artworld”
  2. P. F. Strawson (1964) “Intention and Convention in Speech Acts”
  3. John R. Searle (1964) “How To Derive Ought From Is”
  4. Michael Dummett (1964) “Bringing About the Past”
  5. George Dickie (1964) “The Myth of the Aesthetic Attitude”

Citation Count

Table 18: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1964.
Article All Early Late
Danto (1964) 90 2 35
P. F. Strawson (1964) 89 3 49
Searle (1964) 71 10 28
Dummett (1964) 49 1 20
Dickie (1964) 48 2 21

Citation Rank

Table 19: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1964.
Article Overall Early Late
Danto (1964) 1 24 2
P. F. Strawson (1964) 2 12 1
Searle (1964) 3 1 3
Dummett (1964) 4 45 5
Dickie (1964) 5 24 4

3.9 1965

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Paul Benacerraf (1965) “What Numbers Could Not Be”
  2. Gilbert Harman (1965) “The Inference To the Best Explanation”
  3. Peter T. Geach (1965) “Assertion”
  4. J. L. Mackie (1965) “Causes and Conditions”
  5. Richard Rorty (1965) “Mind-Body Identity, Privacy, and Categories”
  6. David L. Hull (1965) “The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy: 2000 Years of Stasis (I)”
  7. Frank Sibley (1965) “Aesthetic and Non-Aesthetic”
  8. Joel Feinberg (1965) “The Expressive Function of Punishment”

Citation Count

Table 20: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1965.
Article All Early Late
Benacerraf (1965) 239 5 118
Harman (1965) 199 10 87
Geach (1965) 167 2 75
Mackie (1965) 119 9 56
Rorty (1965) 65 21 13
Hull (1965) 57 0 19
Sibley (1965) 48 1 31
Feinberg (1965) 47 2 36

Citation Rank

Table 21: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1965.
Article Overall Early Late
Benacerraf (1965) 1 7 1
Harman (1965) 2 2 2
Geach (1965) 3 28 3
Mackie (1965) 4 3 4
Rorty (1965) 5 1 11
Hull (1965) 6 140 9
Sibley (1965) 8 54 6
Feinberg (1965) 10 28 5

3.10 1966

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Keith S. Donnellan (1966) “Reference and Definite Descriptions”
  2. David Lewis (1966) “An Argument for the Identity Theory”
  3. C. B. Martin and Max Deutscher (1966) “Remembering”
  4. Bas C. van Fraassen (1966) “Singular Terms, Truth-Value Gaps, and Free Logic”
  5. Jaegwon Kim (1966) “On the Psycho-Physical Identity Theory”
  6. Roderick M. Chisholm and Ernest Sosa (1966) “Logic of Intrinsically Better”

Citation Count

Table 22: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1966.
Article All Early Late
Donnellan (1966) 367 21 121
Lewis (1966) 146 2 64
C. B. Martin and Deutscher (1966) 88 3 55
van Fraassen (1966) 76 8 29
Kim (1966) 43 6 9
Chisholm and Sosa (1966) 34 9 13

Citation Rank

Table 23: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1966.
Article Overall Early Late
Donnellan (1966) 1 1 1
Lewis (1966) 2 32 2
C. B. Martin and Deutscher (1966) 3 15 3
van Fraassen (1966) 4 3 4
Kim (1966) 5 4 9
Chisholm and Sosa (1966) 6 2 7

3.11 1967

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Donald Davidson (1967b) “Truth and Meaning”
  2. Alvin I. Goldman (1967) “A Causal Theory of Knowing”
  3. Donald Davidson (1967a) “Causal Relations”
  4. Hector-Neri Castañeda (1967) “Indicators and Quasi-Indicators”
  5. Kenneth F. Schaffner (1967) “Approaches To Reduction”
  6. Hilary Putnam (1967) “Time and Physical Geometry”
  7. Ian Hacking (1967b) “Slightly More Realistic Personal Probability”
  8. Ian Hacking (1967a) “Possibility”

Citation Count

Table 24: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1967.
Article All Early Late
Davidson (1967b) 166 16 54
Goldman (1967) 164 16 80
Davidson (1967a) 134 17 45
Castañeda (1967) 104 12 20
Schaffner (1967) 103 6 22
Putnam (1967) 91 4 47
Hacking (1967b) 69 4 29
Hacking (1967a) 63 3 36

Citation Rank

Table 25: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1967.
Article Overall Early Late
Davidson (1967b) 1 2 2
Goldman (1967) 2 2 1
Davidson (1967a) 3 1 4
Castañeda (1967) 4 4 12
Schaffner (1967) 5 9 10
Putnam (1967) 6 16 3
Hacking (1967b) 7 16 6
Hacking (1967a) 8 28 5

3.12 1968

Widely Cited Articles

  1. David Lewis (1968) “Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic”
  2. Sydney Shoemaker (1968) “Self-Reference and Self-Awareness”
  3. Barry Stroud (1968) “Transcendental Arguments”
  4. Peter Unger (1968) “An Analysis of Factual Knowledge”
  5. Herbert Morris (1968) “Persons and Punishment”
  6. Willard van Orman Quine (1968) “Ontological Relativity”
  7. Bas C. van Fraassen (1968) “Presupposition, Implication, and Self-Reference”
  8. Gilbert Harman (1968) “Knowledge, Inference, and Explanation”

Citation Count

Table 26: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1968.
Article All Early Late
Lewis (1968) 224 8 99
Shoemaker (1968) 118 1 76
Stroud (1968) 102 9 40
Unger (1968) 90 10 49
Morris (1968) 85 3 26
Quine (1968) 56 4 33
van Fraassen (1968) 53 16 10
Harman (1968) 45 12 14

Citation Rank

Table 27: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1968.
Article Overall Early Late
Lewis (1968) 1 6 1
Shoemaker (1968) 2 63 2
Stroud (1968) 3 4 4
Unger (1968) 4 3 3
Morris (1968) 5 22 7
Quine (1968) 7 15 5
van Fraassen (1968) 8 1 15
Harman (1968) 10 2 13

3.13 1969

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Harry G. Frankfurt (1969) “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility”
  2. H. P. Grice (1969) “Utterer’s Meaning and Intentions”
  3. Keith Lehrer and Thomas Paxson Jr. (1969) “Knowledge: Undefeated Justified True Belief”
  4. Bas C. van Fraassen (1969) “Facts and Tautological Entailments”
  5. J. A. Goguen (1969) “The Logic of Inexact Concepts”

Citation Count

Table 28: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1969.
Article All Early Late
Frankfurt (1969) 513 4 279
Grice (1969) 113 10 40
Lehrer and Paxson (1969) 100 12 44
van Fraassen (1969) 54 4 32
Goguen (1969) 51 2 11

Citation Rank

Table 29: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1969.
Article Overall Early Late
Frankfurt (1969) 1 14 1
Grice (1969) 2 3 3
Lehrer and Paxson (1969) 3 2 2
van Fraassen (1969) 4 14 4
Goguen (1969) 5 46 10

3.14 1970

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Fred Dretske (1970) “Epistemic Operators”
  2. David Lewis (1970) “How To Define Theoretical Terms”
  3. Kendall L. Walton (1970) “Categories of Art”
  4. Robert C. Stalnaker (1970) “Probability and Conditionals”
  5. Sydney Shoemaker (1970) “Persons and Their Pasts”
  6. Willard van Orman Quine (1970) “On the Reasons for Indeterminacy of Translation”
  7. Bas C. van Fraassen (1970) “On Extension of Beths Semantics of Physical Theories”
  8. Richard Rorty (1970) “Incorrigibility as Mark of Mental”

Citation Count

Table 30: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1970.
Article All Early Late
Dretske (1970) 337 3 162
Lewis (1970) 241 5 114
Walton (1970) 174 4 97
Stalnaker (1970) 96 6 48
Shoemaker (1970) 95 3 47
Quine (1970) 68 16 13
van Fraassen (1970) 52 8 17
Rorty (1970) 35 11 5

Citation Rank

Table 31: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1970.
Article Overall Early Late
Dretske (1970) 1 38 1
Lewis (1970) 2 17 2
Walton (1970) 3 26 3
Stalnaker (1970) 4 11 4
Shoemaker (1970) 5 38 5
Quine (1970) 7 1 13
van Fraassen (1970) 9 5 10
Rorty (1970) 14 2 25

3.15 1971

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Harry G. Frankfurt (1971) “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person”
  2. Harry G. Frankfurt (1971) “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person”
  3. Harry G. Frankfurt (1971) “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person”
  4. Harry G. Frankfurt (1971) “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person”
  5. Harry G. Frankfurt (1971) “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person”
  6. Harry G. Frankfurt (1971) “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person”
  7. Daniel C. Dennett (1971) “Intentional Systems”
  8. Daniel C. Dennett (1971) “Intentional Systems”
  9. Daniel C. Dennett (1971) “Intentional Systems”
  10. Daniel C. Dennett (1971) “Intentional Systems”
  11. Daniel C. Dennett (1971) “Intentional Systems”
  12. Daniel C. Dennett (1971) “Intentional Systems”
  13. David Lewis (1971) “Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies”
  14. David Lewis (1971) “Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies”
  15. David Lewis (1971) “Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies”
  16. David Lewis (1971) “Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies”
  17. David Lewis (1971) “Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies”
  18. David Lewis (1971) “Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies”
  19. George Boolos (1971) “The Iterative Conception of Set”
  20. George Boolos (1971) “The Iterative Conception of Set”
  21. George Boolos (1971) “The Iterative Conception of Set”
  22. George Boolos (1971) “The Iterative Conception of Set”
  23. George Boolos (1971) “The Iterative Conception of Set”
  24. George Boolos (1971) “The Iterative Conception of Set”
  25. Peter D. Klein (1971) “A Proposed Definition of Propositional Knowledge”
  26. Peter D. Klein (1971) “A Proposed Definition of Propositional Knowledge”
  27. Peter D. Klein (1971) “A Proposed Definition of Propositional Knowledge”
  28. Peter D. Klein (1971) “A Proposed Definition of Propositional Knowledge”
  29. Peter D. Klein (1971) “A Proposed Definition of Propositional Knowledge”
  30. Peter D. Klein (1971) “A Proposed Definition of Propositional Knowledge”
  31. Alvin I. Goldman (1971) “The Individuation of Action”
  32. Alvin I. Goldman (1971) “The Individuation of Action”
  33. Alvin I. Goldman (1971) “The Individuation of Action”
  34. Alvin I. Goldman (1971) “The Individuation of Action”
  35. Alvin I. Goldman (1971) “The Individuation of Action”
  36. Alvin I. Goldman (1971) “The Individuation of Action”
  37. Judith Jarvis Thomson (1971b) “The Time of a Killing”
  38. Judith Jarvis Thomson (1971b) “The Time of a Killing”
  39. Judith Jarvis Thomson (1971b) “The Time of a Killing”
  40. Judith Jarvis Thomson (1971b) “The Time of a Killing”
  41. Judith Jarvis Thomson (1971b) “The Time of a Killing”
  42. Judith Jarvis Thomson (1971b) “The Time of a Killing”
  43. Judith Jarvis Thomson (1971a) “A Defense of Abortion”
  44. Keith Lehrer (1971) “How Reasons Give Us Knowledge, or the Case of the Gypsy Lawyer”
  45. Keith Lehrer (1971) “How Reasons Give Us Knowledge, or the Case of the Gypsy Lawyer”
  46. Keith Lehrer (1971) “How Reasons Give Us Knowledge, or the Case of the Gypsy Lawyer”
  47. Keith Lehrer (1971) “How Reasons Give Us Knowledge, or the Case of the Gypsy Lawyer”
  48. Keith Lehrer (1971) “How Reasons Give Us Knowledge, or the Case of the Gypsy Lawyer”
  49. Keith Lehrer (1971) “How Reasons Give Us Knowledge, or the Case of the Gypsy Lawyer”

Citation Count

Table 32: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1971.
Article All Early Late
Frankfurt (1971) 3378 204 1482
Frankfurt (1971) 3378 204 1482
Frankfurt (1971) 3378 204 1482
Frankfurt (1971) 3378 204 1482
Frankfurt (1971) 3378 204 1482
Frankfurt (1971) 3378 204 1482
Dennett (1971) 756 108 246
Dennett (1971) 756 108 246
Dennett (1971) 756 108 246
Dennett (1971) 756 108 246
Dennett (1971) 756 108 246
Dennett (1971) 756 108 246
Lewis (1971) 672 54 288
Lewis (1971) 672 54 288
Lewis (1971) 672 54 288
Lewis (1971) 672 54 288
Lewis (1971) 672 54 288
Lewis (1971) 672 54 288
Boolos (1971) 546 24 288
Boolos (1971) 546 24 288
Boolos (1971) 546 24 288
Boolos (1971) 546 24 288
Boolos (1971) 546 24 288
Boolos (1971) 546 24 288
Klein (1971) 282 78 96
Klein (1971) 282 78 96
Klein (1971) 282 78 96
Klein (1971) 282 78 96
Klein (1971) 282 78 96
Klein (1971) 282 78 96
Goldman (1971) 264 102 54
Goldman (1971) 264 102 54
Goldman (1971) 264 102 54
Goldman (1971) 264 102 54
Goldman (1971) 264 102 54
Goldman (1971) 264 102 54
Thomson (1971b) 252 84 54
Thomson (1971b) 252 84 54
Thomson (1971b) 252 84 54
Thomson (1971b) 252 84 54
Thomson (1971b) 252 84 54
Thomson (1971b) 252 84 54
Thomson (1971a) 250 20 121
Lehrer (1971) 246 24 126
Lehrer (1971) 246 24 126
Lehrer (1971) 246 24 126
Lehrer (1971) 246 24 126
Lehrer (1971) 246 24 126
Lehrer (1971) 246 24 126

Citation Rank

Table 33: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1971.
Article Overall Early Late
Frankfurt (1971) 1 1 1
Frankfurt (1971) 1 1 1
Frankfurt (1971) 1 1 1
Frankfurt (1971) 1 1 1
Frankfurt (1971) 1 1 1
Frankfurt (1971) 1 1 1
Dennett (1971) 2 2 4
Dennett (1971) 2 2 4
Dennett (1971) 2 2 4
Dennett (1971) 2 2 4
Dennett (1971) 2 2 4
Dennett (1971) 2 2 4
Lewis (1971) 3 6 2
Lewis (1971) 3 6 2
Lewis (1971) 3 6 2
Lewis (1971) 3 6 2
Lewis (1971) 3 6 2
Lewis (1971) 3 6 2
Boolos (1971) 4 12 2
Boolos (1971) 4 12 2
Boolos (1971) 4 12 2
Boolos (1971) 4 12 2
Boolos (1971) 4 12 2
Boolos (1971) 4 12 2
Klein (1971) 5 5 8
Klein (1971) 5 5 8
Klein (1971) 5 5 8
Klein (1971) 5 5 8
Klein (1971) 5 5 8
Klein (1971) 5 5 8
Goldman (1971) 6 3 11
Goldman (1971) 6 3 11
Goldman (1971) 6 3 11
Goldman (1971) 6 3 11
Goldman (1971) 6 3 11
Goldman (1971) 6 3 11
Thomson (1971b) 7 4 11
Thomson (1971b) 7 4 11
Thomson (1971b) 7 4 11
Thomson (1971b) 7 4 11
Thomson (1971b) 7 4 11
Thomson (1971b) 7 4 11
Thomson (1971a) 8 19 6
Lehrer (1971) 9 12 5
Lehrer (1971) 9 12 5
Lehrer (1971) 9 12 5
Lehrer (1971) 9 12 5
Lehrer (1971) 9 12 5
Lehrer (1971) 9 12 5

3.16 1972

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Hartry Field (1972) “Tarski’s Theory of Truth”
  2. Hartry Field (1972) “Tarski’s Theory of Truth”
  3. Hartry Field (1972) “Tarski’s Theory of Truth”
  4. Hartry Field (1972) “Tarski’s Theory of Truth”
  5. Hartry Field (1972) “Tarski’s Theory of Truth”
  6. Hartry Field (1972) “Tarski’s Theory of Truth”
  7. Peter Singer (1972) “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”
  8. John Perry (1972) “Can the Self Divide?”
  9. John Perry (1972) “Can the Self Divide?”
  10. John Perry (1972) “Can the Self Divide?”
  11. John Perry (1972) “Can the Self Divide?”
  12. John Perry (1972) “Can the Self Divide?”
  13. John Perry (1972) “Can the Self Divide?”
  14. Richard Rorty (1972) “The World Well Lost”
  15. Richard Rorty (1972) “The World Well Lost”
  16. Richard Rorty (1972) “The World Well Lost”
  17. Richard Rorty (1972) “The World Well Lost”
  18. Richard Rorty (1972) “The World Well Lost”
  19. Richard Rorty (1972) “The World Well Lost”
  20. Thompson Clarke (1972) “The Legacy of Skepticism”
  21. Thompson Clarke (1972) “The Legacy of Skepticism”
  22. Thompson Clarke (1972) “The Legacy of Skepticism”
  23. Thompson Clarke (1972) “The Legacy of Skepticism”
  24. Thompson Clarke (1972) “The Legacy of Skepticism”
  25. Thompson Clarke (1972) “The Legacy of Skepticism”
  26. Robert L. Causey (1972) “Attribute-Identities in Microreductions”
  27. Robert L. Causey (1972) “Attribute-Identities in Microreductions”
  28. Robert L. Causey (1972) “Attribute-Identities in Microreductions”
  29. Robert L. Causey (1972) “Attribute-Identities in Microreductions”
  30. Robert L. Causey (1972) “Attribute-Identities in Microreductions”
  31. Robert L. Causey (1972) “Attribute-Identities in Microreductions”
  32. Philippa Foot (1972) “Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives”
  33. Richard Brandt (1972) “Rationality, Egoism, and Morality”
  34. Richard Brandt (1972) “Rationality, Egoism, and Morality”
  35. Richard Brandt (1972) “Rationality, Egoism, and Morality”
  36. Richard Brandt (1972) “Rationality, Egoism, and Morality”
  37. Richard Brandt (1972) “Rationality, Egoism, and Morality”
  38. Richard Brandt (1972) “Rationality, Egoism, and Morality”
  39. Marshall Swain (1972) “Knowledge, Causality, and Justification”
  40. Marshall Swain (1972) “Knowledge, Causality, and Justification”
  41. Marshall Swain (1972) “Knowledge, Causality, and Justification”
  42. Marshall Swain (1972) “Knowledge, Causality, and Justification”
  43. Marshall Swain (1972) “Knowledge, Causality, and Justification”
  44. Marshall Swain (1972) “Knowledge, Causality, and Justification”

Citation Count

Table 34: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1972.
Article All Early Late
Field (1972) 816 174 132
Field (1972) 816 174 132
Field (1972) 816 174 132
Field (1972) 816 174 132
Field (1972) 816 174 132
Field (1972) 816 174 132
Singer (1972) 394 5 277
Perry (1972) 378 72 78
Perry (1972) 378 72 78
Perry (1972) 378 72 78
Perry (1972) 378 72 78
Perry (1972) 378 72 78
Perry (1972) 378 72 78
Rorty (1972) 306 132 12
Rorty (1972) 306 132 12
Rorty (1972) 306 132 12
Rorty (1972) 306 132 12
Rorty (1972) 306 132 12
Rorty (1972) 306 132 12
Clarke (1972) 264 30 84
Clarke (1972) 264 30 84
Clarke (1972) 264 30 84
Clarke (1972) 264 30 84
Clarke (1972) 264 30 84
Clarke (1972) 264 30 84
Causey (1972) 192 108 24
Causey (1972) 192 108 24
Causey (1972) 192 108 24
Causey (1972) 192 108 24
Causey (1972) 192 108 24
Causey (1972) 192 108 24
Foot (1972) 131 15 77
Brandt (1972) 114 60 0
Brandt (1972) 114 60 0
Brandt (1972) 114 60 0
Brandt (1972) 114 60 0
Brandt (1972) 114 60 0
Brandt (1972) 114 60 0
M. Swain (1972) 84 66 0
M. Swain (1972) 84 66 0
M. Swain (1972) 84 66 0
M. Swain (1972) 84 66 0
M. Swain (1972) 84 66 0
M. Swain (1972) 84 66 0

Citation Rank

Table 35: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1972.
Article Overall Early Late
Field (1972) 1 1 2
Field (1972) 1 1 2
Field (1972) 1 1 2
Field (1972) 1 1 2
Field (1972) 1 1 2
Field (1972) 1 1 2
Singer (1972) 2 49 1
Perry (1972) 3 4 4
Perry (1972) 3 4 4
Perry (1972) 3 4 4
Perry (1972) 3 4 4
Perry (1972) 3 4 4
Perry (1972) 3 4 4
Rorty (1972) 4 2 22
Rorty (1972) 4 2 22
Rorty (1972) 4 2 22
Rorty (1972) 4 2 22
Rorty (1972) 4 2 22
Rorty (1972) 4 2 22
Clarke (1972) 5 11 3
Clarke (1972) 5 11 3
Clarke (1972) 5 11 3
Clarke (1972) 5 11 3
Clarke (1972) 5 11 3
Clarke (1972) 5 11 3
Causey (1972) 6 3 7
Causey (1972) 6 3 7
Causey (1972) 6 3 7
Causey (1972) 6 3 7
Causey (1972) 6 3 7
Causey (1972) 6 3 7
Foot (1972) 8 17 5
Brandt (1972) 9 6 135
Brandt (1972) 9 6 135
Brandt (1972) 9 6 135
Brandt (1972) 9 6 135
Brandt (1972) 9 6 135
Brandt (1972) 9 6 135
M. Swain (1972) 11 5 135
M. Swain (1972) 11 5 135
M. Swain (1972) 11 5 135
M. Swain (1972) 11 5 135
M. Swain (1972) 11 5 135
M. Swain (1972) 11 5 135

3.17 1973

Widely Cited Articles

  1. David Lewis (1973) “Causation”
  2. David Lewis (1973) “Causation”
  3. David Lewis (1973) “Causation”
  4. David Lewis (1973) “Causation”
  5. David Lewis (1973) “Causation”
  6. David Lewis (1973) “Causation”
  7. Paul Benacerraf (1973) “Mathematical Truth”
  8. Paul Benacerraf (1973) “Mathematical Truth”
  9. Paul Benacerraf (1973) “Mathematical Truth”
  10. Paul Benacerraf (1973) “Mathematical Truth”
  11. Paul Benacerraf (1973) “Mathematical Truth”
  12. Paul Benacerraf (1973) “Mathematical Truth”
  13. Hilary Putnam (1973) “Meaning and Reference”
  14. Hilary Putnam (1973) “Meaning and Reference”
  15. Hilary Putnam (1973) “Meaning and Reference”
  16. Hilary Putnam (1973) “Meaning and Reference”
  17. Hilary Putnam (1973) “Meaning and Reference”
  18. Hilary Putnam (1973) “Meaning and Reference”
  19. Hartry Field (1973) “Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference”
  20. Hartry Field (1973) “Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference”
  21. Hartry Field (1973) “Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference”
  22. Hartry Field (1973) “Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference”
  23. Hartry Field (1973) “Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference”
  24. Hartry Field (1973) “Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference”
  25. Jaegwon Kim (1973) “Causation, Nomic Subsumption, and the Concept of Event”
  26. Jaegwon Kim (1973) “Causation, Nomic Subsumption, and the Concept of Event”
  27. Jaegwon Kim (1973) “Causation, Nomic Subsumption, and the Concept of Event”
  28. Jaegwon Kim (1973) “Causation, Nomic Subsumption, and the Concept of Event”
  29. Jaegwon Kim (1973) “Causation, Nomic Subsumption, and the Concept of Event”
  30. Jaegwon Kim (1973) “Causation, Nomic Subsumption, and the Concept of Event”
  31. Tyler Burge (1973) “Reference and Proper Names”
  32. Tyler Burge (1973) “Reference and Proper Names”
  33. Tyler Burge (1973) “Reference and Proper Names”
  34. Tyler Burge (1973) “Reference and Proper Names”
  35. Tyler Burge (1973) “Reference and Proper Names”
  36. Tyler Burge (1973) “Reference and Proper Names”
  37. Bas C. Van Fraassen (1973) “Values and the Heart’s Command”
  38. Bas C. Van Fraassen (1973) “Values and the Heart’s Command”
  39. Bas C. Van Fraassen (1973) “Values and the Heart’s Command”
  40. Bas C. Van Fraassen (1973) “Values and the Heart’s Command”
  41. Bas C. Van Fraassen (1973) “Values and the Heart’s Command”
  42. Bas C. Van Fraassen (1973) “Values and the Heart’s Command”
  43. Barbara Hall Partee (1973) “Some Structural Analogies Between Tenses and Pronouns in English”
  44. Barbara Hall Partee (1973) “Some Structural Analogies Between Tenses and Pronouns in English”
  45. Barbara Hall Partee (1973) “Some Structural Analogies Between Tenses and Pronouns in English”
  46. Barbara Hall Partee (1973) “Some Structural Analogies Between Tenses and Pronouns in English”
  47. Barbara Hall Partee (1973) “Some Structural Analogies Between Tenses and Pronouns in English”
  48. Barbara Hall Partee (1973) “Some Structural Analogies Between Tenses and Pronouns in English”
  49. Richard Grandy (1973) “Reference, Meaning, and Belief”
  50. Richard Grandy (1973) “Reference, Meaning, and Belief”
  51. Richard Grandy (1973) “Reference, Meaning, and Belief”
  52. Richard Grandy (1973) “Reference, Meaning, and Belief”
  53. Richard Grandy (1973) “Reference, Meaning, and Belief”
  54. Richard Grandy (1973) “Reference, Meaning, and Belief”

Citation Count

Table 36: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1973.
Article All Early Late
Lewis (1973) 2766 264 1404
Lewis (1973) 2766 264 1404
Lewis (1973) 2766 264 1404
Lewis (1973) 2766 264 1404
Lewis (1973) 2766 264 1404
Lewis (1973) 2766 264 1404
Benacerraf (1973) 1704 168 858
Benacerraf (1973) 1704 168 858
Benacerraf (1973) 1704 168 858
Benacerraf (1973) 1704 168 858
Benacerraf (1973) 1704 168 858
Benacerraf (1973) 1704 168 858
Putnam (1973) 1062 234 516
Putnam (1973) 1062 234 516
Putnam (1973) 1062 234 516
Putnam (1973) 1062 234 516
Putnam (1973) 1062 234 516
Putnam (1973) 1062 234 516
Field (1973) 846 126 216
Field (1973) 846 126 216
Field (1973) 846 126 216
Field (1973) 846 126 216
Field (1973) 846 126 216
Field (1973) 846 126 216
Kim (1973) 642 192 132
Kim (1973) 642 192 132
Kim (1973) 642 192 132
Kim (1973) 642 192 132
Kim (1973) 642 192 132
Kim (1973) 642 192 132
Burge (1973) 624 96 342
Burge (1973) 624 96 342
Burge (1973) 624 96 342
Burge (1973) 624 96 342
Burge (1973) 624 96 342
Burge (1973) 624 96 342
van Fraassen (1973) 504 96 168
van Fraassen (1973) 504 96 168
van Fraassen (1973) 504 96 168
van Fraassen (1973) 504 96 168
van Fraassen (1973) 504 96 168
van Fraassen (1973) 504 96 168
Partee (1973) 456 36 210
Partee (1973) 456 36 210
Partee (1973) 456 36 210
Partee (1973) 456 36 210
Partee (1973) 456 36 210
Partee (1973) 456 36 210
Grandy (1973) 378 66 12
Grandy (1973) 378 66 12
Grandy (1973) 378 66 12
Grandy (1973) 378 66 12
Grandy (1973) 378 66 12
Grandy (1973) 378 66 12

Citation Rank

Table 37: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1973.
Article Overall Early Late
Lewis (1973) 1 1 1
Lewis (1973) 1 1 1
Lewis (1973) 1 1 1
Lewis (1973) 1 1 1
Lewis (1973) 1 1 1
Lewis (1973) 1 1 1
Benacerraf (1973) 2 4 2
Benacerraf (1973) 2 4 2
Benacerraf (1973) 2 4 2
Benacerraf (1973) 2 4 2
Benacerraf (1973) 2 4 2
Benacerraf (1973) 2 4 2
Putnam (1973) 3 2 3
Putnam (1973) 3 2 3
Putnam (1973) 3 2 3
Putnam (1973) 3 2 3
Putnam (1973) 3 2 3
Putnam (1973) 3 2 3
Field (1973) 4 5 5
Field (1973) 4 5 5
Field (1973) 4 5 5
Field (1973) 4 5 5
Field (1973) 4 5 5
Field (1973) 4 5 5
Kim (1973) 5 3 8
Kim (1973) 5 3 8
Kim (1973) 5 3 8
Kim (1973) 5 3 8
Kim (1973) 5 3 8
Kim (1973) 5 3 8
Burge (1973) 6 6 4
Burge (1973) 6 6 4
Burge (1973) 6 6 4
Burge (1973) 6 6 4
Burge (1973) 6 6 4
Burge (1973) 6 6 4
van Fraassen (1973) 7 6 7
van Fraassen (1973) 7 6 7
van Fraassen (1973) 7 6 7
van Fraassen (1973) 7 6 7
van Fraassen (1973) 7 6 7
van Fraassen (1973) 7 6 7
Partee (1973) 8 13 6
Partee (1973) 8 13 6
Partee (1973) 8 13 6
Partee (1973) 8 13 6
Partee (1973) 8 13 6
Partee (1973) 8 13 6
Grandy (1973) 9 8 24
Grandy (1973) 9 8 24
Grandy (1973) 9 8 24
Grandy (1973) 9 8 24
Grandy (1973) 9 8 24
Grandy (1973) 9 8 24

3.18 1974

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Michael Friedman (1974) “Explanation and Scientific Understanding”
  2. Michael Friedman (1974) “Explanation and Scientific Understanding”
  3. Michael Friedman (1974) “Explanation and Scientific Understanding”
  4. Michael Friedman (1974) “Explanation and Scientific Understanding”
  5. Michael Friedman (1974) “Explanation and Scientific Understanding”
  6. Michael Friedman (1974) “Explanation and Scientific Understanding”
  7. Isaac Levi (1974) “On Indeterminate Probabilities”
  8. Isaac Levi (1974) “On Indeterminate Probabilities”
  9. Isaac Levi (1974) “On Indeterminate Probabilities”
  10. Isaac Levi (1974) “On Indeterminate Probabilities”
  11. Isaac Levi (1974) “On Indeterminate Probabilities”
  12. Isaac Levi (1974) “On Indeterminate Probabilities”
  13. Thomas Nagel (1974) “What is It Like To Be a Bat”
  14. Michael Devitt (1974) “Singular Terms”
  15. Michael Devitt (1974) “Singular Terms”
  16. Michael Devitt (1974) “Singular Terms”
  17. Michael Devitt (1974) “Singular Terms”
  18. Michael Devitt (1974) “Singular Terms”
  19. Michael Devitt (1974) “Singular Terms”
  20. Tyler Burge (1974) “Demonstrative Constructions, Reference, and Truth”
  21. Tyler Burge (1974) “Demonstrative Constructions, Reference, and Truth”
  22. Tyler Burge (1974) “Demonstrative Constructions, Reference, and Truth”
  23. Tyler Burge (1974) “Demonstrative Constructions, Reference, and Truth”
  24. Tyler Burge (1974) “Demonstrative Constructions, Reference, and Truth”
  25. Tyler Burge (1974) “Demonstrative Constructions, Reference, and Truth”
  26. Richard C. Jeffrey (1974) “Preference Among Preferences”
  27. Richard C. Jeffrey (1974) “Preference Among Preferences”
  28. Richard C. Jeffrey (1974) “Preference Among Preferences”
  29. Richard C. Jeffrey (1974) “Preference Among Preferences”
  30. Richard C. Jeffrey (1974) “Preference Among Preferences”
  31. Richard C. Jeffrey (1974) “Preference Among Preferences”
  32. Terence Parsons (1974) “A Prolegomenon to Meinongian Semantics”
  33. Terence Parsons (1974) “A Prolegomenon to Meinongian Semantics”
  34. Terence Parsons (1974) “A Prolegomenon to Meinongian Semantics”
  35. Terence Parsons (1974) “A Prolegomenon to Meinongian Semantics”
  36. Terence Parsons (1974) “A Prolegomenon to Meinongian Semantics”
  37. Terence Parsons (1974) “A Prolegomenon to Meinongian Semantics”
  38. Louis E. Loeb (1974) “Causal Theories and Causal Overdetermination”
  39. Louis E. Loeb (1974) “Causal Theories and Causal Overdetermination”
  40. Louis E. Loeb (1974) “Causal Theories and Causal Overdetermination”
  41. Louis E. Loeb (1974) “Causal Theories and Causal Overdetermination”
  42. Louis E. Loeb (1974) “Causal Theories and Causal Overdetermination”
  43. Louis E. Loeb (1974) “Causal Theories and Causal Overdetermination”
  44. Charles Parsons (1974) “The Liar Paradox”

Citation Count

Table 38: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1974.
Article All Early Late
M. Friedman (1974) 1470 72 714
M. Friedman (1974) 1470 72 714
M. Friedman (1974) 1470 72 714
M. Friedman (1974) 1470 72 714
M. Friedman (1974) 1470 72 714
M. Friedman (1974) 1470 72 714
Levi (1974) 828 90 414
Levi (1974) 828 90 414
Levi (1974) 828 90 414
Levi (1974) 828 90 414
Levi (1974) 828 90 414
Levi (1974) 828 90 414
Nagel (1974) 644 16 312
Devitt (1974) 300 150 78
Devitt (1974) 300 150 78
Devitt (1974) 300 150 78
Devitt (1974) 300 150 78
Devitt (1974) 300 150 78
Devitt (1974) 300 150 78
Burge (1974) 234 72 24
Burge (1974) 234 72 24
Burge (1974) 234 72 24
Burge (1974) 234 72 24
Burge (1974) 234 72 24
Burge (1974) 234 72 24
Jeffrey (1974) 204 48 30
Jeffrey (1974) 204 48 30
Jeffrey (1974) 204 48 30
Jeffrey (1974) 204 48 30
Jeffrey (1974) 204 48 30
Jeffrey (1974) 204 48 30
T. Parsons (1974) 198 102 60
T. Parsons (1974) 198 102 60
T. Parsons (1974) 198 102 60
T. Parsons (1974) 198 102 60
T. Parsons (1974) 198 102 60
T. Parsons (1974) 198 102 60
Loeb (1974) 102 66 0
Loeb (1974) 102 66 0
Loeb (1974) 102 66 0
Loeb (1974) 102 66 0
Loeb (1974) 102 66 0
Loeb (1974) 102 66 0
C. Parsons (1974) 73 10 33

Citation Rank

Table 39: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1974.
Article Overall Early Late
M. Friedman (1974) 1 4 1
M. Friedman (1974) 1 4 1
M. Friedman (1974) 1 4 1
M. Friedman (1974) 1 4 1
M. Friedman (1974) 1 4 1
M. Friedman (1974) 1 4 1
Levi (1974) 2 3 2
Levi (1974) 2 3 2
Levi (1974) 2 3 2
Levi (1974) 2 3 2
Levi (1974) 2 3 2
Levi (1974) 2 3 2
Nagel (1974) 3 24 3
Devitt (1974) 4 1 4
Devitt (1974) 4 1 4
Devitt (1974) 4 1 4
Devitt (1974) 4 1 4
Devitt (1974) 4 1 4
Devitt (1974) 4 1 4
Burge (1974) 5 4 10
Burge (1974) 5 4 10
Burge (1974) 5 4 10
Burge (1974) 5 4 10
Burge (1974) 5 4 10
Burge (1974) 5 4 10
Jeffrey (1974) 6 8 7
Jeffrey (1974) 6 8 7
Jeffrey (1974) 6 8 7
Jeffrey (1974) 6 8 7
Jeffrey (1974) 6 8 7
Jeffrey (1974) 6 8 7
T. Parsons (1974) 7 2 5
T. Parsons (1974) 7 2 5
T. Parsons (1974) 7 2 5
T. Parsons (1974) 7 2 5
T. Parsons (1974) 7 2 5
T. Parsons (1974) 7 2 5
Loeb (1974) 9 6 163
Loeb (1974) 9 6 163
Loeb (1974) 9 6 163
Loeb (1974) 9 6 163
Loeb (1974) 9 6 163
Loeb (1974) 9 6 163
C. Parsons (1974) 14 31 6

3.19 1975

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Saul Kripke (1975) “Outline of a Theory of Truth”
  2. Robert Cummins (1975) “Functional Analysis”
  3. Gary Watson (1975) “Free Agency”
  4. Allan Gibbard (1975) “Contingent Identity”
  5. Robert C. Stalnaker (1975) “Indicative Conditionals”
  6. Gilbert Harman (1975) “Moral Relativism Defended”
  7. Dorothy L. Grover, Joseph L. Camp Jr., and Nuel D. Belnap Jr. (1975) “A Pro-Sentential Theory of Truth”
  8. Geoffrey Paul Hellman and Frank Wilson Thompson (1975) “Physicalism: Ontology, Determination, and Reduction”
  9. David Kaplan (1975) “Sets, Concepts and Extensions: How To Russell a Frege-Church”

Citation Count

Table 40: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1975.
Article All Early Late
Kripke (1975) 455 48 220
Cummins (1975) 347 17 152
Watson (1975) 230 20 111
Gibbard (1975) 142 5 62
Stalnaker (1975) 135 3 98
Harman (1975) 109 14 47
Grover, Camp, and Belnap (1975) 86 14 22
Hellman and Thompson (1975) 73 19 6
D. Kaplan (1975) 66 15 18

Citation Rank

Table 41: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1975.
Article Overall Early Late
Kripke (1975) 1 1 1
Cummins (1975) 2 4 2
Watson (1975) 3 2 3
Gibbard (1975) 4 43 5
Stalnaker (1975) 5 79 4
Harman (1975) 6 6 6
Grover, Camp, and Belnap (1975) 7 6 13
Hellman and Thompson (1975) 8 3 37
D. Kaplan (1975) 9 5 17

3.20 1976

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Alvin I. Goldman (1976) “Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge”
  2. David Lewis (1976b) “Probabilities of Conditionals and Conditional Probabilities”
  3. David Lewis (1976a) “Paradoxes of Time Travel”
  4. Michael Stocker (1976) “The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories”
  5. Gilbert Harman (1976) “Practical Reasoning”
  6. Robert C. Stalnaker (1976) “Possible Worlds”
  7. J. Michael Dunn (1976) “Intuitive Semantics for First-Degree Entailments and Coupled Trees”
  8. Robert Merrihew Adams (1976) “Motive Utilitarianism”
  9. Brian Loar (1976) “The Semantics of Singular Terms”

Citation Count

Table 42: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1976.
Article All Early Late
Goldman (1976) 406 48 199
Lewis (1976b) 260 29 125
Lewis (1976a) 173 12 110
Stocker (1976) 150 10 64
Harman (1976) 137 14 70
Stalnaker (1976) 99 10 57
Dunn (1976) 91 7 62
R. M. Adams (1976) 55 11 18
Loar (1976) 47 11 20

Citation Rank

Table 43: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1976.
Article Overall Early Late
Goldman (1976) 1 1 1
Lewis (1976b) 2 2 2
Lewis (1976a) 3 5 3
Stocker (1976) 4 10 5
Harman (1976) 5 4 4
Stalnaker (1976) 6 10 7
Dunn (1976) 8 22 6
R. M. Adams (1976) 10 6 15
Loar (1976) 11 6 11

3.21 1977

Widely Cited Articles

  1. John Perry (1977) “Frege on Demonstratives”
  2. Stephen L. Darwall (1977) “Two Kinds of Respect”
  3. Fred Dretske (1977) “Laws of Nature”
  4. Michael Tooley (1977) “Nature of Laws”
  5. John M. Taurek (1977) “Should the Numbers Count?”
  6. Tyler Burge (1977) “Belief De Re”
  7. Christopher Boorse (1977) “Health as a Theoretical Concept”
  8. Hartry Field (1977) “Logic, Meaning, and Conceptual Role”
  9. Hector-Neri Castañeda (1977) “Perception, Belief, and Structure of Physical Objects and Consciousness”

Citation Count

Table 44: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1977.
Article All Early Late
Perry (1977) 204 32 83
Darwall (1977) 203 3 145
Dretske (1977) 196 18 87
Tooley (1977) 182 15 86
Taurek (1977) 152 12 82
Burge (1977) 115 33 30
Boorse (1977) 114 3 77
Field (1977) 84 21 22
Castañeda (1977) 37 27 1

Citation Rank

Table 45: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1977.
Article Overall Early Late
Perry (1977) 1 2 4
Darwall (1977) 2 87 1
Dretske (1977) 3 5 2
Tooley (1977) 4 6 3
Taurek (1977) 5 10 5
Burge (1977) 6 1 10
Boorse (1977) 7 87 6
Field (1977) 9 4 15
Castañeda (1977) 19 3 164

3.22 1978

Widely Cited Articles

  1. David Lewis (1978) “Truth in Fiction”
  2. David L. Hull (1978) “A Matter of Individuality”
  3. Kendall L. Walton (1978) “Fearing Fictions”
  4. Stephen P. Stich (1978) “Beliefs and Subdoxastic States”
  5. Harry G. Frankfurt (1978) “The Problem of Action”
  6. Paul R. Thagard (1978) “The Best Explanation: Criteria for Theory Choice”
  7. Jaegwon Kim (1978) “Supervenience and Nomological Incommensurables”
  8. Laurence BonJour (1978) “Can Empirical Knowledge Have a Foundation?”
  9. Gregory S. Kavka (1978) “Some Paradoxes of Deterrence”

Citation Count

Table 46: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1978.
Article All Early Late
Lewis (1978) 177 18 110
Hull (1978) 146 16 52
Walton (1978) 99 22 45
Stich (1978) 94 5 41
Frankfurt (1978) 86 7 62
Thagard (1978) 86 9 50
Kim (1978) 76 33 2
BonJour (1978) 55 18 16
Kavka (1978) 45 19 4

Citation Rank

Table 47: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1978.
Article Overall Early Late
Lewis (1978) 1 4 1
Hull (1978) 2 7 3
Walton (1978) 3 2 6
Stich (1978) 4 48 7
Frankfurt (1978) 5 28 2
Thagard (1978) 5 21 4
Kim (1978) 7 1 95
BonJour (1978) 12 4 15
Kavka (1978) 18 3 59

3.23 1979

Widely Cited Articles

  1. John Perry (1979) “The Problem of the Essential Indexical”
  2. David Lewis (1979a) “Attitudes De Dicto and De Se”
  3. David Lewis (1979c) “Scorekeeping in a Language Game”
  4. David Lewis (1979b) “Counterfactual Dependence and Time’s Arrow”
  5. John McDowell (1979) “Virtue and Reason”
  6. Graham Priest (1979) “The Logic of Paradox”
  7. Norman Daniels (1979) “Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics”
  8. Nancy Cartwright (1979) “Causal Laws and Effective Strategies”
  9. Daniel Lascar and Bruno Poizat (1979) “Introduction To Forking”

Citation Count

Table 48: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1979.
Article All Early Late
Perry (1979) 420 61 188
Lewis (1979a) 411 33 247
Lewis (1979c) 402 17 232
Lewis (1979b) 381 38 200
McDowell (1979) 229 13 95
Priest (1979) 213 16 146
Daniels (1979) 149 41 54
Cartwright (1979) 130 29 50
Lascar and Poizat (1979) 34 23 1

Citation Rank

Table 49: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1979.
Article Overall Early Late
Perry (1979) 1 1 4
Lewis (1979a) 2 4 1
Lewis (1979c) 3 11 2
Lewis (1979b) 4 3 3
McDowell (1979) 5 15 6
Priest (1979) 6 12 5
Daniels (1979) 7 2 9
Cartwright (1979) 8 5 10
Lascar and Poizat (1979) 32 6 197

3.24 1980

Widely Cited Articles

  1. John Rawls (1980) “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory”
  2. Martin Davies and Lloyd Humberstone (1980) “Two Notions of Necessity”
  3. Hilary Putnam (1980) “Models and Reality”
  4. Jerrold Levinson (1980) “What a Musical Work Is”
  5. Elliot Sober (1980) “Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism”
  6. Ruth Barcan Marcus (1980) “Moral Dilemmas and Consistency”
  7. David Lewis (1980) “Veridical Hallucination and Prosthetic Vision”
  8. Norman Daniels (1980) “Reflective Equilibrium and Archimedean Points”

Citation Count

Table 50: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1980.
Article All Early Late
Rawls (1980) 202 56 61
Davies and Humberstone (1980) 124 3 63
Putnam (1980) 115 21 55
Levinson (1980) 103 10 58
Sober (1980) 90 8 40
Marcus (1980) 88 24 36
Lewis (1980) 82 9 45
Daniels (1980) 42 22 9

Citation Rank

Table 51: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1980.
Article Overall Early Late
Rawls (1980) 1 1 2
Davies and Humberstone (1980) 2 112 1
Putnam (1980) 3 4 4
Levinson (1980) 4 11 3
Sober (1980) 5 20 6
Marcus (1980) 6 2 7
Lewis (1980) 7 13 5
Daniels (1980) 11 3 32

3.25 1981

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Paul M. Churchland (1981) “Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes”
  2. Larry Laudan (1981) “A Confutation of Convergent Realism”
  3. Philip Kitcher (1981) “Explanatory Unification”
  4. Jon Barwise and Robin Cooper (1981) “Generalized Quantifiers and Natural-Language”
  5. Ronald Dworkin (1981b) “What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources”
  6. David Lewis (1981) “Causal Decision Theory”
  7. Peter van Inwagen (1981) “The Doctrine of Arbitrary Undetached Parts”
  8. Ronald Dworkin (1981a) “What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare”
  9. John Dupré (1981) “Natural Kinds and Biological Taxa”

Citation Count

Table 52: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1981.
Article All Early Late
Churchland (1981) 281 59 113
Laudan (1981) 275 28 142
Kitcher (1981) 247 10 135
Barwise and Cooper (1981) 222 39 87
Dworkin (1981b) 208 25 79
Lewis (1981) 173 35 99
van Inwagen (1981) 105 4 36
Dworkin (1981a) 97 19 28
Dupré (1981) 93 16 26

Citation Rank

Table 53: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1981.
Article Overall Early Late
Churchland (1981) 1 1 3
Laudan (1981) 2 4 1
Kitcher (1981) 3 17 2
Barwise and Cooper (1981) 4 2 5
Dworkin (1981b) 5 5 6
Lewis (1981) 6 3 4
van Inwagen (1981) 7 86 11
Dworkin (1981a) 8 6 14
Dupré (1981) 10 7 17

3.26 1982

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Frank Jackson (1982) “Epiphenomenal Qualia”
  2. Susan Wolf (1982) “Moral Saints”
  3. Elizabeth W. Prior, Robert Pargetter, and Frank Jackson (1982) “Three Theses About Dispositions”
  4. Chris Swoyer (1982) “The Nature of Natural Laws”
  5. Anil Gupta (1982) “Truth and Paradox”
  6. David Lewis (1982) “Logic for Equivocators”
  7. Jaegwon Kim (1982) “Psychophysical Supervenience”
  8. Harry G. Frankfurt (1982) “The Importance of What We Care About”
  9. Dudley Shapere (1982) “The Concept of Observation in Science and Philosophy”

Citation Count

Table 54: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1982.
Article All Early Late
Jackson (1982) 473 25 238
Wolf (1982) 161 18 74
E. W. Prior, Pargetter, and Jackson (1982) 132 10 64
Swoyer (1982) 107 7 46
Gupta (1982) 91 25 39
Lewis (1982) 89 4 74
Kim (1982) 80 20 17
Frankfurt (1982) 57 5 46
Shapere (1982) 50 22 11

Citation Rank

Table 55: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1982.
Article Overall Early Late
Jackson (1982) 1 2 1
Wolf (1982) 2 7 2
E. W. Prior, Pargetter, and Jackson (1982) 3 18 4
Swoyer (1982) 4 42 5
Gupta (1982) 5 2 7
Lewis (1982) 6 93 2
Kim (1982) 8 5 21
Frankfurt (1982) 12 65 5
Shapere (1982) 16 4 41

3.27 1983

Widely Cited Articles

  1. David Lewis (1983) “New Work for a Theory of Universals”
  2. Joseph Levine (1983) “Materialism and Qualia: The Explanatory Gap”
  3. Gregory S. Kavka (1983) “The Toxin Puzzle”
  4. Christine M. Korsgaard (1983) “Two Distinctions in Goodness”
  5. Robert Brandom (1983) “Asserting”
  6. Judith Jarvis Thomson (1983) “Parthood and Identity Across Time”
  7. Hilary Kornblith (1983) “Justified Belief and Epistemically Responsible Action”
  8. Alvin Plantinga (1983) “On Existentialism”
  9. Ellery Eells and Elliot Sober (1983) “Probabilistic Causality and the Question of Transitivity”

Citation Count

Table 56: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1983.
Article All Early Late
Lewis (1983) 768 45 524
Levine (1983) 214 3 107
Kavka (1983) 167 15 87
Korsgaard (1983) 140 6 91
Brandom (1983) 106 6 65
Thomson (1983) 97 7 34
Kornblith (1983) 84 21 41
Plantinga (1983) 83 8 50
Eells and Sober (1983) 41 21 5

Citation Rank

Table 57: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1983.
Article Overall Early Late
Lewis (1983) 1 1 1
Levine (1983) 2 126 2
Kavka (1983) 3 4 4
Korsgaard (1983) 4 40 3
Brandom (1983) 5 40 5
Thomson (1983) 6 31 12
Kornblith (1983) 8 2 9
Plantinga (1983) 9 22 6
Eells and Sober (1983) 16 2 72

3.28 1984

Widely Cited Articles

  1. David Lewis (1984) “Putnam’s Paradox”
  2. Bas C. van Fraassen (1984) “Belief and the Will”
  3. Peter Railton (1984) “Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality”
  4. George Boolos (1984) “To Be is To Be a Value of a Variable (Or To Be Some Values of Some Variables)”
  5. Jaegwon Kim (1984) “Concepts of Supervenience”
  6. Stewart Cohen (1984) “Justification and Truth”
  7. Philip Kitcher (1984) “Species”
  8. Kevin Mulligan, Peter Simons, and Barry Smith (1984) “Truth-Makers”
  9. Jerry A. Fodor (1984) “Observation Reconsidered”

Citation Count

Table 58: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1984.
Article All Early Late
Lewis (1984) 229 18 130
van Fraassen (1984) 210 21 102
Railton (1984) 201 19 114
Boolos (1984) 198 14 108
Kim (1984) 163 52 35
S. Cohen (1984) 152 10 102
Kitcher (1984) 116 18 45
Mulligan, Simons, and Smith (1984) 97 8 52
Fodor (1984) 89 22 37

Citation Rank

Table 59: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1984.
Article Overall Early Late
Lewis (1984) 1 6 1
van Fraassen (1984) 2 3 4
Railton (1984) 3 4 2
Boolos (1984) 4 13 3
Kim (1984) 5 1 13
S. Cohen (1984) 6 21 4
Kitcher (1984) 7 6 9
Mulligan, Simons, and Smith (1984) 9 30 6
Fodor (1984) 10 2 11

3.29 1985

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Carlos E. Alchourrón, Peter Gärdenfors, and David Makinson (1985) “On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Contraction and Revision Functions”
  2. Richard Feldman and Earl Conee (1985) “Evidentialism”
  3. John Hardwig (1985) “Epistemic Dependence”
  4. Ernan McMullin (1985) “Galilean Idealization”
  5. Vann McGee (1985) “A Counterexample To Modus Ponens”
  6. John Rawls (1985) “Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical”
  7. William P. Alston (1985) “Concepts of Epistemic Justification”
  8. Richard Feldman (1985) “Reliability and Justification”
  9. Paul M. Churchland (1985) “Reduction, Qualia, and the Direct Introspection of Brain States”

Citation Count

Table 60: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1985.
Article All Early Late
Alchourrón, Gärdenfors, and Makinson (1985) 264 23 120
Feldman and Conee (1985) 174 6 119
Hardwig (1985) 155 10 100
McMullin (1985) 142 4 89
McGee (1985) 132 8 98
Rawls (1985) 105 48 25
Alston (1985) 92 18 44
Feldman (1985) 78 20 29
Churchland (1985) 74 22 16

Citation Rank

Table 61: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1985.
Article Overall Early Late
Alchourrón, Gärdenfors, and Makinson (1985) 1 2 1
Feldman and Conee (1985) 2 40 2
Hardwig (1985) 3 12 3
McMullin (1985) 4 80 5
McGee (1985) 5 19 4
Rawls (1985) 7 1 12
Alston (1985) 8 5 8
Feldman (1985) 10 4 10
Churchland (1985) 11 3 23

3.30 1986

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Peter Railton (1986) “Moral Realism”
  2. Tyler Burge (1986a) “Individualism and Psychology”
  3. Annette Baier (1986) “Trust and Antitrust”
  4. Christine M. Korsgaard (1986) “Skepticism About Practical Reason”
  5. David M. Rosenthal (1986) “Two Concepts of Consciousness”
  6. Frank Jackson and Robert Pargetter (1986) “Oughts, Options, and Actualism”
  7. Tyler Burge (1986b) “Intellectual Norms and Foundations of Mind”
  8. Ruth Garrett Millikan (1986) “Thoughts Without Laws, Cognitive Science With Content”

Citation Count

Table 62: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1986.
Article All Early Late
Railton (1986) 240 38 116
Burge (1986a) 186 60 52
Baier (1986) 172 24 107
Korsgaard (1986) 155 15 75
Rosenthal (1986) 125 16 47
Jackson and Pargetter (1986) 103 10 69
Burge (1986b) 103 17 39
Millikan (1986) 42 23 3

Citation Rank

Table 63: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1986.
Article Overall Early Late
Railton (1986) 1 2 1
Burge (1986a) 2 1 5
Baier (1986) 3 3 2
Korsgaard (1986) 4 8 3
Rosenthal (1986) 5 7 6
Jackson and Pargetter (1986) 6 19 4
Burge (1986b) 6 5 9
Millikan (1986) 22 4 139

3.31 1987

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Michael Smith (1987) “The Humean Theory of Motivation”
  2. Harry G. Frankfurt (1987) “Equality as a Moral Ideal”
  3. John Bigelow and Robert Pargetter (1987) “Functions”
  4. John Earman and John Norton (1987) “What Price Spacetime Substantivalism: The Hole Story”
  5. Dennis W. Stampe (1987) “The Authority of Desire”
  6. Larry S. Temkin (1987) “Intransitivity and the Mere Addition Paradox”
  7. Thomas Nagel (1987) “Moral Conflict and Political Legitimacy”
  8. Margaret Gilbert (1987) “Modeling Collective Belief”
  9. Larry Laudan (1987) “Progress or Rationality: The Prospects for Normative Naturalism”

Citation Count

Table 64: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1987.
Article All Early Late
M. Smith (1987) 127 20 65
Frankfurt (1987) 94 1 62
Bigelow and Pargetter (1987) 92 23 33
Earman and Norton (1987) 83 21 36
Stampe (1987) 80 6 54
Temkin (1987) 76 4 43
Nagel (1987) 71 17 25
Gilbert (1987) 67 5 50
Laudan (1987) 54 28 10

Citation Rank

Table 65: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1987.
Article Overall Early Late
M. Smith (1987) 1 4 1
Frankfurt (1987) 2 304 2
Bigelow and Pargetter (1987) 3 2 7
Earman and Norton (1987) 4 3 6
Stampe (1987) 5 40 3
Temkin (1987) 6 74 5
Nagel (1987) 7 5 10
Gilbert (1987) 9 54 4
Laudan (1987) 13 1 37

3.32 1988

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Tyler Burge (1988) “Individualism and Self-Knowledge”
  2. James Bogen and James Woodward (1988) “Saving the Phenomena”
  3. Adam Grove (1988) “Two Modelings for Theory Change”
  4. Kim Sterelny and Philip Kitcher (1988) “The Return of the Gene”
  5. Shelley Kagan (1988) “The Additive Fallacy”
  6. William P. Alston (1988) “An Internalist Externalism”
  7. David Lewis (1988) “Desire as Belief”
  8. Frank Jackson and Philip Pettit (1988) “Functionalism and Broad Content”
  9. John Rawls (1988) “The Priority of Right and Ideas of the Good”

Citation Count

Table 66: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1988.
Article All Early Late
Burge (1988) 174 27 53
Bogen and Woodward (1988) 158 20 83
Grove (1988) 109 6 55
Sterelny and Kitcher (1988) 83 21 19
Kagan (1988) 76 11 39
Alston (1988) 70 7 44
Lewis (1988) 68 13 40
Jackson and Pettit (1988) 68 34 9
Rawls (1988) 45 27 13

Citation Rank

Table 67: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1988.
Article Overall Early Late
Burge (1988) 1 2 3
Bogen and Woodward (1988) 2 5 1
Grove (1988) 3 49 2
Sterelny and Kitcher (1988) 4 4 17
Kagan (1988) 5 18 6
Alston (1988) 6 37 4
Lewis (1988) 8 12 5
Jackson and Pettit (1988) 8 1 51
Rawls (1988) 18 2 37

3.33 1989

Widely Cited Articles

  1. G. A. Cohen (1989) “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice”
  2. Ruth Garrett Millikan (1989b) “In Defense of Proper Functions”
  3. Ruth Garrett Millikan (1989a) “Biosemantics”
  4. Paul A. Boghossian and J. David Velleman (1989) “Color as a Secondary Quality”
  5. Richard J. Arneson (1989) “Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare”
  6. Paul A. Boghossian (1989) “The Rule-Following Considerations”
  7. Mark Crimmins and John Perry (1989) “The Prince and the Phone Booth: Reporting Puzzling Beliefs”
  8. Don Marquis (1989) “Why Abortion is Immoral”
  9. Warren S. Quinn (1989) “Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Double Effect”

Citation Count

Table 68: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1989.
Article All Early Late
G. A. Cohen (1989) 271 32 117
Millikan (1989b) 183 40 88
Millikan (1989a) 180 39 94
Boghossian and Velleman (1989) 152 25 67
Arneson (1989) 152 14 72
Boghossian (1989) 114 19 44
Crimmins and Perry (1989) 107 34 43
Marquis (1989) 95 7 50
Quinn (1989) 84 16 50

Citation Rank

Table 69: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1989.
Article Overall Early Late
G. A. Cohen (1989) 1 4 1
Millikan (1989b) 2 1 3
Millikan (1989a) 3 2 2
Boghossian and Velleman (1989) 4 5 5
Arneson (1989) 4 11 4
Boghossian (1989) 6 7 10
Crimmins and Perry (1989) 7 3 11
Marquis (1989) 9 37 6
Quinn (1989) 10 9 6

3.34 1990

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Philip Kitcher (1990) “The Division of Cognitive Labor”
  2. Frank Jackson and Philip Pettit (1990) “Program Explanation: A General Perspective”
  3. Donald Davidson (1990) “The Structure and Content of Truth”
  4. Gideon Rosen (1990) “Modal Fictionalism”
  5. Tim Crane and D. H. Mellor (1990) “There is No Question of Physicalism”
  6. Jamie Dreier (1990) “Internalism and Speaker Relativism”
  7. Jonathan Vogel (1990) “Cartesian Skepticism and Inference To the Best Explanation”
  8. Jaegwon Kim (1990) “Supervenience as a Philosophical Concept”
  9. Graeme Forbes (1990) “The Indispensability of Sinn”

Citation Count

Table 70: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1990.
Article All Early Late
Kitcher (1990) 171 24 118
Jackson and Pettit (1990) 126 19 60
Davidson (1990) 123 44 32
Rosen (1990) 108 21 44
Crane and Mellor (1990) 100 35 30
Dreier (1990) 87 10 42
Vogel (1990) 75 8 46
Kim (1990) 61 25 22
Forbes (1990) 42 23 8

Citation Rank

Table 71: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1990.
Article Overall Early Late
Kitcher (1990) 1 4 1
Jackson and Pettit (1990) 2 9 2
Davidson (1990) 3 1 7
Rosen (1990) 4 7 4
Crane and Mellor (1990) 5 2 9
Dreier (1990) 6 19 5
Vogel (1990) 8 29 3
Kim (1990) 11 3 16
Forbes (1990) 21 5 53

3.35 1991

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Daniel C. Dennett (1991) “Real Patterns”
  2. Karen Neander (1991) “Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst’s Defense”
  3. Richard Boyd (1991) “Realism, Anti-foundationalism and the Enthusiasm for Natural Kinds”
  4. Frank Jackson (1991) “Decision-theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest Objection”
  5. Judith Jarvis Thomson (1991) “Self-Defense”
  6. Jeroen Groenendijk and Martin Stokhof (1991) “Dynamic Predicate Logic”
  7. John Hardwig (1991) “The Role of Trust in Knowledge”
  8. Stephen Schiffer (1991) “Ceteris Paribus Laws”
  9. Jerry A. Fodor (1991) “A Modal Argument for Narrow Content”

Citation Count

Table 72: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1991.
Article All Early Late
Dennett (1991) 202 30 126
Neander (1991) 191 44 91
Boyd (1991) 165 9 107
Jackson (1991) 150 10 108
Thomson (1991) 128 8 63
Groenendijk and Stokhof (1991) 122 26 64
Hardwig (1991) 113 10 74
Schiffer (1991) 60 25 14
Fodor (1991) 41 25 9

Citation Rank

Table 73: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1991.
Article Overall Early Late
Dennett (1991) 1 2 1
Neander (1991) 2 1 4
Boyd (1991) 3 32 3
Jackson (1991) 4 26 2
Thomson (1991) 5 43 8
Groenendijk and Stokhof (1991) 6 3 7
Hardwig (1991) 8 26 5
Schiffer (1991) 18 4 38
Fodor (1991) 28 4 58

3.36 1992

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Stephen Yablo (1992) “Mental Causation”
  2. Mark Johnston (1992) “How To Speak of the Colors”
  3. Keith DeRose (1992) “Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions”
  4. Jaegwon Kim (1992) “Multiple Realization and the Metaphysics of Reduction”
  5. Michael E. Bratman (1992) “Shared Cooperative Activity”
  6. Philip Kitcher (1992) “The Naturalists Return”
  7. Richard Foley (1992) “The Epistemology of Belief and the Epistemology of Degrees of Belief”
  8. Stephen Schiffer (1992) “Belief Ascription”
  9. Michael B. Burke (1992) “Copper Statues and Pieces of Copper: A Challenge To the Standard Account”

Citation Count

Table 74: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1992.
Article All Early Late
Yablo (1992) 302 52 149
Johnston (1992) 267 31 146
DeRose (1992) 246 12 142
Kim (1992) 133 27 55
Bratman (1992) 99 5 63
Kitcher (1992) 93 28 29
Foley (1992) 80 5 60
Schiffer (1992) 75 25 32
Burke (1992) 73 26 25

Citation Rank

Table 75: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1992.
Article Overall Early Late
Yablo (1992) 1 1 1
Johnston (1992) 2 2 2
DeRose (1992) 3 18 3
Kim (1992) 4 4 6
Bratman (1992) 5 85 4
Kitcher (1992) 6 3 20
Foley (1992) 10 85 5
Schiffer (1992) 12 6 17
Burke (1992) 13 5 24

3.37 1993

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Tyler Burge (1993) “Content Preservation”
  2. Stephen Yablo (1993a) “Is Conceivability a Guide To Possibility”
  3. Rae Langton (1993) “Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts”
  4. Stephen Yablo (1993b) “Paradox Without Self-Reference”
  5. Michael E. Bratman (1993) “Shared Intention”
  6. Terrence Horgan (1993) “From Supervenience To Superdupervenience: Meeting the Demands of a Material World”
  7. David Braun (1993) “Empty Names”
  8. Paul E. Griffiths (1993) “Functional Analysis and Proper Functions”
  9. Fred Dretske (1993) “Conscious Experience”

Citation Count

Table 76: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1993.
Article All Early Late
Burge (1993) 308 58 148
Yablo (1993a) 165 19 110
Langton (1993) 114 7 94
Yablo (1993b) 98 19 50
Bratman (1993) 86 5 54
Horgan (1993) 74 4 45
Braun (1993) 74 10 39
Griffiths (1993) 73 17 35
Dretske (1993) 72 26 22

Citation Rank

Table 77: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1993.
Article Overall Early Late
Burge (1993) 1 1 1
Yablo (1993a) 2 4 2
Langton (1993) 3 50 3
Yablo (1993b) 4 4 5
Bratman (1993) 5 73 4
Horgan (1993) 6 115 7
Braun (1993) 6 18 8
Griffiths (1993) 8 6 9
Dretske (1993) 9 2 17

3.38 1994

Widely Cited Articles

  1. David Lewis (1994) “Humean Supervenience Debugged”
  2. C. B. Martin (1994) “Dispositions and Conditionals”
  3. Malcom Forster and Elliot Sober (1994) “How To Tell When Simpler, More Unified, or Less Ad Hoc Theories Will Provide More Accurate Predictions”
  4. Hartry Field (1994) “Deflationist Views of Meaning and Content”
  5. Peter Godfrey-Smith (1994) “A Modern History Theory of Functions”
  6. Richard Holton (1994) “Deciding To Trust, Coming To Believe”
  7. Robert Audi (1994) “Dispositional Beliefs and Dispositions To Believe”
  8. Galen Strawson (1994) “The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility”
  9. Paul E. Griffiths and R. D. Gray (1994) “Developmental Systems and Evolutionary Explanation”

Citation Count

Table 78: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1994.
Article All Early Late
Lewis (1994) 300 41 194
C. B. Martin (1994) 202 31 97
Forster and Sober (1994) 134 39 65
Field (1994) 134 40 65
Godfrey-Smith (1994) 107 24 54
Holton (1994) 103 7 78
R. Audi (1994) 102 7 70
G. Strawson (1994) 101 12 75
Griffiths and Gray (1994) 96 35 30

Citation Rank

Table 79: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1994.
Article Overall Early Late
Lewis (1994) 1 1 1
C. B. Martin (1994) 2 7 2
Forster and Sober (1994) 3 4 6
Field (1994) 3 2 6
Godfrey-Smith (1994) 5 12 9
Holton (1994) 6 66 3
R. Audi (1994) 7 66 5
G. Strawson (1994) 8 29 4
Griffiths and Gray (1994) 9 5 21

3.39 1995

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Keith DeRose (1995) “Solving the Skeptical Problem”
  2. Dorothy Edgington (1995) “On Conditionals”
  3. Tim van Gelder (1995) “What Might Cognition Be, If Not Computation”
  4. David Widerker (1995) “Libertarianism and Frankfurt’s Attack on the Principle of Alternative Possibilities”
  5. Dean W. Zimmerman (1995) “Theories of Masses and Problems of Constitution”
  6. Noam Chomsky (1995) “Language and Nature”
  7. Karen Neander (1995) “Misrepresenting and Malfunctioning”
  8. John McDowell (1995) “Knowledge and the Internal”
  9. Kit Fine (1995) “The Logic of Essence”

Citation Count

Table 80: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1995.
Article All Early Late
DeRose (1995) 305 72 128
Edgington (1995) 205 29 121
van Gelder (1995) 106 20 67
Widerker (1995) 92 23 34
D. W. Zimmerman (1995) 88 34 29
Chomsky (1995) 87 27 46
Neander (1995) 84 27 42
McDowell (1995) 76 8 49
Fine (1995) 64 4 56

Citation Rank

Table 81: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1995.
Article Overall Early Late
DeRose (1995) 1 1 1
Edgington (1995) 2 3 2
van Gelder (1995) 3 10 3
Widerker (1995) 4 7 11
D. W. Zimmerman (1995) 5 2 15
Chomsky (1995) 6 4 6
Neander (1995) 7 4 7
McDowell (1995) 9 45 5
Fine (1995) 12 137 4

3.40 1996

Widely Cited Articles

  1. David Lewis (1996) “Elusive Knowledge”
  2. Timothy Williamson (1996) “Knowing and Asserting”
  3. Frank Veltman (1996) “Defaults in Update Semantics”
  4. Karen Jones (1996) “Trust as An Affective Attitude”
  5. Ronald Dworkin (1996) “Objectivity and Truth: You’d Better Believe It”
  6. Paul A. Boghossian (1996) “Analyticity Reconsidered”
  7. Theodore Sider (1996) “All the World’s a Stage”
  8. Alex Oliver (1996) “The Metaphysics of Properties”
  9. Donald Davidson (1996) “The Folly of Trying To Define Truth”

Citation Count

Table 82: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1996.
Article All Early Late
Lewis (1996) 503 106 287
Williamson (1996) 163 22 115
Veltman (1996) 144 10 117
Jones (1996) 122 6 92
Dworkin (1996) 102 19 68
Boghossian (1996) 99 12 59
Sider (1996) 88 19 49
Oliver (1996) 63 19 34
Davidson (1996) 62 29 21

Citation Rank

Table 83: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1996.
Article Overall Early Late
Lewis (1996) 1 1 1
Williamson (1996) 2 4 3
Veltman (1996) 3 33 2
Jones (1996) 4 86 4
Dworkin (1996) 5 6 5
Boghossian (1996) 6 23 6
Sider (1996) 7 6 8
Oliver (1996) 11 6 10
Davidson (1996) 14 2 33

3.41 1997

Widely Cited Articles

  1. David Lewis (1997) “Finkish Dispositions”
  2. Derek Parfit (1997) “Equality and Priority”
  3. Lynne Rudder Baker (1997) “Why Constitution is Not Identity”
  4. Robert Audi (1997) “The Place of Testimony in the Fabric of Knowledge and Justification”
  5. Christopher S. Hill (1997) “Imaginability, Conceivability, Possibility and the Mind-Body Problem”
  6. Tyler Burge (1997) “Interlocution, Perception, and Memory”
  7. R. M. Sainsbury (1997) “Easy Possibilities”
  8. Susan Wolf (1997) “Happiness and Meaning: Two Aspects of the Good Life”
  9. Michael J. Zimmerman (1997) “Moral Responsibility and Ignorance”

Citation Count

Table 84: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1997.
Article All Early Late
Lewis (1997) 216 39 123
Parfit (1997) 130 16 94
L. R. Baker (1997) 81 24 44
R. Audi (1997) 76 25 43
Hill (1997) 69 20 28
Burge (1997) 63 22 32
Sainsbury (1997) 61 9 43
Wolf (1997) 59 4 43
M. J. Zimmerman (1997) 59 4 50

Citation Rank

Table 85: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1997.
Article Overall Early Late
Lewis (1997) 1 1 1
Parfit (1997) 2 13 2
L. R. Baker (1997) 3 3 4
R. Audi (1997) 4 2 5
Hill (1997) 5 7 18
Burge (1997) 6 5 15
Sainsbury (1997) 8 47 5
Wolf (1997) 13 160 5
M. J. Zimmerman (1997) 13 160 3

3.42 1998

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Andy Clark and David J. Chalmers (1998) “The Extended Mind”
  2. James M. Joyce (1998) “A Nonpragmatic Vindication of Probabilism”
  3. James Ladyman (1998) “What is Structural Realism?”
  4. Nathan Salmon (1998) “Nonexistence”
  5. Alexander Bird (1998) “Dispositions and Antidotes”
  6. Rae Langton and David Lewis (1998) “Defining ‘Intrinsic’”
  7. Earl Conee and Richard Feldman (1998) “The Generality Problem for Reliabilism”
  8. Judith Jarvis Thomson (1998) “The Statue and the Clay”
  9. John McDowell (1998) “Having the World in View: Sellars, Kant, and Intentionality: Lecture I: Sellars on Perceptual Experience”

Citation Count

Table 86: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1998.
Article All Early Late
Clark and Chalmers (1998) 441 43 314
Joyce (1998) 241 10 214
Ladyman (1998) 143 28 86
Salmon (1998) 135 32 86
Bird (1998) 129 36 67
Langton and Lewis (1998) 128 42 66
Conee and Feldman (1998) 120 17 91
Thomson (1998) 95 38 48
McDowell (1998) 74 29 24

Citation Rank

Table 87: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1998.
Article Overall Early Late
Clark and Chalmers (1998) 1 1 1
Joyce (1998) 2 50 2
Ladyman (1998) 3 7 4
Salmon (1998) 4 5 4
Bird (1998) 5 4 6
Langton and Lewis (1998) 6 2 7
Conee and Feldman (1998) 7 20 3
Thomson (1998) 10 3 11
McDowell (1998) 13 6 24

3.43 1999

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Elizabeth S. Anderson (1999) “What is the Point of Equality?”
  2. John Broome (1999) “Normative Requirements”
  3. Ned Block and Robert C. Stalnaker (1999) “Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap”
  4. Jaegwon Kim (1999) “Making Sense of Emergence”
  5. William Bechtal and Jennifer Mundale (1999) “Multiple Realizability Revisited: Linking Cognitive and Neural States”
  6. J. David Velleman (1999) “Love as a Moral Emotion”
  7. Brandon Fitelson (1999) “The Plurality of Bayesian Measures of Confirmation and the Problem of Measure Sensitivity”
  8. Tomoji Shogenji (1999) “Is Coherence Truth Conducive?”
  9. John Hyman (1999) “How Knowledge Works”

Citation Count

Table 88: Citation count for widely cited articles from 1999.
Article All Early Late
Anderson (1999) 362 78 251
Broome (1999) 184 35 126
Block and Stalnaker (1999) 151 59 70
Kim (1999) 130 48 55
Bechtal and Mundale (1999) 114 38 54
Velleman (1999) 109 18 84
Fitelson (1999) 103 26 65
Shogenji (1999) 93 36 45
Hyman (1999) 89 11 70

Citation Rank

Table 89: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 1999.
Article Overall Early Late
Anderson (1999) 1 1 1
Broome (1999) 2 6 2
Block and Stalnaker (1999) 3 2 4
Kim (1999) 4 3 8
Bechtal and Mundale (1999) 5 4 10
Velleman (1999) 6 21 3
Fitelson (1999) 7 10 6
Shogenji (1999) 8 5 13
Hyman (1999) 9 46 4

3.44 2000

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden, and Carl F. Craver (2000) “Thinking About Mechanisms”
  2. James Pryor (2000) “The Skeptic and the Dogmatist”
  3. Sally Haslanger (2000) “Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them To Be?”
  4. David Lewis (2000) “Causation as Influence”
  5. Justin D’Arms and Dan Jacobson (2000) “The Moralistic Fallacy: On the ‘Appropriateness’ of Emotions”
  6. Jason Stanley and Zoltán Gendler Szabó (2000) “On Quantifier Domain Restriction”
  7. Heather Douglas (2000) “Inductive Risk and Values in Science”
  8. Jason Stanley (2000) “Context and Logical Form”
  9. Adam Elga (2000) “Self-Locating Belief and the ‘Sleeping Beauty’ Problem”

Citation Count

Table 90: Citation count for widely cited articles from 2000.
Article All Early Late
Machamer, Darden, and Craver (2000) 501 107 345
Pryor (2000) 371 58 275
Haslanger (2000) 232 11 219
Lewis (2000) 214 63 136
D’Arms and Jacobson (2000) 200 25 160
Stanley and Szabó (2000) 182 75 93
Douglas (2000) 153 8 138
Stanley (2000) 140 62 60
Elga (2000) 125 43 66

Citation Rank

Table 91: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 2000.
Article Overall Early Late
Machamer, Darden, and Craver (2000) 1 1 1
Pryor (2000) 2 5 2
Haslanger (2000) 3 57 3
Lewis (2000) 4 3 6
D’Arms and Jacobson (2000) 5 13 4
Stanley and Szabó (2000) 6 2 8
Douglas (2000) 7 98 5
Stanley (2000) 8 4 17
Elga (2000) 11 6 13

3.45 2001

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Jason Stanley and Timothy Williamson (2001) “Knowing How”
  2. Alex Byrne (2001) “Intentionalism Defended”
  3. David J. Chalmers and Frank Jackson (2001) “Conceptual Analysis and Reductive Explanation”
  4. Alvin I. Goldman (2001) “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?”
  5. Christopher Hitchcock (2001) “The Intransitivity of Causation Revealed in Equations and Graphs”
  6. Patrick Rysiew (2001) “The Context-Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions”
  7. Fred Adams and Ken Aizawa (2001) “The Bounds of Cognition”
  8. Christopher Peacocke (2001) “Does Perception Have a Nonconceptual Content?”
  9. Carl F. Craver (2001) “Role Functions, Mechanisms, and Hierarchy”

Citation Count

Table 92: Citation count for widely cited articles from 2001.
Article All Early Late
Stanley and Williamson (2001) 274 66 200
Byrne (2001) 175 64 104
Chalmers and Jackson (2001) 169 71 88
Goldman (2001) 162 16 143
Hitchcock (2001) 128 35 89
Rysiew (2001) 111 40 68
F. Adams and Aizawa (2001) 105 28 71
Peacocke (2001) 99 50 45
Craver (2001) 95 40 52

Citation Rank

Table 93: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 2001.
Article Overall Early Late
Stanley and Williamson (2001) 1 2 1
Byrne (2001) 2 3 3
Chalmers and Jackson (2001) 3 1 5
Goldman (2001) 4 34 2
Hitchcock (2001) 5 7 4
Rysiew (2001) 6 5 7
F. Adams and Aizawa (2001) 7 11 6
Peacocke (2001) 9 4 17
Craver (2001) 10 5 12

3.46 2002

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Michael G. F. Martin (2002) “The Transparency of Experience”
  2. Jeremy Fantl and Matthew McGrath (2002) “Evidence, Pragmatics, and Justification”
  3. Robert C. Stalnaker (2002) “Common Ground”
  4. Stuart Glennan (2002) “Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation”
  5. Stewart Cohen (2002) “Basic Knowledge and the Problem of Easy Knowledge”
  6. Ruth Chang (2002) “The Possibility of Parity”
  7. Crispin Wright (2002) “(Anti-)Sceptics Simple and Subtle: G.E. Moore and John McDowell”
  8. Mohan Matthen and André Ariew (2002) “Two Ways of Thinking About Fitness and Natural Selection”
  9. Christian List and Philip Pettit (2002) “Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result”

Citation Count

Table 94: Citation count for widely cited articles from 2002.
Article All Early Late
M. G. F. Martin (2002) 223 53 170
Fantl and McGrath (2002) 206 44 162
Stalnaker (2002) 181 21 160
Glennan (2002) 153 61 92
S. Cohen (2002) 148 44 104
Chang (2002) 145 27 118
Wright (2002) 113 44 69
Matthen and Ariew (2002) 94 46 48
List and Pettit (2002) 93 45 48

Citation Rank

Table 95: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 2002.
Article Overall Early Late
M. G. F. Martin (2002) 1 2 1
Fantl and McGrath (2002) 2 5 2
Stalnaker (2002) 3 24 3
Glennan (2002) 4 1 6
S. Cohen (2002) 5 5 5
Chang (2002) 6 13 4
Wright (2002) 7 5 10
Matthen and Ariew (2002) 10 3 14
List and Pettit (2002) 11 4 14

3.47 2003

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Keith DeRose (2003) “Assertion, Knowledge, and Context”
  2. Nishi Shah (2003) “How Truth Governs Belief”
  3. Joshua Knobe (2003) “Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language”
  4. Alan Hájek (2003) “What Conditional Probability Could Not Be”
  5. Tyler Burge (2003) “Perceptual Entitlement”
  6. Thomas Kelly (2003) “Epistemic Rationality as Instrumental Rationality: A Critique”
  7. Jonathan Schaffer (2003) “Is There a Fundamental Level?”
  8. John MacFarlane (2003) “Future Contingents and Relative Truth”
  9. Kit Fine (2003) “The Non-Identity of a Material Thing and Its Matter”

Citation Count

Table 96: Citation count for widely cited articles from 2003.
Article All Early Late
DeRose (2003) 209 68 141
Shah (2003) 165 40 125
Knobe (2003) 160 61 99
Hájek (2003) 148 39 109
Burge (2003) 133 38 95
Kelly (2003) 132 22 110
Schaffer (2003) 115 40 75
MacFarlane (2003) 110 44 66
Fine (2003) 102 39 63

Citation Rank

Table 97: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 2003.
Article Overall Early Late
DeRose (2003) 1 1 1
Shah (2003) 2 4 2
Knobe (2003) 3 2 5
Hájek (2003) 4 6 4
Burge (2003) 5 8 6
Kelly (2003) 6 23 3
Schaffer (2003) 7 4 9
MacFarlane (2003) 8 3 12
Fine (2003) 11 6 14

3.48 2004

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Wlodek Rabinowicz and Toni Rønnow‐Rasmussen (2004) “The Strike of the Demon: On Fitting Pro-Attitudes and Value”
  2. Charles Travis (2004) “The Silence of the Senses”
  3. Michael G. F. Martin (2004) “The Limits of Self-Awareness”
  4. David Pitt (2004) “The Phenomenology of Cognition, Or, What is It Like To Think That P?”
  5. Robert D. Rupert (2004) “Challenges To the Hypothesis of Extended Cognition”
  6. Mark Johnston (2004) “The Obscure Object of Hallucination”
  7. Ronald N. Giere (2004) “How Models Are Used To Represent Reality”
  8. David J. Chalmers (2004) “Epistemic Two-Dimensional Semantics”
  9. Jeff McMahan (2004) “The Ethics of Killing in War”

Citation Count

Table 98: Citation count for widely cited articles from 2004.
Article All Early Late
Rabinowicz and Rønnow‐Rasmussen (2004) 174 71 103
Travis (2004) 167 57 110
M. G. F. Martin (2004) 163 39 124
Pitt (2004) 131 47 84
Rupert (2004) 112 35 77
Johnston (2004) 111 29 82
Giere (2004) 106 31 75
Chalmers (2004) 90 40 50
McMahan (2004) 60 35 25

Citation Rank

Table 99: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 2004.
Article Overall Early Late
Rabinowicz and Rønnow‐Rasmussen (2004) 1 1 3
Travis (2004) 2 2 2
M. G. F. Martin (2004) 3 5 1
Pitt (2004) 4 3 4
Rupert (2004) 5 6 6
Johnston (2004) 6 14 5
Giere (2004) 7 11 7
Chalmers (2004) 8 4 10
McMahan (2004) 19 6 34

3.49 2005

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Niko Kolodny (2005) “Why Be Rational?”
  2. Nishi Shah and J. David Velleman (2005) “Doxastic Deliberation”
  3. Angela M. Smith (2005) “Responsibility for Attitudes: Activity and Passivity in Mental Life”
  4. Peter Lasersohn (2005) “Context Dependence, Disagreement, and Predicates of Personal Taste”
  5. Pamela Hieronymi (2005) “The Wrong Kind of Reason”
  6. Matthew Weiner (2005) “Must We Know What We Say?”
  7. Alan Baker (2005) “Are There Genuine Mathematical Explanations of Physical Phenomena?”
  8. Timothy Williamson (2005) “Contextualism, Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and Knowledge of Knowledge”
  9. Eddy Nahmias, Stephen Morris, Thomas Nadelhoffer, and Jason Turner (2005) “Surveying Freedom: Folk Intuitions About Free Will and Moral Responsibility”

Citation Count

Table 100: Citation count for widely cited articles from 2005.
Article All Early Late
Kolodny (2005) 254 61 193
Shah and Velleman (2005) 219 43 176
A. M. Smith (2005) 172 23 149
Lasersohn (2005) 162 59 103
Hieronymi (2005) 154 33 121
Weiner (2005) 132 45 87
A. Baker (2005) 130 28 102
Williamson (2005) 111 35 76
Nahmias et al. (2005) 66 33 33

Citation Rank

Table 101: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 2005.
Article Overall Early Late
Kolodny (2005) 1 1 1
Shah and Velleman (2005) 2 4 2
A. M. Smith (2005) 3 15 3
Lasersohn (2005) 4 2 5
Hieronymi (2005) 5 6 4
Weiner (2005) 6 3 7
A. Baker (2005) 7 13 6
Williamson (2005) 8 5 9
Nahmias et al. (2005) 17 6 29

3.50 2006

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Sharon Street (2006) “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value”
  2. Hilary Greaves and David Wallace (2006) “Justifying Conditionalization: Conditionalization Maximizes Expected Epistemic Utility”
  3. Igor Douven (2006) “Assertion, Knowledge, and Rational Credibility”
  4. Carl F. Craver (2006) “When Mechanistic Models Explain”
  5. Peter Godfrey-Smith (2006) “The Strategy of Model-Based Science”
  6. Roger White (2006) “Problems for Dogmatism”
  7. David Enoch (2006) “Agency, Shmagency: Why Normativity Won’t Come From What is Constitutive of Action”
  8. Nishi Shah (2006) “A New Argument for Evidentialism”
  9. Joshua Knobe (2006) “The Concept of Intentional Action: A Case Study in the Uses of Folk Psychology”

Citation Count

Table 102: Citation count for widely cited articles from 2006.
Article All Early Late
Street (2006) 277 50 227
Greaves and Wallace (2006) 137 18 119
Douven (2006) 124 43 81
Craver (2006) 120 32 88
Godfrey-Smith (2006) 119 40 79
White (2006) 116 46 70
Enoch (2006) 113 22 91
Shah (2006) 108 20 88
Knobe (2006) 57 39 18

Citation Rank

Table 103: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 2006.
Article Overall Early Late
Street (2006) 1 1 1
Greaves and Wallace (2006) 2 24 2
Douven (2006) 3 3 6
Craver (2006) 4 9 4
Godfrey-Smith (2006) 5 4 9
White (2006) 6 2 12
Enoch (2006) 8 17 3
Shah (2006) 9 21 4
Knobe (2006) 22 5 75

3.51 2007

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Adam Elga (2007) “Reflection and Disagreement”
  2. David Christensen (2007) “Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News”
  3. Seth Yalcin (2007) “Epistemic Modals”
  4. Jennifer Lackey (2007) “Norms of Assertion”
  5. Michael Huemer (2007) “Compassionate Phenomenal Conservatism”
  6. Michael Weisberg (2007) “Three Kinds of Idealization”
  7. Andy Egan (2007) “Epistemic Modals, Relativism and Assertion”
  8. John MacFarlane (2007) “Relativism and Disagreement”
  9. Shaun Nichols and Joshua Knobe (2007) “Moral Responsibility and Determinism: The Cognitive Science of Folk Intuitions”

Citation Count

Table 104: Citation count for widely cited articles from 2007.
Article All Early Late
Elga (2007) 292 86 206
Christensen (2007) 282 84 198
Yalcin (2007) 185 36 149
Lackey (2007) 176 51 125
Huemer (2007) 147 47 100
Weisberg (2007) 137 34 103
Egan (2007) 123 56 67
MacFarlane (2007) 114 56 58
Nichols and Knobe (2007) 106 51 55

Citation Rank

Table 105: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 2007.
Article Overall Early Late
Elga (2007) 1 1 1
Christensen (2007) 2 2 2
Yalcin (2007) 3 13 3
Lackey (2007) 4 5 4
Huemer (2007) 5 7 6
Weisberg (2007) 6 16 5
Egan (2007) 9 3 11
MacFarlane (2007) 11 3 16
Nichols and Knobe (2007) 12 5 21

3.52 2008

Widely Cited Articles

  1. John Hawthorne and Jason Stanley (2008) “Knowledge and Action”
  2. Tamar Szabò Gendler (2008) “Alief and Belief”
  3. Eric Schwitzgebel (2008) “The Unreliability of Naive Introspection”
  4. Stacey Swain, Joshua Alexander, and Jonathan M. Weinberg (2008) “The Instability of Philosophical Intuitions: Running Hot and Cold on Truetemp”
  5. Scott Sturgeon (2008) “Reason and the Grain of Belief”
  6. Jessica Brown (2008) “Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and the Knowledge Norm for Practical Reasoning”
  7. Michael Fara (2008) “Masked Abilities and Compatibilism”
  8. Pamela Hieronymi (2008) “Responsibility for Believing”
  9. David Manley and Ryan Wasserman (2008) “On Linking Dispositions and Conditionals”

Citation Count

Table 106: Citation count for widely cited articles from 2008.
Article All Early Late
Hawthorne and Stanley (2008) 257 88 169
Gendler (2008) 191 53 138
Schwitzgebel (2008) 112 39 73
S. Swain, Alexander, and Weinberg (2008) 101 54 47
Sturgeon (2008) 100 22 78
Brown (2008) 99 28 71
Fara (2008) 94 38 56
Hieronymi (2008) 91 25 66
Manley and Wasserman (2008) 86 34 52

Citation Rank

Table 107: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 2008.
Article Overall Early Late
Hawthorne and Stanley (2008) 1 1 1
Gendler (2008) 2 3 2
Schwitzgebel (2008) 3 4 4
S. Swain, Alexander, and Weinberg (2008) 4 2 17
Sturgeon (2008) 5 23 3
Brown (2008) 6 10 5
Fara (2008) 7 5 8
Hieronymi (2008) 8 15 6
Manley and Wasserman (2008) 9 6 13

3.53 2009

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Alison Hills (2009) “Moral Testimony and Moral Epistemology”
  2. John MacFarlane (2009) “Nonindexical Contextualism”
  3. Alan Baker (2009) “Mathematical Explanation in Science”
  4. Alex Byrne (2009) “Experience and Content”
  5. Jonathan Schaffer (2009) “Spacetime the One Substance”
  6. Jonathan Cohen and Craig Callender (2009) “A Better Best System Account of Lawhood”
  7. Mark Schroeder (2009) “Means-End Coherence, Stringency, and Subjective Reasons”
  8. Tim Bayne (2009) “Perception and the Reach of Phenomenal Content”
  9. Jonathan Quong (2009) “Killing in Self-Defense”

Citation Count

Table 108: Citation count for widely cited articles from 2009.
Article All Early Late
Hills (2009) 130 24 106
MacFarlane (2009) 90 51 39
A. Baker (2009) 89 22 67
Byrne (2009) 83 33 50
Schaffer (2009) 80 23 57
J. Cohen and Callender (2009) 78 14 64
Schroeder (2009) 77 29 48
Bayne (2009) 76 19 57
Quong (2009) 57 25 32

Citation Rank

Table 109: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 2009.
Article Overall Early Late
Hills (2009) 1 6 1
MacFarlane (2009) 2 1 19
A. Baker (2009) 3 9 2
Byrne (2009) 4 2 8
Schaffer (2009) 5 7 4
J. Cohen and Callender (2009) 6 49 3
Schroeder (2009) 8 3 11
Bayne (2009) 9 19 4
Quong (2009) 18 4 33

3.54 2010

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Jonathan Schaffer (2010a) “Monism: The Priority of the Whole”
  2. David Christensen (2010) “Higher-Order Evidence”
  3. Niko Kolodny and John MacFarlane (2010) “Ifs and Oughts”
  4. James Woodward (2010) “Causation in Biology: Stability, Specificity, and the Choice of Levels of Explanation”
  5. Eric Schwitzgebel (2010) “Acting Contrary To Our Professed Beliefs or the Gulf Between Occurrent Judgment and Dispositional Belief”
  6. Kevin J. S. Zollman (2010) “The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity”
  7. Julia Markovits (2010) “Acting for the Right Reasons”
  8. Jonathan Schaffer (2010b) “The Least Discerning and Most Promiscuous Truthmaker”
  9. Jonathan M. Weinberg, Chad Gonnerman, Cameron Buckner, and Joshua Alexander (2010) “Are Philosophers Expert Intuiters?”

Citation Count

Table 110: Citation count for widely cited articles from 2010.
Article All Early Late
Schaffer (2010a) 311 111 200
Christensen (2010) 144 40 104
Kolodny and MacFarlane (2010) 129 50 79
Woodward (2010) 119 35 84
Schwitzgebel (2010) 105 37 68
Zollman (2010) 101 17 84
Markovits (2010) 99 18 81
Schaffer (2010b) 97 46 51
Weinberg et al. (2010) 76 44 32

Citation Rank

Table 111: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 2010.
Article Overall Early Late
Schaffer (2010a) 1 1 1
Christensen (2010) 2 5 2
Kolodny and MacFarlane (2010) 3 2 7
Woodward (2010) 4 8 3
Schwitzgebel (2010) 5 7 8
Zollman (2010) 7 49 3
Markovits (2010) 8 41 5
Schaffer (2010b) 9 3 17
Weinberg et al. (2010) 17 4 44

3.55 2011

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Kristie Dotson (2011) “Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing”
  2. David J. Chalmers (2011) “Verbal Disputes”
  3. Karen Bennett (2011) “By Our Bootstraps”
  4. David Michael Kaplan and Carl F. Craver (2011) “The Explanatory Force of Dynamical and Mathematical Models in Neuroscience: A Mechanistic Perspective”
  5. C. S. Jenkins (2011) “Is Metaphysical Dependence Irreflexive?”
  6. David Christensen (2011) “Disagreement, Question-Begging and Epistemic Self-Criticism”
  7. Gualtiero Piccinini and Carl Craver (2011) “Integrating Psychology and Neuroscience: Functional Analyses as Mechanism Sketches”
  8. Timothy Sundell (2011) “Disagreements About Taste”
  9. Timothy Williamson (2011) “Philosophical Expertise and the Burden of Proof”

Citation Count

Table 112: Citation count for widely cited articles from 2011.
Article All Early Late
Dotson (2011) 161 12 149
Chalmers (2011) 117 31 86
Bennett (2011) 115 25 90
D. M. Kaplan and Craver (2011) 100 31 69
Jenkins (2011) 99 26 73
Christensen (2011) 97 40 57
Piccinini and Craver (2011) 91 30 61
Sundell (2011) 84 30 54
Williamson (2011) 65 30 35

Citation Rank

Table 113: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 2011.
Article Overall Early Late
Dotson (2011) 1 58 1
Chalmers (2011) 2 2 3
Bennett (2011) 3 13 2
D. M. Kaplan and Craver (2011) 4 2 5
Jenkins (2011) 5 12 4
Christensen (2011) 6 1 13
Piccinini and Craver (2011) 7 4 9
Sundell (2011) 10 4 14
Williamson (2011) 17 4 31

3.56 2012

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Duncan Pritchard (2012) “Anti-Luck Virtue Epistemology”
  2. Paul Audi (2012) “Grounding: Toward a Theory of the In-Virtue-Of Relation”
  3. Gaile Pohlhaus Jr. (2012) “Relational Knowing and Epistemic Injustice: Toward a Theory of Willful Hermeneutical Ignorance”
  4. Fiona Macpherson (2012) “Cognitive Penetration of Colour Experience: Rethinking the Issue in Light of An Indirect Mechanism”
  5. Pablo Cobreros, Paul Egre, David Ripley, and Robert Van Rooij (2012) “Tolerant, Classical, Strict”
  6. Eric Schwitzgebel and Fiery Cushman (2012) “Expertise in Moral Reasoning? Order Effects on Moral Judgment in Professional Philosophers and Non-Philosophers”
  7. Barry Loewer (2012) “Two Accounts of Laws and Time”
  8. Susanna Siegel (2012) “Cognitive Penetrability and Perceptual Justification”
  9. Elizabeth S. Anderson (2012) “Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions”

Citation Count

Table 114: Citation count for widely cited articles from 2012.
Article All Early Late
Pritchard (2012) 170 68 102
P. Audi (2012) 164 41 123
Pohlhaus (2012) 102 16 86
Macpherson (2012) 93 45 48
Cobreros et al. (2012) 91 24 67
Schwitzgebel and Cushman (2012) 89 41 48
Loewer (2012) 85 23 62
Siegel (2012) 81 35 46
Anderson (2012) 77 16 61

Citation Rank

Table 115: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 2012.
Article Overall Early Late
Pritchard (2012) 1 1 2
P. Audi (2012) 2 3 1
Pohlhaus (2012) 3 34 3
Macpherson (2012) 4 2 11
Cobreros et al. (2012) 5 11 4
Schwitzgebel and Cushman (2012) 6 3 11
Loewer (2012) 7 13 5
Siegel (2012) 8 5 14
Anderson (2012) 11 34 6

3.57 2013

Widely Cited Articles

  1. David Plunkett and Tim Sundell (2013) “Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms”
  2. Jane Friedman (2013) “Suspended Judgment”
  3. Louis deRosset (2013) “Grounding Explanations”
  4. Kelly Trogdon (2013) “Grounding: Necessary or Contingent?”
  5. David Ripley (2013) “Paradoxes and Failures of Cut”
  6. Marc Lange (2013) “What Makes a Scientific Explanation Distinctively Mathematical?”
  7. Selim Berker (2013) “Epistemic Teleology and the Separateness of Propositions”
  8. Pablo Cobreros, Paul Egre, David Ripley, and Robert Van Rooij (2013) “Reaching Transparent Truth”
  9. Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva (2013) “After-Birth Abortion: Why Should the Baby Live?”

Citation Count

Table 116: Citation count for widely cited articles from 2013.
Article All Early Late
Plunkett and Sundell (2013) 171 29 142
J. Friedman (2013) 96 17 79
deRosset (2013) 95 29 66
Trogdon (2013) 93 31 62
Ripley (2013) 83 26 57
Lange (2013) 80 27 53
Berker (2013) 76 15 61
Cobreros et al. (2013) 76 11 65
Giubilini and Minerva (2013) 37 29 8

Citation Rank

Table 117: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 2013.
Article Overall Early Late
Plunkett and Sundell (2013) 1 2 1
J. Friedman (2013) 2 18 2
deRosset (2013) 3 2 3
Trogdon (2013) 4 1 5
Ripley (2013) 5 6 7
Lange (2013) 6 5 9
Berker (2013) 7 22 6
Cobreros et al. (2013) 7 50 4
Giubilini and Minerva (2013) 43 2 281

3.58 2014

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Jessica M. Wilson (2014) “No Work for a Theory of Grounding”
  2. Miriam Schoenfield (2014) “Permission To Believe: Why Permissivism is True and What It Tells Us About Irrelevant Influences on Belief”
  3. Shamik Dasgupta (2014) “The Possibility of Physicalism”
  4. Jacob Ross and Mark Schroeder (2014) “Belief, Credence, and Pragmatic Encroachment”
  5. Paul A. Boghossian (2014) “What is Inference?”
  6. Sophie Horowitz (2014) “Epistemic Akrasia”
  7. Lara Buchak (2014) “Belief, Credence, and Norms”
  8. Robert W. Batterman and Collin C. Rice (2014) “Minimal Model Explanations”
  9. Stephan Leuenberger (2014) “Grounding and Necessity”

Citation Count

Table 118: Citation count for widely cited articles from 2014.
Article All Early Late
J. M. Wilson (2014) 187 67 120
Schoenfield (2014) 125 40 85
Dasgupta (2014) 122 37 85
Ross and Schroeder (2014) 120 33 87
Boghossian (2014) 109 29 80
Horowitz (2014) 109 28 81
Buchak (2014) 97 16 81
Batterman and Rice (2014) 93 35 58
Leuenberger (2014) 85 35 50

Citation Rank

Table 119: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 2014.
Article Overall Early Late
J. M. Wilson (2014) 1 1 1
Schoenfield (2014) 2 2 3
Dasgupta (2014) 3 3 3
Ross and Schroeder (2014) 4 6 2
Boghossian (2014) 5 10 7
Horowitz (2014) 5 12 5
Buchak (2014) 8 29 5
Batterman and Rice (2014) 9 4 9
Leuenberger (2014) 11 4 14

3.59 2015

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Alexander Skiles (2015) “Against Grounding Necessitarianism”
  2. Michael J. Raven (2015) “Ground”
  3. Collin Rice (2015) “Moving Beyond Causes: Optimality Models and Scientific Explanation”
  4. David Plunkett (2015) “Which Concepts Should We Use?: Metalinguistic Negotiations and the Methodology of Philosophy”
  5. James Woodward (2015) “Interventionism and Causal Exclusion”
  6. Kit Fine (2015) “Unified Foundations for Essence and Ground”
  7. John Bengson (2015) “The Intellectual Given”
  8. Jonathan Schaffer (2015) “What Not To Multiply Without Necessity”
  9. Neil Levy (2015) “Neither Fish Nor Fowl: Implicit Attitudes as Patchy Endorsements”

Citation Count

Table 120: Citation count for widely cited articles from 2015.
Article All Early Late
Skiles (2015) 121 35 86
Raven (2015) 73 20 53
Rice (2015) 62 22 40
Plunkett (2015) 61 7 54
Woodward (2015) 58 18 40
Fine (2015) 57 13 44
Bengson (2015) 56 14 42
Schaffer (2015) 52 10 42
Levy (2015) 50 21 29

Citation Rank

Table 121: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 2015.
Article Overall Early Late
Skiles (2015) 1 1 1
Raven (2015) 2 6 3
Rice (2015) 3 3 7
Plunkett (2015) 4 73 2
Woodward (2015) 5 9 7
Fine (2015) 6 16 4
Bengson (2015) 7 13 5
Schaffer (2015) 8 33 5
Levy (2015) 10 4 22

3.60 2016

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Jonathan Schaffer (2016) “Grounding in the Image of Causation”
  2. Cian Dorr (2016) “To Be F is To Be G”
  3. Alison Hills (2016) “Understanding Why”
  4. Eric Mandelbaum (2016) “Attitude, Inference, Association: On the Propositional Structure of Implicit Bias”
  5. Shamik Dasgupta (2016) “Metaphysical Rationalism”
  6. Conor McHugh and Jonathan Way (2016) “Fittingness First”
  7. Miranda Fricker (2016) “What’s the Point of Blame? a Paradigm Based Explanation”
  8. John Hawthorne, Daniel Rothschild, and Levi Spectre (2016) “Belief is Weak”
  9. Jakob Hohwy (2016) “The Self-Evidencing Brain”

Citation Count

Table 122: Citation count for widely cited articles from 2016.
Article All Early Late
Schaffer (2016) 168 56 112
Dorr (2016) 84 17 67
Hills (2016) 80 14 66
Mandelbaum (2016) 78 33 45
Dasgupta (2016) 71 30 41
McHugh and Way (2016) 68 21 47
Fricker (2016) 67 18 49
Hawthorne, Rothschild, and Spectre (2016) 66 18 48
Hohwy (2016) 61 22 39

Citation Rank

Table 123: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 2016.
Article Overall Early Late
Schaffer (2016) 1 1 1
Dorr (2016) 2 12 2
Hills (2016) 3 16 3
Mandelbaum (2016) 4 2 7
Dasgupta (2016) 5 3 9
McHugh and Way (2016) 6 5 6
Fricker (2016) 7 9 4
Hawthorne, Rothschild, and Spectre (2016) 8 9 5
Hohwy (2016) 9 4 12

3.61 2017

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Jane Friedman (2017) “Why Suspend Judging?”
  2. Jonathan Schaffer (2017) “The Ground Between the Gaps”
  3. Susanna Rinard (2017) “No Exception for Belief”
  4. Dennis Whitcomb, Heather Battaly, Jason Baehr, and Daniel Howard-Snyder (2017) “Intellectual Humility: Owning Our Limitations”
  5. Ole Thomassen Hjortland (2017) “Anti-Exceptionalism About Logic”
  6. Kit Fine (2017) “A Theory of Truthmaker Content I: Conjunction, Disjunction and Negation”
  7. Jason Stanley and Timothy Williamson (2017) “Skill”

Citation Count

Table 124: Citation count for widely cited articles from 2017.
Article All Early Late
J. Friedman (2017) 66 7 59
Schaffer (2017) 58 8 50
Rinard (2017) 50 10 40
Whitcomb et al. (2017) 50 14 36
Hjortland (2017) 49 8 41
Fine (2017) 46 7 39
Stanley and Williamson (2017) 41 13 28

Citation Rank

Table 125: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 2017.
Article Overall Early Late
J. Friedman (2017) 1 22 1
Schaffer (2017) 2 12 2
Rinard (2017) 3 5 4
Whitcomb et al. (2017) 3 1 6
Hjortland (2017) 5 12 3
Fine (2017) 6 22 5
Stanley and Williamson (2017) 8 2 11

3.62 2018

Widely Cited Articles

  1. David J. Chalmers (2018) “The Meta-Problem of Consciousness”
  2. Alastair Wilson (2018) “Metaphysical Causation”
  3. Alex Worsnip (2018) “The Conflict of Evidence and Coherence”
  4. Amia Srinivasan (2018) “The Aptness of Anger”
  5. Michael Prinzing (2018) “The Revisionist’s Rubric: Conceptual Engineering and the Discontinuity Objection”
  6. Selim Berker (2018) “The Unity of Grounding”
  7. Jelle Bruineberg, Julian Kiverstein, and Erik Rietveld (2018) “The Anticipating Brain is Not a Scientist: The Free-Energy Principle From An Ecological-Enactive Perspective”

Citation Count

Table 126: Citation count for widely cited articles from 2018.
Article All Early Late
Chalmers (2018) 70 48 22
A. Wilson (2018) 62 18 44
Worsnip (2018) 55 23 32
Srinivasan (2018) 41 9 32
Prinzing (2018) 41 7 34
Berker (2018) 37 16 21
Bruineberg, Kiverstein, and Rietveld (2018) 35 14 21

Citation Rank

Table 127: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 2018.
Article Overall Early Late
Chalmers (2018) 1 1 10
A. Wilson (2018) 2 3 1
Worsnip (2018) 3 2 3
Srinivasan (2018) 4 18 3
Prinzing (2018) 4 35 2
Berker (2018) 6 4 11
Bruineberg, Kiverstein, and Rietveld (2018) 7 5 11

3.63 2019

Widely Cited Articles

  1. Jane Friedman (2019) “Inquiry and Belief”
  2. Rima Basu (2019a) “The Wrongs of Racist Beliefs”
  3. Fabrice Correia and Alexander Skiles (2019) “Grounding, Essence, and Identity”
  4. Rima Basu (2019b) “What We Epistemically Owe To Each Other”
  5. Kevin Dorst (2019) “Lockeans Maximize Expected Accuracy”

Citation Count

Table 128: Citation count for widely cited articles from 2019.
Article All Early Late
J. Friedman (2019) 54 12 42
Basu (2019a) 49 10 39
Correia and Skiles (2019) 42 8 34
Basu (2019b) 39 7 32
Dorst (2019) 39 10 29

Citation Rank

Table 129: Citation rank for widely cited articles from 2019.
Article Overall Early Late
J. Friedman (2019) 1 1 1
Basu (2019a) 2 2 2
Correia and Skiles (2019) 3 6 3
Basu (2019b) 4 9 4
Dorst (2019) 4 2 5

References

Adams, Fred, and Ken Aizawa. 2001. “The Bounds of Cognition.” Philosophical Psychology 14 (1): 43–64. doi: 10.1080/09515080120033571.
Adams, Robert Merrihew. 1976. “Motive Utilitarianism.” Journal of Philosophy 73 (14): 467–81. doi: 10.2307/2025783.
Alchourrón, Carlos E., Peter Gärdenfors, and David Makinson. 1985. “On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Contraction and Revision Functions.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (2): 510–30. doi: 10.2307/2274239.
Alston, William P. 1985. “Concepts of Epistemic Justification.” Monist 68 (1): 57–89. doi: 10.5840/monist198568116.
———. 1988. “An Internalist Externalism.” Synthese 74 (3): 265–83. doi: 10.1007/BF00869630.
Anderson, Elizabeth S. 1999. “What Is the Point of Equality?” Ethics 109 (2): 287–337. doi: 10.1086/233897.
———. 2012. “Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions.” Social Epistemology 26 (2): 163–73. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2011.652211.
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1958. “Modern Moral Philosophy.” Philosophy 33 (124): 1–19. doi: 10.1017/S0031819100037943.
Arneson, Richard J. 1989. “Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare.” Philosophical Studies 56 (1): 77–93. doi: 10.1007/BF00646210.
Audi, Paul. 2012. “Grounding: Toward a Theory of the In-Virtue-Of Relation.” Journal of Philosophy 109 (12): 685–711. doi: 10.5840/jphil20121091232.
Audi, Robert. 1994. “Dispositional Beliefs and Dispositions To Believe.” Noûs 28 (4): 419–34. doi: 10.2307/2215473.
———. 1997. “The Place of Testimony in the Fabric of Knowledge and Justification.” American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (4): 405–22.
Baier, Annette. 1986. “Trust and Antitrust.” Ethics 96 (2): 231–60. doi: 10.1086/292745.
Baker, Alan. 2005. “Are There Genuine Mathematical Explanations of Physical Phenomena?” Mind 114 (454): 223–38. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzi223.
———. 2009. “Mathematical Explanation in Science.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3): 611–33. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axp025.
Baker, Lynne Rudder. 1997. “Why Constitution Is Not Identity.” Journal of Philosophy 94 (12): 599–621. doi: 10.2307/2564596.
Barwise, Jon, and Robin Cooper. 1981. “Generalized Quantifiers and Natural-Language.” Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (2): 159–219. doi: 10.1007/BF00350139.
Basu, Rima. 2019a. “The Wrongs of Racist Beliefs.” Philosophical Studies 176 (9): 2497–2515. doi: 10.1007/s11098-018-1137-0.
———. 2019b. “What We Epistemically Owe To Each Other.” Philosophical Studies 176 (4): 915–31. doi: 10.1007/s11098-018-1219-z.
Batterman, Robert W., and Collin C. Rice. 2014. “Minimal Model Explanations.” Philosophy of Science 81 (3): 349–76. doi: 10.1086/676677.
Bayne, Tim. 2009. “Perception and the Reach of Phenomenal Content.” Philosophical Quarterly 59 (236): 385–404. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.631.x.
Bechtal, William, and Jennifer Mundale. 1999. “Multiple Realizability Revisited: Linking Cognitive and Neural States.” Philosophy of Science 66 (2): 175–207. doi: 10.1086/392683.
Benacerraf, Paul. 1965. “What Numbers Could Not Be.” Philosophical Review 74 (1): 47–73. doi: 10.2307/2183530.
———. 1973. “Mathematical Truth.” Journal of Philosophy 70 (19): 661–79.
Bengson, John. 2015. “The Intellectual Given.” Mind 124 (495): 707–60. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzv029.
Bennett, Karen. 2011. “By Our Bootstraps.” Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1): 27–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2011.00207.x.
Berker, Selim. 2013. “Epistemic Teleology and the Separateness of Propositions.” Philosophical Review 122 (3): 337–93. doi: 10.1215/00318108-2087645.
———. 2018. “The Unity of Grounding.” Mind 127 (507): 729–77. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzw069.
Bigelow, John, and Robert Pargetter. 1987. “Functions.” Journal of Philosophy 84 (4): 181–96. doi: 10.2307/2027157.
Bird, Alexander. 1998. “Dispositions and Antidotes.” Philosophical Quarterly 48 (191): 227–34. doi: 10.1111/1467-9213.00098.
Block, Ned, and Robert C. Stalnaker. 1999. “Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap.” Philosophical Review 108 (1): 1–46. doi: 10.2307/2998259.
Bogen, James, and James Woodward. 1988. “Saving the Phenomena.” Philosophical Review 97 (3): 303–52. doi: 10.2307/2185445.
Boghossian, Paul A. 1989. “The Rule-Following Considerations.” Mind 98 (392): 507–49.
———. 1996. “Analyticity Reconsidered.” Noûs 30 (3): 360–91. doi: 10.2307/2216275.
———. 2014. “What Is Inference?” Philosophical Studies 169 (1): 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s11098-012-9903-x.
Boghossian, Paul A., and J. David Velleman. 1989. “Color as a Secondary Quality.” Mind 98 (389): 81–103.
Bolinger, Renee Jorgensen. 2020. “The Rational Impermissibility of Accepting (Some) Racial Generalizations.” Synthese 197 (6): 2415–31. doi: 10.1007/s11229-018-1809-5.
BonJour, Laurence. 1978. “Can Empirical Knowledge Have a Foundation?” American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (1): 1–13.
Boolos, George. 1971. “The Iterative Conception of Set.” Journal of Philosophy 68 (8): 215–31.
———. 1984. “To Be Is To Be a Value of a Variable (Or To Be Some Values of Some Variables).” Journal of Philosophy 81 (8): 430–49. doi: 10.2307/2026308.
Boorse, Christopher. 1977. “Health as a Theoretical Concept.” Philosophy of Science 44 (4): 542–73. doi: 10.1086/288768.
Boyd, Richard. 1991. “Realism, Anti-Foundationalism and the Enthusiasm for Natural Kinds.” Philosophical Studies 61 (1-2): 127–48. doi: 10.1007/BF00385837.
Brandom, Robert. 1983. “Asserting.” Noûs 17 (4): 637–50. doi: 10.2307/2215086.
Brandt, Richard. 1972. “Rationality, Egoism, and Morality.” Journal of Philosophy 69 (20): 681–97.
Bratman, Michael E. 1992. “Shared Cooperative Activity.” Philosophical Review 101 (2): 327–40. doi: 10.2307/2185537.
———. 1993. “Shared Intention.” Ethics 104 (1): 97–113. doi: 10.1086/293577.
Braun, David. 1993. “Empty Names.” Noûs 27 (4): 449–69. doi: 10.2307/2215787.
Broome, John. 1999. “Normative Requirements.” Ratio 12 (4): 398–419. doi: 10.1111/1467-9329.00101.
Brown, Jessica. 2008. “Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and the Knowledge Norm for Practical Reasoning.” Noûs 42 (2): 167–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2008.00677.x.
Bruineberg, Jelle, Julian Kiverstein, and Erik Rietveld. 2018. “The Anticipating Brain Is Not a Scientist: The Free-Energy Principle From An Ecological-Enactive Perspective.” Synthese 195 (6): 2417–44. doi: 10.1007/s11229-016-1239-1.
Buchak, Lara. 2014. “Belief, Credence, and Norms.” Philosophical Studies 169 (2): 285–311. doi: 10.1007/s11098-013-0182-y.
Burge, Tyler. 1973. “Reference and Proper Names.” Journal of Philosophy 70 (14): 425–39.
———. 1974. “Demonstrative Constructions, Reference, and Truth.” Journal of Philosophy 71 (7): 205–23.
———. 1977. “Belief De Re.” Journal of Philosophy 74 (6): 338–62. doi: 10.2307/2025871.
———. 1986a. “Individualism and Psychology.” Philosophical Review 95 (1): 3–45. doi: 10.2307/2185131.
———. 1986b. “Intellectual Norms and Foundations of Mind.” Journal of Philosophy 83 (12): 697–720. doi: 10.2307/2026694.
———. 1988. “Individualism and Self-Knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 85 (11): 649–63. doi: 10.5840/jphil1988851112.
———. 1993. “Content Preservation.” Philosophical Review 102 (4): 457–88. doi: 10.2307/2185680.
———. 1997. “Interlocution, Perception, and Memory.” Philosophical Studies 86 (1): 21–47. doi: 10.1023/A:1004261628340.
———. 2003. “Perceptual Entitlement.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3): 503–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00307.x.
Burke, Michael B. 1992. “Copper Statues and Pieces of Copper: A Challenge To the Standard Account.” Analysis 52 (1): 12–17. doi: 10.2307/3328875.
Byrne, Alex. 2001. “Intentionalism Defended.” Philosophical Review 110 (2): 199–240. doi: 10.1215/00318108-110-2-199.
———. 2009. “Experience and Content.” Philosophical Quarterly 59 (236): 429–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.614.x.
Cartwright, Nancy. 1979. “Causal Laws and Effective Strategies.” Noûs 13 (4): 419–37. doi: 10.2307/2215337.
Castañeda, Hector-Neri. 1967. “Indicators and Quasi-Indicators.” American Philosophical Quarterly 4 (2): 85–100.
———. 1977. “Perception, Belief, and Structure of Physical Objects and Consciousness.” Synthese 35 (3): 285–351. doi: 10.1007/BF00485549.
Causey, Robert L. 1972. “Attribute-Identities in Microreductions.” Journal of Philosophy 69 (14): 407–22.
Chalmers, David J. 2004. “Epistemic Two-Dimensional Semantics.” Philosophical Studies 118 (1-2): 153–226. doi: 10.1023/B:PHIL.0000019546.17135.e0.
———. 2011. “Verbal Disputes.” Philosophical Review 120 (4): 515–66. doi: 10.1215/00318108-1334478.
———. 2018. “The Meta-Problem of Consciousness.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 25 (9-10): 6–61.
Chalmers, David J., and Frank Jackson. 2001. “Conceptual Analysis and Reductive Explanation.” Philosophical Review 110 (3): 315–60. doi: 10.2307/2693648.
Chang, Ruth. 2002. “The Possibility of Parity.” Ethics 112 (4): 659–88. doi: 10.1086/339673.
Chisholm, Roderick M., and Ernest Sosa. 1966. “Logic of Intrinsically Better.” American Philosophical Quarterly 3 (3): 244–49.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. “Language and Nature.” Mind 104 (413): 1–61. doi: 10.1093/mind/104.413.1.
Christensen, David. 2007. “Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News.” Philosophical Review 116 (2): 187–217. doi: 10.1215/00318108-2006-035.
———. 2010. “Higher-Order Evidence.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (1): 185–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00366.x.
———. 2011. “Disagreement, Question-Begging and Epistemic Self-Criticism.” Philosophers’ Imprint 11 (6): 1–22.
Churchland, Paul M. 1981. “Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes.” Journal of Philosophy 78 (2): 67–90. doi: 10.2307/2025900.
———. 1985. “Reduction, Qualia, and the Direct Introspection of Brain States.” Journal of Philosophy 82 (1): 8–28. doi: 10.2307/2026509.
Clark, Andy, and David J. Chalmers. 1998. “The Extended Mind.” Analysis 58 (1): 7–19. doi: 10.1111/1467-8284.00096.
Clarke, Thompson. 1972. “The Legacy of Skepticism.” Journal of Philosophy 69 (20): 754–69.
Cobreros, Pablo, Paul Egre, David Ripley, and Robert Van Rooij. 2012. “Tolerant, Classical, Strict.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2): 347–85. doi: 10.1007/s10992-010-9165-z.
———. 2013. “Reaching Transparent Truth.” Mind 122 (488): 841–66. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzt110.
Cohen, G. A. 1989. “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice.” Ethics 99 (4): 906–44. doi: 10.1086/293126.
Cohen, Jonathan, and Craig Callender. 2009. “A Better Best System Account of Lawhood.” Philosophical Studies 145 (1): 1–34. doi: 10.1007/s11098-009-9389-3.
Cohen, Stewart. 1984. “Justification and Truth.” Philosophical Studies 46 (3): 279–95. doi: 10.1007/BF00372907.
———. 2002. “Basic Knowledge and the Problem of Easy Knowledge.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2): 309–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00204.x.
Conee, Earl, and Richard Feldman. 1998. “The Generality Problem for Reliabilism.” Philosophical Studies 89 (1): 1–29. doi: 10.1023/A:1004243308503.
Correia, Fabrice, and Alexander Skiles. 2019. “Grounding, Essence, and Identity.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98 (3): 642–70. doi: 10.1111/phpr.12468.
Crane, Tim, and D. H. Mellor. 1990. “There Is No Question of Physicalism.” Mind 99 (394): 185–206.
Craver, Carl F. 2001. “Role Functions, Mechanisms, and Hierarchy.” Philosophy of Science 68 (1): 53–74. doi: 10.1086/392866.
———. 2006. “When Mechanistic Models Explain.” Synthese 153 (3): 355–76. doi: 10.1007/s11229-006-9097-x.
Crimmins, Mark, and John Perry. 1989. “The Prince and the Phone Booth: Reporting Puzzling Beliefs.” Journal of Philosophy 86 (12): 685–711. doi: 10.2307/2027014.
Cummins, Robert. 1975. “Functional Analysis.” Journal of Philosophy 72 (20): 741–65. doi: 10.2307/2024640.
D’Arms, Justin, and Dan Jacobson. 2000. “The Moralistic Fallacy: On the ‘Appropriateness’ of Emotions.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1): 65–90. doi: 10.2307/2653403.
Daniels, Norman. 1979. “Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics.” Journal of Philosophy 76 (5): 256–82. doi: 10.2307/2025881.
———. 1980. “Reflective Equilibrium and Archimedean Points.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (1): 83–103.
Danto, Arthur. 1964. “The Artworld.” Journal of Philosophy 61 (19): 571–84. doi: 10.2307/2022937.
Darwall, Stephen L. 1977. “Two Kinds of Respect.” Ethics 88 (1): 36–49. doi: 10.1086/292054.
Dasgupta, Shamik. 2014. “The Possibility of Physicalism.” Journal of Philosophy 111 (9-10): 557–92. doi: 10.5840/jphil20141119/1037.
———. 2016. “Metaphysical Rationalism.” Noûs 50 (2): 379–418. doi: 10.1111/nous.12082.
Davidson, Donald. 1967a. “Causal Relations.” Journal of Philosophy 64 (21): 691–703. doi: 10.2307/2023853.
———. 1967b. “Truth and Meaning.” Synthese 17 (3): 304–23. doi: 10.1007/BF00485035.
———. 1990. “The Structure and Content of Truth.” Journal of Philosophy 87 (6): 279–328. doi: 10.2307/2026863.
———. 1996. “The Folly of Trying To Define Truth.” Journal of Philosophy 93 (6): 263–78. doi: 10.2307/2941075.
Davies, Martin, and Lloyd Humberstone. 1980. “Two Notions of Necessity.” Philosophical Studies 38 (1): 1–30. doi: 10.1007/BF00354523.
Dennett, Daniel C. 1971. “Intentional Systems.” Journal of Philosophy 68 (4): 87–106.
———. 1991. “Real Patterns.” Journal of Philosophy 88 (1): 27–51. doi: 10.2307/2027085.
DeRose, Keith. 1992. “Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (4): 913–29. doi: 10.2307/2107917.
———. 1995. “Solving the Skeptical Problem.” Philosophical Review 104 (1): 1–52. doi: 10.2307/2186011.
———. 2003. “Assertion, Knowledge, and Context.” Philosophical Review 111 (2): 167–203.
deRosset, Louis. 2013. “Grounding Explanations.” Philosophers’ Imprint 13 (7): 1–26.
Devitt, Michael. 1974. “Singular Terms.” Journal of Philosophy 71 (7): 183–205.
Dickie, George. 1964. “The Myth of the Aesthetic Attitude.” American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (1): 56–65.
Donnellan, Keith S. 1966. “Reference and Definite Descriptions.” Philosophical Review 75 (3): 281–304. doi: 10.2307/2183143.
Dorr, Cian. 2016. “To Be F Is To Be G.” Philosophical Perspectives 30 (1): 39–134. doi: 10.1111/phpe.12079.
Dorst, Kevin. 2019. “Lockeans Maximize Expected Accuracy.” Mind 128 (509): 175–211. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzx028.
Dotson, Kristie. 2011. “Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing.” Hypatia 26 (2): 236–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01177.x.
Douglas, Heather. 2000. “Inductive Risk and Values in Science.” Philosophy of Science 67 (4): 559–79. doi: 10.1086/392855.
Douven, Igor. 2006. “Assertion, Knowledge, and Rational Credibility.” Philosophical Review 115 (4): 449–85. doi: 10.1215/00318108-2006-010.
Dreier, Jamie. 1990. “Internalism and Speaker Relativism.” Ethics 101 (1): 6–26. doi: 10.1086/293257.
Dretske, Fred. 1970. “Epistemic Operators.” Journal of Philosophy 67 (24): 1007–23. doi: 10.2307/2024710.
———. 1977. “Laws of Nature.” Philosophy of Science 44 (2): 248–68. doi: 10.1086/288741.
———. 1993. “Conscious Experience.” Mind 102 (406): 263–83. doi: 10.1093/mind/102.406.263.
Dummett, Michael. 1959. “Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Mathematics.” Philosophical Review 68 (3): 324–48. doi: 10.2307/2182566.
———. 1964. “Bringing About the Past.” Philosophical Review 73 (3): 338–59. doi: 10.2307/2183661.
Dunn, J. Michael. 1976. “Intuitive Semantics for First-Degree Entailments and Coupled Trees.” Philosophical Studies 29 (3): 149–68. doi: 10.1007/BF00373152.
Dupré, John. 1981. “Natural Kinds and Biological Taxa.” Philosophical Review 90 (1): 66–90. doi: 10.2307/2184373.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1981a. “What Is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 10 (3): 185–246.
———. 1981b. “What Is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 10 (4): 283–345.
———. 1996. “Objectivity and Truth: You’d Better Believe It.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 25 (2): 87–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1996.tb00036.x.
Earman, John, and John Norton. 1987. “What Price Spacetime Substantivalism: The Hole Story.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (4): 515–25. doi: 10.1093/bjps/38.4.515.
Edgington, Dorothy. 1995. “On Conditionals.” Mind 104 (414): 235–329. doi: 10.1093/mind/104.414.235.
Eells, Ellery, and Elliot Sober. 1983. “Probabilistic Causality and the Question of Transitivity.” Philosophy of Science 50 (1): 35–57. doi: 10.1086/289089.
Egan, Andy. 2007. “Epistemic Modals, Relativism and Assertion.” Philosophical Studies 133 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.1007/s11098-006-9003-x.
Elga, Adam. 2000. “Self-Locating Belief and the ‘Sleeping Beauty’ Problem.” Analysis 60 (2): 143–47. doi: 10.1111/1467-8284.00215.
———. 2007. “Reflection and Disagreement.” Noûs 41 (3): 478–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00656.x.
Enoch, David. 2006. “Agency, Shmagency: Why Normativity Won’t Come From What Is Constitutive of Action.” Philosophical Review 115 (2): 169–98. doi: 10.1215/00318108-115-2-169.
Fantl, Jeremy, and Matthew McGrath. 2002. “Evidence, Pragmatics, and Justification.” Philosophical Review 111 (1): 67–94. doi: 10.1215/00318108-111-1-67.
Fara, Michael. 2008. “Masked Abilities and Compatibilism.” Mind 117 (468): 843–65. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzn078.
Feinberg, Joel. 1965. “The Expressive Function of Punishment.” Monist 49 (3): 397–423. doi: 10.5840/monist196549326.
Feldman, Richard. 1985. “Reliability and Justification.” Monist 68 (2): 159–74. doi: 10.5840/monist198568226.
Feldman, Richard, and Earl Conee. 1985. “Evidentialism.” Philosophical Studies 48 (1): 15–34. doi: 10.1007/BF00372404.
Field, Hartry. 1972. “Tarski’s Theory of Truth.” Journal of Philosophy 69 (13): 347–75.
———. 1973. “Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference.” Journal of Philosophy 70 (14): 462–81.
———. 1977. “Logic, Meaning, and Conceptual Role.” Journal of Philosophy 74 (7): 379–409.
———. 1994. “Deflationist Views of Meaning and Content.” Mind 103 (411): 249–85. doi: 10.1093/mind/103.411.249.
Fine, Kit. 1995. “The Logic of Essence.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (3): 241–73. doi: 10.1007/BF01344203.
———. 2003. “The Non-Identity of a Material Thing and Its Matter.” Mind 112 (446): 195–234. doi: 10.1093/mind/112.446.195.
———. 2015. “Unified Foundations for Essence and Ground.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1 (2): 296–311. doi: 10.1017/apa.2014.26.
———. 2017. “A Theory of Truthmaker Content I: Conjunction, Disjunction and Negation.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 46 (6): 625–74. doi: 10.1007/s10992-016-9413-y.
Fitelson, Brandon. 1999. “The Plurality of Bayesian Measures of Confirmation and the Problem of Measure Sensitivity.” Philosophy of Science 66 (3): S362–78. doi: 10.1086/392738.
Fodor, Jerry A. 1984. “Observation Reconsidered.” Philosophy of Science 51 (1): 23–43. doi: 10.1086/289162.
———. 1991. “A Modal Argument for Narrow Content.” Journal of Philosophy 88 (1): 5–26. doi: 10.2307/2027084.
Foley, Richard. 1992. “The Epistemology of Belief and the Epistemology of Degrees of Belief.” American Philosophical Quarterly 29 (2): 111–24.
Foot, Philippa. 1972. “Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives.” Philosophical Review 81 (3): 305–16. doi: 10.2307/2184328.
Forbes, Graeme. 1990. “The Indispensability of Sinn.” Philosophical Review 99 (4): 535–63. doi: 10.2307/2185616.
Forster, Malcom, and Elliot Sober. 1994. “How To Tell When Simpler, More Unified, or Less Ad Hoc Theories Will Provide More Accurate Predictions.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1): 1–35. doi: 10.1093/bjps/45.1.1.
van Fraassen, Bas C. 1966. “Singular Terms, Truth-Value Gaps, and Free Logic.” Journal of Philosophy 63 (17): 481–95. doi: 10.2307/2024549.
———. 1968. “Presupposition, Implication, and Self-Reference.” Journal of Philosophy 65 (5): 136–51. doi: 10.2307/2024557.
———. 1969. “Facts and Tautological Entailments.” Journal of Philosophy 66 (15): 477–87. doi: 10.2307/2024563.
———. 1970. “On Extension of Beths Semantics of Physical Theories.” Philosophy of Science 37 (3): 325–25 &. doi: 10.1086/288311.
———. 1973. “Values and the Heart’s Command.” Journal of Philosophy 70 (1): 5–19.
———. 1984. “Belief and the Will.” Journal of Philosophy 81 (5): 235–56.
Frankfurt, Harry G. 1969. “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.” Journal of Philosophy 66 (23): 829–39. doi: 10.2307/2023833.
———. 1971. “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.” Journal of Philosophy 68 (1): 5–20.
———. 1978. “The Problem of Action.” American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (2): 157–62.
———. 1982. “The Importance of What We Care About.” Synthese 53 (2): 257–72. doi: 10.1007/BF00484902.
———. 1987. “Equality as a Moral Ideal.” Ethics 98 (1): 21–43. doi: 10.1086/292913.
Frege, Gottlob. 1956. “The Thought: A Logical Inquiry.” Mind 65 (259): 289–311. doi: 10.1093/mind/65.1.289.
Fricker, Miranda. 2016. “What’s the Point of Blame? A Paradigm Based Explanation.” Noûs 50 (1): 165–83. doi: 10.1111/nous.12067.
Friedman, Jane. 2013. “Suspended Judgment.” Philosophical Studies 162 (2): 165–81. doi: 10.1007/s11098-011-9753-y.
———. 2017. “Why Suspend Judging?” Noûs 51 (2): 302–26. doi: 10.1111/nous.12137.
———. 2019. “Inquiry and Belief.” Noûs 53 (2): 296–315. doi: 10.1111/nous.12222.
Friedman, Michael. 1974. “Explanation and Scientific Understanding.” Journal of Philosophy 71 (1): 5–19.
Geach, Peter T. 1960. “Ascriptivism.” Philosophical Review 69 (2): 221–25. doi: 10.2307/2183506.
———. 1965. “Assertion.” Philosophical Review 74 (4): 449–65. doi: 10.2307/2183123.
van Gelder, Tim. 1995. “What Might Cognition Be, If Not Computation.” Journal of Philosophy 92 (7): 345–81. doi: 10.2307/2941061.
Gendler, Tamar Szabò. 2008. “Alief and Belief.” Journal of Philosophy 105 (10): 634–63. doi: 10.5840/jphil20081051025.
Gibbard, Allan. 1975. “Contingent Identity.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 4 (2): 187–221. doi: 10.1007/BF00693273.
Giere, Ronald N. 2004. “How Models Are Used To Represent Reality.” Philosophy of Science 71 (5): 742–52. doi: 10.1086/425063.
Gilbert, Margaret. 1987. “Modeling Collective Belief.” Synthese 73 (1): 185–204. doi: 10.1007/BF00485446.
Giubilini, Alberto, and Francesca Minerva. 2013. “After-Birth Abortion: Why Should the Baby Live?” Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5): 261–63. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100411.
Glennan, Stuart. 2002. “Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 69 (3): S342–53. doi: 10.1086/341857.
Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 1994. “A Modern History Theory of Functions.” Noûs 28 (3): 344–62. doi: 10.2307/2216063.
———. 2006. “The Strategy of Model-Based Science.” Biology and Philosophy 21 (5): 725–40. doi: 10.1007/s10539-006-9054-6.
Goguen, J. A. 1969. “The Logic of Inexact Concepts.” Synthese 19 (3-4): 325–73. doi: 10.1007/BF00485654.
Goldman, Alvin I. 1967. “A Causal Theory of Knowing.” Journal of Philosophy 64 (12): 357–72. doi: 10.2307/2024268.
———. 1971. “The Individuation of Action.” Journal of Philosophy 68 (21): 761–74.
———. 1976. “Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 73 (20): 771–91. doi: 10.2307/2025679.
———. 2001. “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1): 85–110. doi: 10.2307/3071090.
Good, I. J. 1961. “A Causal Calculus (I).” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11 (44): 305–18.
Grandy, Richard. 1973. “Reference, Meaning, and Belief.” Journal of Philosophy 70 (14): 439–52.
Greaves, Hilary, and David Wallace. 2006. “Justifying Conditionalization: Conditionalization Maximizes Expected Epistemic Utility.” Mind 115 (459): 607–32. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzl607.
Grice, H. P. 1957. “Meaning.” Philosophical Review 66 (3): 377–88. doi: 10.2307/2182440.
———. 1969. “Utterer’s Meaning and Intentions.” Philosophical Review 78 (2): 147–77. doi: 10.2307/2184179.
Grice, H. P., and P. F. Strawson. 1956. “In Defense of a Dogma.” Philosophical Review 65 (2): 141–58. doi: 10.2307/2182828.
Griffiths, Paul E. 1993. “Functional Analysis and Proper Functions.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (3): 409–22. doi: 10.1093/bjps/44.3.409.
Griffiths, Paul E., and R. D. Gray. 1994. “Developmental Systems and Evolutionary Explanation.” Journal of Philosophy 91 (6): 277–304. doi: 10.2307/2940982.
Groenendijk, Jeroen, and Martin Stokhof. 1991. “Dynamic Predicate Logic.” Linguistics and Philosophy 14 (1): 39–100. doi: 10.1007/BF00628304.
Grove, Adam. 1988. “Two Modelings for Theory Change.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 17 (2): 157–70.
Grover, Dorothy L., Joseph L. Camp Jr., and Nuel D. Belnap Jr. 1975. “A Pro-Sentential Theory of Truth.” Philosophical Studies 27 (2): 73–125. doi: 10.1007/BF01209340.
Gupta, Anil. 1982. “Truth and Paradox.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (1): 1–60. doi: 10.1007/BF00302338.
Hacking, Ian. 1967a. “Possibility.” Philosophical Review 76 (2): 143–68. doi: 10.2307/2183640.
———. 1967b. “Slightly More Realistic Personal Probability.” Philosophy of Science 34 (4): 311–25. doi: 10.1086/288169.
Hájek, Alan. 2003. “What Conditional Probability Could Not Be.” Synthese 137 (3): 273–323. doi: 10.1023/B:SYNT.0000004904.91112.16.
Hampshire, Stuart, and H. L. A. Hart. 1958. “Decision, Intention and Certainty.” Mind 67 (265): 1–12.
Hardwig, John. 1985. “Epistemic Dependence.” Journal of Philosophy 82 (7): 335–49. doi: 10.2307/2026523.
———. 1991. “The Role of Trust in Knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 88 (12): 693–708. doi: 10.2307/2027007.
Harman, Gilbert. 1965. “The Inference To the Best Explanation.” Philosophical Review 74 (1): 88–95. doi: 10.2307/2183532.
———. 1968. “Knowledge, Inference, and Explanation.” American Philosophical Quarterly 5 (3): 164–73.
———. 1975. “Moral Relativism Defended.” Philosophical Review 84 (1): 3–22. doi: 10.2307/2184078.
———. 1976. “Practical Reasoning.” Review of Metaphysics 29 (3): 431–63.
Haslanger, Sally. 2000. “Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them To Be?” Noûs 34 (1): 31–55. doi: 10.1111/0029-4624.00201.
Hawthorne, John, Daniel Rothschild, and Levi Spectre. 2016. “Belief Is Weak.” Philosophical Studies 173 (5): 1393–1404. doi: 10.1007/s11098-015-0553-7.
Hawthorne, John, and Jason Stanley. 2008. “Knowledge and Action.” Journal of Philosophy 105 (10): 571–90. doi: 10.5840/jphil20081051022.
Hellman, Geoffrey Paul, and Frank Wilson Thompson. 1975. “Physicalism: Ontology, Determination, and Reduction.” Journal of Philosophy 72 (17): 551–64. doi: 10.2307/2025067.
Hieronymi, Pamela. 2005. “The Wrong Kind of Reason.” Journal of Philosophy 102 (9): 437–57. doi: 10.5840/jphil2005102933.
———. 2008. “Responsibility for Believing.” Synthese 161 (3): 357–73. doi: 10.1007/s11229-006-9089-x.
Hill, Christopher S. 1997. “Imaginability, Conceivability, Possibility and the Mind-Body Problem.” Philosophical Studies 87 (1): 61–85. doi: 10.1023/A:1017911200883.
Hills, Alison. 2009. “Moral Testimony and Moral Epistemology.” Ethics 120 (1): 94–127. doi: 10.1086/648610.
———. 2016. “Understanding Why.” Noûs 50 (4): 661–88. doi: 10.1111/nous.12092.
Hintikka, Jaako. 1962. “Cogito, Ergo Sum: Inference or Performance?” Philosophical Review 71 (1): 3–32. doi: 10.2307/2183678.
Hitchcock, Christopher. 2001. “The Intransitivity of Causation Revealed in Equations and Graphs.” Journal of Philosophy 98 (6): 273–99. doi: 10.2307/2678432.
Hjortland, Ole Thomassen. 2017. “Anti-Exceptionalism About Logic.” Philosophical Studies 174 (3): 631–58. doi: 10.1007/s11098-016-0701-8.
Hohwy, Jakob. 2016. “The Self-Evidencing Brain.” Noûs 50 (2): 259–85. doi: 10.1111/nous.12062.
Holton, Richard. 1994. “Deciding To Trust, Coming To Believe.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (1): 63–76. doi: 10.1080/00048409412345881.
Horgan, Terrence. 1993. “From Supervenience To Superdupervenience: Meeting the Demands of a Material World.” Mind 102 (408): 554–86.
Horowitz, Sophie. 2014. “Epistemic Akrasia.” Noûs 48 (4): 718–44. doi: 10.1111/nous.12026.
Huemer, Michael. 2007. “Compassionate Phenomenal Conservatism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1): 30–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00002.x.
Hull, David L. 1965. “The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy: 2000 Years of Stasis (I).” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15 (60): 314–26.
———. 1978. “A Matter of Individuality.” Philosophy of Science 45 (3): 335–60. doi: 10.1086/288811.
Hyman, John. 1999. “How Knowledge Works.” Philosophical Quarterly 49 (197): 433–51. doi: 10.1111/1467-9213.00152.
van Inwagen, Peter. 1981. “The Doctrine of Arbitrary Undetached Parts.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62 (2): 123–37.
Jackson, Frank. 1982. “Epiphenomenal Qualia.” Philosophical Quarterly 32 (127): 127–36. doi: 10.2307/2960077.
———. 1991. “Decision-Theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest Objection.” Ethics 101 (3): 461–82. doi: 10.1086/293312.
Jackson, Frank, and Robert Pargetter. 1986. “Oughts, Options, and Actualism.” Philosophical Review 95 (2): 233–55. doi: 10.2307/2185591.
Jackson, Frank, and Philip Pettit. 1988. “Functionalism and Broad Content.” Mind 97 (387): 381–400.
———. 1990. “Program Explanation: A General Perspective.” Analysis 50 (2): 107–17. doi: 10.2307/3328853.
Jeffrey, Richard C. 1974. “Preference Among Preferences.” Journal of Philosophy 71 (13): 377–91.
Jenkins, C. S. 2011. “Is Metaphysical Dependence Irreflexive?” Monist 94 (2): 267–76. doi: 10.5840/monist201194213.
Johnston, Mark. 1992. “How To Speak of the Colors.” Philosophical Studies 68 (3): 221–63. doi: 10.1007/BF00694847.
———. 2004. “The Obscure Object of Hallucination.” Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3): 113–83. doi: 10.1023/B:PHIL.0000033753.64202.21.
Jones, Karen. 1996. “Trust as An Affective Attitude.” Ethics 107 (1): 4–25. doi: 10.1086/233694.
Joyce, James M. 1998. “A Nonpragmatic Vindication of Probabilism.” Philosophy of Science 65 (4): 575–603. doi: 10.1086/392661.
Kagan, Shelley. 1988. “The Additive Fallacy.” Ethics 99 (1): 5–31. doi: 10.1086/293033.
Kaplan, David. 1975. “Sets, Concepts and Extensions: How To Russell a Frege-Church.” Journal of Philosophy 72 (19): 716–29. doi: 10.2307/2024635.
Kaplan, David Michael, and Carl F. Craver. 2011. “The Explanatory Force of Dynamical and Mathematical Models in Neuroscience: A Mechanistic Perspective.” Philosophy of Science 78 (4): 601–27. doi: 10.1086/661755.
Kavka, Gregory S. 1978. “Some Paradoxes of Deterrence.” Journal of Philosophy 75 (6): 285–302. doi: 10.2307/2025707.
———. 1983. “The Toxin Puzzle.” Analysis 43 (1): 33–36. doi: 10.2307/3327802.
Kelly, Thomas. 2003. “Epistemic Rationality as Instrumental Rationality: A Critique.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3): 612–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00281.x.
Kemeny, John G., and Paul Oppenheim. 1956. “On Reduction.” Philosophical Studies 7 (1-2): 6–19. doi: 10.1007/BF02333288.
Kim, Jaegwon. 1966. “On the Psycho-Physical Identity Theory.” American Philosophical Quarterly 3 (3): 227–35.
———. 1973. “Causation, Nomic Subsumption, and the Concept of Event.” Journal of Philosophy 70 (8): 217–36.
———. 1978. “Supervenience and Nomological Incommensurables.” American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (2): 149–56.
———. 1982. “Psychophysical Supervenience.” Philosophical Studies 41 (1): 51–70. doi: 10.1007/BF00353523.
———. 1984. “Concepts of Supervenience.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (2): 153–76. doi: 10.2307/2107423.
———. 1990. “Supervenience as a Philosophical Concept.” Metaphilosophy 21 (1-2): 1–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.1990.tb00830.x.
———. 1992. “Multiple Realization and the Metaphysics of Reduction.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (1): 1–26. doi: 10.2307/2107741.
———. 1999. “Making Sense of Emergence.” Philosophical Studies 95 (1-2): 3–36. doi: 10.1023/A:1004563122154.
Kitcher, Philip. 1981. “Explanatory Unification.” Philosophy of Science 48 (4): 507–31. doi: 10.1086/289019.
———. 1984. “Species.” Philosophy of Science 51 (2): 308–33. doi: 10.1086/289182.
———. 1990. “The Division of Cognitive Labor.” Journal of Philosophy 87 (1): 5–22. doi: 10.2307/2026796.
———. 1992. “The Naturalists Return.” Philosophical Review 101 (1): 53–114. doi: 10.2307/2185044.
Klein, Peter D. 1971. “A Proposed Definition of Propositional Knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 68 (16): 471–82.
Knobe, Joshua. 2003. “Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language.” Analysis 63 (3): 190–94. doi: 10.1111/1467-8284.00419.
———. 2006. “The Concept of Intentional Action: A Case Study in the Uses of Folk Psychology.” Philosophical Studies 130 (2): 203–31. doi: 10.1007/s11098-004-4510-0.
Kolodny, Niko. 2005. “Why Be Rational?” Mind 114 (455): 509–63. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzi509.
Kolodny, Niko, and John MacFarlane. 2010. “Ifs and Oughts.” Journal of Philosophy 107 (3): 115–43. doi: 10.5840/jphil2010107310.
Kornblith, Hilary. 1983. “Justified Belief and Epistemically Responsible Action.” Philosophical Review 92 (1): 33–48. doi: 10.2307/2184520.
Korsgaard, Christine M. 1983. “Two Distinctions in Goodness.” Philosophical Review 92 (2): 169–95. doi: 10.2307/2184924.
———. 1986. “Skepticism About Practical Reason.” Journal of Philosophy 83 (1): 5–25. doi: 10.2307/2026464.
Kripke, Saul. 1975. “Outline of a Theory of Truth.” Journal of Philosophy 72 (19): 690–716. doi: 10.2307/2024634.
Lackey, Jennifer. 2007. “Norms of Assertion.” Noûs 41 (4): 594–626. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00664.x.
Ladyman, James. 1998. “What Is Structural Realism?” Studies In History And Philosophy of Science 29A (3): 409–24. doi: 10.1016/S0039-3681(98)80129-5.
Lange, Marc. 2013. “What Makes a Scientific Explanation Distinctively Mathematical?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (3): 485–511. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axs012.
Langton, Rae. 1993. “Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 22 (4): 293–330.
Langton, Rae, and David Lewis. 1998. “Defining ‘Intrinsic’.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (2): 333–45. doi: 10.2307/2653512.
Lascar, Daniel, and Bruno Poizat. 1979. “Introduction To Forking.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 44 (3): 330–50. doi: 10.2307/2273127.
Lasersohn, Peter. 2005. “Context Dependence, Disagreement, and Predicates of Personal Taste.” Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (6): 643–86. doi: 10.1007/s10988-005-0596-x.
Laudan, Larry. 1981. “A Confutation of Convergent Realism.” Philosophy of Science 48 (1): 19–49. doi: 10.1086/288975.
———. 1987. “Progress or Rationality: The Prospects for Normative Naturalism.” American Philosophical Quarterly 24 (1): 19–31.
Lehrer, Keith. 1971. “How Reasons Give Us Knowledge, or the Case of the Gypsy Lawyer.” Journal of Philosophy 68 (10): 311–13.
Lehrer, Keith, and Thomas Paxson Jr. 1969. “Knowledge: Undefeated Justified True Belief.” Journal of Philosophy 66 (8): 225–37. doi: 10.2307/2024435.
Lemmon, E. J. 1962. “Moral Dilemmas.” Philosophical Review 71 (2): 139–58. doi: 10.2307/2182983.
Leuenberger, Stephan. 2014. “Grounding and Necessity.” Inquiry 57 (2): 151–74. doi: 10.1080/0020174X.2013.855654.
Levi, Isaac. 1974. “On Indeterminate Probabilities.” Journal of Philosophy 71 (13): 391–418.
Levine, Joseph. 1983. “Materialism and Qualia: The Explanatory Gap.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64 (4): 354–61.
Levinson, Jerrold. 1980. “What a Musical Work Is.” Journal of Philosophy 77 (1): 5–28. doi: 10.2307/2025596.
Levy, Neil. 2015. “Neither Fish Nor Fowl: Implicit Attitudes as Patchy Endorsements.” Noûs 49 (4): 800–823. doi: 10.1111/nous.12074.
Lewis, David. 1966. “An Argument for the Identity Theory.” Journal of Philosophy 63 (1): 17–25. doi: 10.2307/2024524.
———. 1968. “Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic.” Journal of Philosophy 65 (5): 113–26. doi: 10.2307/2024555.
———. 1970. “How To Define Theoretical Terms.” Journal of Philosophy 67 (13): 427–46. doi: 10.2307/2023861.
———. 1971. “Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies.” Journal of Philosophy 68 (7): 203–11.
———. 1973. “Causation.” Journal of Philosophy 70 (17): 556–67.
———. 1976a. “Paradoxes of Time Travel.” American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (2): 145–52.
———. 1976b. “Probabilities of Conditionals and Conditional Probabilities.” Philosophical Review 85 (3): 297–315. doi: 10.2307/2184045.
———. 1978. “Truth in Fiction.” American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (1): 37–46.
———. 1979a. “Attitudes De Dicto and De Se.” Philosophical Review 88 (4): 513–43. doi: 10.2307/2184843.
———. 1979b. “Counterfactual Dependence and Time’s Arrow.” Noûs 13 (4): 455–76. doi: 10.2307/2215339.
———. 1979c. “Scorekeeping in a Language Game.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (3): 339–59.
———. 1980. “Veridical Hallucination and Prosthetic Vision.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (3): 239–49. doi: 10.1080/00048408012341251.
———. 1981. “Causal Decision Theory.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (1): 5–30. doi: 10.1080/00048408112340011.
———. 1982. “Logic for Equivocators.” Noûs 16 (3): 431–41. doi: 10.2307/2216219.
———. 1983. “New Work for a Theory of Universals.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4): 343–77. doi: 10.1080/00048408312341131.
———. 1984. “Putnam’s Paradox.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (3): 221–36. doi: 10.1080/00048408412340013.
———. 1988. “Desire as Belief.” Mind 97 (387): 323–32.
———. 1994. “Humean Supervenience Debugged.” Mind 103 (412): 473–90. doi: 10.1093/mind/103.412.473.
———. 1996. “Elusive Knowledge.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (4): 549–67. doi: 10.1080/00048409612347521.
———. 1997. “Finkish Dispositions.” Philosophical Quarterly 47 (187): 143–58. doi: 10.1111/1467-9213.00052.
———. 2000. “Causation as Influence.” Journal of Philosophy 97 (4): 182–97. doi: 10.2307/2678389.
List, Christian, and Philip Pettit. 2002. “Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result.” Economics and Philosophy 18 (1): 89–110. doi: 10.1017/S0266267102001098.
Loar, Brian. 1976. “The Semantics of Singular Terms.” Philosophical Studies 30 (6): 353–77. doi: 10.1007/BF00372537.
Loeb, Louis E. 1974. “Causal Theories and Causal Overdetermination.” Journal of Philosophy 71 (15): 525–44.
Loewer, Barry. 2012. “Two Accounts of Laws and Time.” Philosophical Studies 160 (1): 115–37. doi: 10.1007/s11098-012-9911-x.
Lucas, J. R. 1961. “Minds, Machines and Gödel.” Philosophy 36 (137): 112–27. doi: 10.1017/S0031819100057983.
MacFarlane, John. 2003. “Future Contingents and Relative Truth.” Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212): 321–36. doi: 10.1111/1467-9213.00315.
———. 2007. “Relativism and Disagreement.” Philosophical Studies 132 (1): 17–31. doi: 10.1007/s11098-006-9049-9.
———. 2009. “Nonindexical Contextualism.” Synthese 166 (2): 231–50. doi: 10.1007/s11229-007-9286-2.
Machamer, Peter, Lindley Darden, and Carl F. Craver. 2000. “Thinking About Mechanisms.” Philosophy of Science 67 (1): 1–25. doi: 10.1086/392759.
Mackie, J. L. 1965. “Causes and Conditions.” American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (4): 245–64.
Macpherson, Fiona. 2012. “Cognitive Penetration of Colour Experience: Rethinking the Issue in Light of An Indirect Mechanism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (1): 24–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00481.x.
Malcolm, Norman. 1960. “Anselm’s Ontological Arguments.” Philosophical Review 69 (1): 41–62. doi: 10.2307/2182266.
Mandelbaum, Eric. 2016. “Attitude, Inference, Association: On the Propositional Structure of Implicit Bias.” Noûs 50 (3): 629–58. doi: 10.1111/nous.12089.
Manley, David, and Ryan Wasserman. 2008. “On Linking Dispositions and Conditionals.” Mind 117 (465): 59–84. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzn003.
Marcus, Ruth Barcan. 1980. “Moral Dilemmas and Consistency.” Journal of Philosophy 77 (3): 121–36. doi: 10.2307/2025665.
Markovits, Julia. 2010. “Acting for the Right Reasons.” Philosophical Review 119 (2): 201–42. doi: 10.1215/00318108-2009-037.
Marquis, Don. 1989. “Why Abortion Is Immoral.” Journal of Philosophy 86 (4): 183–202. doi: 10.2307/2026961.
Martin, C. B. 1994. “Dispositions and Conditionals.” Philosophical Quarterly 44 (174): 1–8. doi: 10.2307/2220143.
Martin, C. B., and Max Deutscher. 1966. “Remembering.” Philosophical Review 75 (2): 161–96. doi: 10.2307/2183082.
Martin, Michael G. F. 2002. “The Transparency of Experience.” Mind and Language 17 (4): 376–425. doi: 10.1111/1468-0017.00205.
———. 2004. “The Limits of Self-Awareness.” Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3): 37–89. doi: 10.1023/B:PHIL.0000033751.66949.97.
Matthen, Mohan, and André Ariew. 2002. “Two Ways of Thinking About Fitness and Natural Selection.” Journal of Philosophy 99 (2): 55–83. doi: 10.2307/3655552.
McDowell, John. 1979. “Virtue and Reason.” Monist 62 (3): 331–50. doi: 10.5840/monist197962319.
———. 1995. “Knowledge and the Internal.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (4): 877–93. doi: 10.2307/2108338.
———. 1998. “Having the World in View: Sellars, Kant, and Intentionality: Lecture I: Sellars on Perceptual Experience.” Journal of Philosophy 95 (9): 431–50. doi: 10.2307/2564576.
McGee, Vann. 1985. “A Counterexample To Modus Ponens.” Journal of Philosophy 82 (9): 462–71. doi: 10.2307/2026276.
McHugh, Conor, and Jonathan Way. 2016. “Fittingness First.” Ethics 126 (3): 575–606. doi: 10.1086/684712.
McMahan, Jeff. 2004. “The Ethics of Killing in War.” Ethics 114 (4): 693–733. doi: 10.1086/422400.
McMullin, Ernan. 1985. “Galilean Idealization.” Studies In History And Philosophy of Science 16 (3): 247–73. doi: 10.1016/0039-3681(85)90003-2.
Millikan, Ruth Garrett. 1986. “Thoughts Without Laws, Cognitive Science With Content.” Philosophical Review 95 (1): 47–80. doi: 10.2307/2185132.
———. 1989a. “Biosemantics.” Journal of Philosophy 86 (6): 281–97. doi: 10.2307/2027123.
———. 1989b. “In Defense of Proper Functions.” Philosophy of Science 56 (2): 288–302. doi: 10.1086/289488.
Morris, Herbert. 1968. “Persons and Punishment.” Monist 52 (4): 475–501. doi: 10.5840/monist196852436.
Mulligan, Kevin, Peter Simons, and Barry Smith. 1984. “Truth-Makers.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44 (3): 287–321. doi: 10.2307/2107686.
Nagel, Thomas. 1974. “What Is It Like To Be a Bat.” Philosophical Review 83 (4): 435–50. doi: 10.2307/2183914.
———. 1987. “Moral Conflict and Political Legitimacy.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 16 (3): 215–40.
Nahmias, Eddy, Stephen Morris, Thomas Nadelhoffer, and Jason Turner. 2005. “Surveying Freedom: Folk Intuitions About Free Will and Moral Responsibility.” Philosophical Psychology 18 (5): 561–84. doi: 10.1080/09515080500264180.
Neander, Karen. 1991. “Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst’s Defense.” Philosophy of Science 58 (2): 168–84. doi: 10.1086/289610.
———. 1995. “Misrepresenting and Malfunctioning.” Philosophical Studies 79 (2): 109–41. doi: 10.1007/BF00989706.
Nguyen, C. Thi. 2020. “Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles.” Episteme 17 (2): 141–61. doi: 10.1017/epi.2018.32.
Nichols, Shaun, and Joshua Knobe. 2007. “Moral Responsibility and Determinism: The Cognitive Science of Folk Intuitions.” Noûs 41 (4): 663–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00666.x.
Oliver, Alex. 1996. “The Metaphysics of Properties.” Mind 105 (417): 1–80. doi: 10.1093/mind/105.417.1.
Parfit, Derek. 1997. “Equality and Priority.” Ratio 10 (3): 202–21. doi: 10.1111/1467-9329.00041.
Parsons, Charles. 1974. “The Liar Paradox.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 3 (4): 381–412.
Parsons, Terence. 1974. “A Prolegomenon to Meinongian Semantics.” Journal of Philosophy 71 (16): 561–80.
Partee, Barbara Hall. 1973. “Some Structural Analogies Between Tenses and Pronouns in English.” Journal of Philosophy 70 (18): 601–9.
Peacocke, Christopher. 2001. “Does Perception Have a Nonconceptual Content?” Journal of Philosophy 98 (5): 239–64. doi: 10.2307/2678383.
Perry, John. 1972. “Can the Self Divide?” Journal of Philosophy 69 (16): 463–88.
———. 1977. “Frege on Demonstratives.” Philosophical Review 86 (4): 474–97. doi: 10.2307/2184564.
———. 1979. “The Problem of the Essential Indexical.” Noûs 13 (1): 3–21. doi: 10.2307/2214792.
Piccinini, Gualtiero, and Carl Craver. 2011. “Integrating Psychology and Neuroscience: Functional Analyses as Mechanism Sketches.” Synthese 183 (3): 283–311. doi: 10.1007/s11229-011-9898-4.
Pitt, David. 2004. “The Phenomenology of Cognition, Or, What Is It Like To Think That P?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (1): 1–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2004.tb00382.x.
Plantinga, Alvin. 1983. “On Existentialism.” Philosophical Studies 44 (1): 1–20. doi: 10.1007/BF00353411.
Plunkett, David. 2015. “Which Concepts Should We Use?: Metalinguistic Negotiations and the Methodology of Philosophy.” Inquiry 58 (7-8): 828–74. doi: 10.1080/0020174X.2015.1080184.
Plunkett, David, and Tim Sundell. 2013. “Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms.” Philosophers’ Imprint 13 (23): 1–37.
Pohlhaus, Gaile, Jr. 2012. “Relational Knowing and Epistemic Injustice: Toward a Theory of Willful Hermeneutical Ignorance.” Hypatia 27 (4): 715–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01222.x.
Popper, Karl R. 1959. “The Propensity Interpretation of Probability.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37): 25–42.
Priest, Graham. 1979. “The Logic of Paradox.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (2): 219–41.
Prinzing, Michael. 2018. “The Revisionist’s Rubric: Conceptual Engineering and the Discontinuity Objection.” Inquiry 61 (8): 854–80. doi: 10.1080/0020174X.2017.1385522.
Prior, A. N. 1959. “Thank Goodness That’s Over.” Philosophy 34 (128): 12–17. doi: 10.1017/S0031819100029685.
Prior, Elizabeth W., Robert Pargetter, and Frank Jackson. 1982. “Three Theses About Dispositions.” American Philosophical Quarterly 19 (3): 251–57.
Pritchard, Duncan. 2012. “Anti-Luck Virtue Epistemology.” Journal of Philosophy 109 (3): 247–79. doi: 10.5840/jphil201210939.
Pryor, James. 2000. “The Skeptic and the Dogmatist.” Noûs 34 (4): 517–49. doi: 10.1111/0029-4624.00277.
Putnam, Hilary. 1962. “It Ain’t Necessarily So.” Journal of Philosophy 59 (22): 658–71. doi: 10.2307/2023596.
———. 1967. “Time and Physical Geometry.” Journal of Philosophy 64 (8): 240–47. doi: 10.2307/2024493.
———. 1973. “Meaning and Reference.” Journal of Philosophy 70 (19): 699–711.
———. 1980. “Models and Reality.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 45 (3): 464–82. doi: 10.2307/2273415.
Quine, Willard van Orman. 1956. “Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes.” Journal of Philosophy 53 (5): 177–87. doi: 10.2307/2022451.
———. 1968. “Ontological Relativity.” Journal of Philosophy 65 (7): 185–212. doi: 10.2307/2024305.
———. 1970. “On the Reasons for Indeterminacy of Translation.” Journal of Philosophy 67 (6): 178–83. doi: 10.2307/2023887.
Quinn, Warren S. 1989. “Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Double Effect.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 18 (4): 334–51.
Quong, Jonathan. 2009. “Killing in Self-Defense.” Ethics 119 (3): 507–37. doi: 10.1086/597595.
Rabinowicz, Wlodek, and Toni Rønnow‐Rasmussen. 2004. “The Strike of the Demon: On Fitting Pro-Attitudes and Value.” Ethics 114 (3): 391–423. doi: 10.1086/381694.
Railton, Peter. 1984. “Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 13 (2): 134–71.
———. 1986. “Moral Realism.” Philosophical Review 95 (2): 163–207. doi: 10.2307/2185589.
Raven, Michael J. 2015. “Ground.” Philosophy Compass 10 (5): 322–33. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12220.
Rawls, John. 1958. “Justice as Fairness.” Philosophical Review 67 (2): 164–94. doi: 10.2307/2182612.
———. 1980. “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.” Journal of Philosophy 77 (9): 515–35. doi: 10.2307/2025790.
———. 1985. “Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 14 (3): 223–51.
———. 1988. “The Priority of Right and Ideas of the Good.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 17 (4): 251–76.
Rice, Collin. 2015. “Moving Beyond Causes: Optimality Models and Scientific Explanation.” Noûs 49 (3): 589–615. doi: 10.1111/nous.12042.
Rinard, Susanna. 2017. “No Exception for Belief.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (1): 121–43. doi: 10.1111/phpr.12229.
Ripley, David. 2013. “Paradoxes and Failures of Cut.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (1): 139–64. doi: 10.1080/00048402.2011.630010.
Rorty, Richard. 1965. “Mind-Body Identity, Privacy, and Categories.” Review of Metaphysics 19 (1): 24–54.
———. 1970. “Incorrigibility as Mark of Mental.” Journal of Philosophy 67 (12): 399–424. doi: 10.2307/2024002.
———. 1972. “The World Well Lost.” Journal of Philosophy 69 (19): 649–65.
Rosen, Gideon. 1990. “Modal Fictionalism.” Mind 99 (395): 327–54.
Rosenthal, David M. 1986. “Two Concepts of Consciousness.” Philosophical Studies 49 (3): 329–59. doi: 10.1007/BF00355521.
Ross, Jacob, and Mark Schroeder. 2014. “Belief, Credence, and Pragmatic Encroachment.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2): 259–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00552.x.
Rupert, Robert D. 2004. “Challenges To the Hypothesis of Extended Cognition.” Journal of Philosophy 101 (8): 389–428. doi: 10.5840/jphil2004101826.
Rysiew, Patrick. 2001. “The Context-Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions.” Noûs 35 (4): 477–514. doi: 10.1111/0029-4624.00349.
Sainsbury, R. M. 1997. “Easy Possibilities.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4): 907–19. doi: 10.2307/2953809.
Salmon, Nathan. 1998. “Nonexistence.” Noûs 32 (3): 277–319. doi: 10.1111/0029-4624.00101.
Schaffer, Jonathan. 2003. “Is There a Fundamental Level?” Noûs 37 (3): 498–517. doi: 10.1111/1468-0068.00448.
———. 2009. “Spacetime the One Substance.” Philosophical Studies 145 (1): 131–48. doi: 10.1007/s11098-009-9386-6.
———. 2010a. “Monism: The Priority of the Whole.” Philosophical Review 119 (1): 31–76. doi: 10.1215/00318108-2009-025.
———. 2010b. “The Least Discerning and Most Promiscuous Truthmaker.” Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239): 307–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.612.x.
———. 2015. “What Not To Multiply Without Necessity.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (4): 644–64. doi: 10.1080/00048402.2014.992447.
———. 2016. “Grounding in the Image of Causation.” Philosophical Studies 173 (1): 49–100. doi: 10.1007/s11098-014-0438-1.
———. 2017. “The Ground Between the Gaps.” Philosophers’ Imprint 17 (11): 1–26.
Schaffner, Kenneth F. 1967. “Approaches To Reduction.” Philosophy of Science 34 (2): 137–47. doi: 10.1086/288137.
Schiffer, Stephen. 1991. “Ceteris Paribus Laws.” Mind 100 (397): 1–17.
———. 1992. “Belief Ascription.” Journal of Philosophy 89 (10): 499–521. doi: 10.2307/2941005.
Schoenfield, Miriam. 2014. “Permission To Believe: Why Permissivism Is True and What It Tells Us About Irrelevant Influences on Belief.” Noûs 48 (2): 193–218. doi: 10.1111/nous.12006.
Schroeder, Mark. 2009. “Means-End Coherence, Stringency, and Subjective Reasons.” Philosophical Studies 143 (2): 223–48. doi: 10.1007/s11098-008-9200-x.
Schwitzgebel, Eric. 2008. “The Unreliability of Naive Introspection.” Philosophical Review 117 (2): 245–73. doi: 10.1215/00318108-2007-037.
———. 2010. “Acting Contrary To Our Professed Beliefs or the Gulf Between Occurrent Judgment and Dispositional Belief.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (4): 531–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2010.01381.x.
Schwitzgebel, Eric, and Fiery Cushman. 2012. “Expertise in Moral Reasoning? Order Effects on Moral Judgment in Professional Philosophers and Non-Philosophers.” Mind and Language 27 (2): 135–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2012.01438.x.
Searle, John R. 1958. “Proper Names.” Mind 67 (266): 166–73.
———. 1962. “Meaning and Speech Acts.” Philosophical Review 71 (4): 423–32. doi: 10.2307/2183455.
———. 1964. “How To Derive Ought From Is.” Philosophical Review 73 (1): 43–58. doi: 10.2307/2183201.
Shah, Nishi. 2003. “How Truth Governs Belief.” Philosophical Review 112 (4): 447–82. doi: 10.1215/00318108-112-4-447.
———. 2006. “A New Argument for Evidentialism.” Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225): 481–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2006.454.x.
Shah, Nishi, and J. David Velleman. 2005. “Doxastic Deliberation.” Philosophical Review 114 (4): 497–534. doi: 10.1215/00318108-114-4-497.
Shapere, Dudley. 1982. “The Concept of Observation in Science and Philosophy.” Philosophy of Science 49 (4): 485–525. doi: 10.1086/289075.
Shoemaker, Sydney. 1968. “Self-Reference and Self-Awareness.” Journal of Philosophy 65 (19): 555–67. doi: 10.2307/2024121.
———. 1970. “Persons and Their Pasts.” American Philosophical Quarterly 7 (4): 269–85.
Shogenji, Tomoji. 1999. “Is Coherence Truth Conducive?” Analysis 59 (4): 338–45. doi: 10.1111/1467-8284.00191.
Sibley, Frank. 1959. “Aesthetic Concepts.” Philosophical Review 68 (4): 421–50. doi: 10.2307/2182490.
———. 1965. “Aesthetic and Non-Aesthetic.” Philosophical Review 74 (2): 135–59. doi: 10.2307/2183262.
Sider, Theodore. 1996. “All the World’s a Stage.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (3): 433–53. doi: 10.1080/00048409612347421.
Siegel, Susanna. 2012. “Cognitive Penetrability and Perceptual Justification.” Noûs 46 (2): 201–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00786.x.
Singer, Peter. 1972. “Famine, Affluence, and Morality.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 1 (3): 229–43.
Skiles, Alexander. 2015. “Against Grounding Necessitarianism.” Erkenntnis 80 (4): 717–51. doi: 10.1007/s10670-014-9669-y.
Smart, J. J. C. 1959. “Sensations and Brain Processes.” Philosophical Review 68 (2): 141–56. doi: 10.2307/2182164.
———. 1961. “Free-Will, Praise and Blame.” Mind 70 (279): 291–306.
Smith, Angela M. 2005. “Responsibility for Attitudes: Activity and Passivity in Mental Life.” Ethics 115 (2): 236–71. doi: 10.1086/426957.
Smith, Michael. 1987. “The Humean Theory of Motivation.” Mind 96 (381): 36–61.
Sober, Elliot. 1980. “Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism.” Philosophy of Science 47 (3): 350–83. doi: 10.1086/288942.
Srinivasan, Amia. 2018. “The Aptness of Anger.” Journal of Political Philosophy 26 (2): 123–44. doi: 10.1111/jopp.12130.
Stalnaker, Robert C. 1970. “Probability and Conditionals.” Philosophy of Science 37 (1): 64–80. doi: 10.1086/288280.
———. 1975. “Indicative Conditionals.” Philosophia 5 (3): 269–86. doi: 10.1007/BF02379021.
———. 1976. “Possible Worlds.” Noûs 10 (1): 65–75. doi: 10.2307/2214477.
———. 2002. “Common Ground.” Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (5-6): 701–21. doi: 10.1023/A:1020867916902.
Stampe, Dennis W. 1987. “The Authority of Desire.” Philosophical Review 96 (3): 335–81. doi: 10.2307/2185225.
Stanley, Jason. 2000. “Context and Logical Form.” Linguistics and Philosophy 23 (4): 391–434. doi: 10.1023/A:1005599312747.
Stanley, Jason, and Zoltán Gendler Szabó. 2000. “On Quantifier Domain Restriction.” Mind and Language 15 (2-3): 219–61. doi: 10.1111/1468-0017.00130.
Stanley, Jason, and Timothy Williamson. 2001. “Knowing How.” Journal of Philosophy 98 (8): 411–44. doi: 10.2307/2678403.
———. 2017. “Skill.” Noûs 51 (4): 713–26. doi: 10.1111/nous.12144.
Sterelny, Kim, and Philip Kitcher. 1988. “The Return of the Gene.” Journal of Philosophy 85 (7): 339–61. doi: 10.2307/2026953.
Stich, Stephen P. 1978. “Beliefs and Subdoxastic States.” Philosophy of Science 45 (4): 499–518. doi: 10.1086/288832.
Stocker, Michael. 1976. “The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories.” Journal of Philosophy 73 (14): 453–66. doi: 10.2307/2025782.
Strawson, Galen. 1994. “The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility.” Philosophical Studies 75 (1-2): 5–24. doi: 10.1007/BF00989879.
Strawson, P. F. 1964. “Intention and Convention in Speech Acts.” Philosophical Review 73 (4): 439–60. doi: 10.2307/2183301.
Street, Sharon. 2006. “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value.” Philosophical Studies 127 (1): 109–66. doi: 10.1007/s11098-005-1726-6.
Stroud, Barry. 1968. “Transcendental Arguments.” Journal of Philosophy 65 (9): 241–56. doi: 10.2307/2024395.
Sturgeon, Scott. 2008. “Reason and the Grain of Belief.” Noûs 42 (1): 139–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00676.x.
Sundell, Timothy. 2011. “Disagreements About Taste.” Philosophical Studies 155 (2): 267–88. doi: 10.1007/s11098-010-9572-6.
Swain, Marshall. 1972. “Knowledge, Causality, and Justification.” Journal of Philosophy 69 (11): 291–300.
Swain, Stacey, Joshua Alexander, and Jonathan M. Weinberg. 2008. “The Instability of Philosophical Intuitions: Running Hot and Cold on Truetemp.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (1): 138–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00118.x.
Swoyer, Chris. 1982. “The Nature of Natural Laws.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60 (3): 203–23. doi: 10.1080/00048408212340641.
Taurek, John M. 1977. “Should the Numbers Count?” Philosophy & Public Affairs 6 (4): 293–316.
Temkin, Larry S. 1987. “Intransitivity and the Mere Addition Paradox.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 16 (2): 138–87.
Thagard, Paul R. 1978. “The Best Explanation: Criteria for Theory Choice.” Journal of Philosophy 75 (2): 76–92. doi: 10.2307/2025686.
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1971a. “A Defense of Abortion.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 1 (1): 47–66.
———. 1971b. “The Time of a Killing.” Journal of Philosophy 68 (5): 115–32.
———. 1983. “Parthood and Identity Across Time.” Journal of Philosophy 80 (4): 201–20. doi: 10.2307/2026004.
———. 1991. “Self-Defense.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 20 (4): 283–310.
———. 1998. “The Statue and the Clay.” Noûs 32 (2): 149–73. doi: 10.1111/0029-4624.00094.
Tooley, Michael. 1977. “Nature of Laws.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7 (4): 667–98.
Travis, Charles. 2004. “The Silence of the Senses.” Mind 113 (449): 57–94. doi: 10.1093/mind/113.449.57.
Trogdon, Kelly. 2013. “Grounding: Necessary or Contingent?” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (4): 465–85. doi: 10.1111/papq.12009.
Unger, Peter. 1968. “An Analysis of Factual Knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 65 (6): 157–70. doi: 10.2307/2024203.
Velleman, J. David. 1999. “Love as a Moral Emotion.” Ethics 109 (2): 338–74. doi: 10.1086/233898.
Veltman, Frank. 1996. “Defaults in Update Semantics.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (3): 221–61.
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. “Verbs and Times.” Philosophical Review 66 (2): 143–60. doi: 10.2307/2182371.
Vogel, Jonathan. 1990. “Cartesian Skepticism and Inference To the Best Explanation.” Journal of Philosophy 87 (11): 658–66. doi: 10.5840/jphil1990871123.
Walton, Kendall L. 1970. “Categories of Art.” Philosophical Review 79 (3): 334–67. doi: 10.2307/2183933.
———. 1978. “Fearing Fictions.” Journal of Philosophy 75 (1): 5–27. doi: 10.2307/2025831.
Watson, Gary. 1975. “Free Agency.” Journal of Philosophy 72 (8): 205–20. doi: 10.2307/2024703.
Weinberg, Jonathan M., Chad Gonnerman, Cameron Buckner, and Joshua Alexander. 2010. “Are Philosophers Expert Intuiters?” Philosophical Psychology 23 (3): 331–55. doi: 10.1080/09515089.2010.490944.
Weiner, Matthew. 2005. “Must We Know What We Say?” Philosophical Review 114 (2): 227–51. doi: 10.1215/00318108-114-2-227.
Weisberg, Michael. 2007. “Three Kinds of Idealization.” Journal of Philosophy 104 (12): 639–59. doi: 10.5840/jphil20071041240.
Whitcomb, Dennis, Heather Battaly, Jason Baehr, and Daniel Howard-Snyder. 2017. “Intellectual Humility: Owning Our Limitations.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (3): 509–39. doi: 10.1111/phpr.12228.
White, Roger. 2006. “Problems for Dogmatism.” Philosophical Studies 131 (3): 525–57. doi: 10.1007/s11098-004-7487-9.
Widerker, David. 1995. “Libertarianism and Frankfurt’s Attack on the Principle of Alternative Possibilities.” Philosophical Review 104 (2): 247–61. doi: 10.2307/2185979.
Williamson, Timothy. 1996. “Knowing and Asserting.” Philosophical Review 105 (4): 489–523. doi: 10.2307/2998423.
———. 2005. “Contextualism, Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and Knowledge of Knowledge.” Philosophical Quarterly 55 (219): 213–35. doi: 10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00396.x.
———. 2011. “Philosophical Expertise and the Burden of Proof.” Metaphilosophy 42 (3): 215–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01685.x.
Wilson, Alastair. 2018. “Metaphysical Causation.” Noûs 52 (4): 723–51. doi: 10.1111/nous.12190.
Wilson, Jessica M. 2014. “No Work for a Theory of Grounding.” Inquiry 57 (5-6): 535–79. doi: 10.1080/0020174X.2014.907542.
Wolf, Susan. 1982. “Moral Saints.” Journal of Philosophy 79 (8): 419–39. doi: 10.2307/2026228.
———. 1997. “Happiness and Meaning: Two Aspects of the Good Life.” Social Philosophy & Policy 14 (1): 207–25. doi: 10.1017/S0265052500001734.
Woodward, James. 2010. “Causation in Biology: Stability, Specificity, and the Choice of Levels of Explanation.” Biology and Philosophy 25 (3): 287–318. doi: 10.1007/s10539-010-9200-z.
———. 2015. “Interventionism and Causal Exclusion.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (2): 303–47. doi: 10.1111/phpr.12095.
Worsnip, Alex. 2018. “The Conflict of Evidence and Coherence.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96 (1): 3–44. doi: 10.1111/phpr.12246.
Wright, Crispin. 2002. “(Anti-)Sceptics Simple and Subtle: G.E. Moore and John McDowell.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2): 330–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00205.x.
Yablo, Stephen. 1992. “Mental Causation.” Philosophical Review 101 (2): 245–80. doi: 10.2307/2185535.
———. 1993a. “Is Conceivability a Guide To Possibility.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (1): 1–42. doi: 10.2307/2108052.
———. 1993b. “Paradox Without Self-Reference.” Analysis 53 (4): 251–52. doi: 10.2307/3328245.
Yalcin, Seth. 2007. “Epistemic Modals.” Mind 116 (464): 983–1026. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzm983.
Zimmerman, Dean W. 1995. “Theories of Masses and Problems of Constitution.” Philosophical Review 104 (1): 53–110. doi: 10.2307/2186012.
Zimmerman, Michael J. 1997. “Moral Responsibility and Ignorance.” Ethics 107 (3): 410–26. doi: 10.1086/233742.
Zollman, Kevin J. S. 2010. “The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity.” Erkenntnis 72 (1): 17–35. doi: 10.1007/s10670-009-9194-6.